This year with my yoga business (Cambridge Yoga Project) we have a dedicated charity of the year for the first time! It had to be @MQmentalhealth - research is the future of #mentalhealth.
Read more about why I’m so pleased to support MQ including as an ambassador below 👇🏽
Our first event is on Tuesday 7th Feb 6-7.15pm and is called MOVE for MQ, a super fun movement/dance class fusing music, movement, yogic philosophy, embodiment theory and more- to create something good together!
If you happen to be in Cambridge do join in: yogaproject.co.uk/event-details/… or get a donation ticket if you fancy to cover costs/let someone attend for free who can’t afford it but would benefit.
I can’t wait to do more throughout the year (including online!) @MQmentalhealth
It's a clinical need to be held in safety or saved from danger. It's not a need-to-feed some kind of a pathology/ a shameful part of yourself / a need you should have met elsewhere. But it can seem like services have given up on the ideas of holding in safety or saving from harm
Yet other services which support health see it very differently and use different language without the same shame. Lifesaving in emergency services, special care dentistry, high-dependency units - because they are needed not simply desired.
One of the greatest problems in #mentalhealth care is how intensity of care is overlooked. You may have needed far more than an hour of therapy a week, but you're described as having had treatment. As though it was somehow automatically enough and appropriate for your needs
1/
But the evidence isn't there that 1hr of therapy/wk is the right intensity for all outpatients. It's arbitrary - reflecting service design & capacity more than patient need. It feels cruel when people will misunderstand you as being adequately supported because "in treatment"
2/
The gulf between inpatient care and outpatient at least in terms of contact hrs if not therapeutic activity is too vast. The push-to-community has raced to the bottom - the minimum of what can be provided to still constitute contact/treatment
3/
My experiences of #mentalhealth emergencies have been many and varied, but they have ALL been made worse by a huge fear of being misunderstood or not heard. The absolute terror of being dismissed or ignored when in a crisis has been worse than the crisis itself.
The fear is not irrational. For me it became embodied through experience - experience of being denied care, being completely misunderstood, being hung up on by 111 & 999 because unable to stop crying enough to say your date of birth. Of being left without a support net at all.
I can barely explain the terror of your compellingly urgent and totally life-threatening experience being unknowable, uninteresting, unimportant or un-hearable to others. It's traumatic and makes help-seeking terrifying for fear of it happening again
I never counted calories until I was told that people with anorexia are fixated on calories
When I was last in #eatingdisorders treatment it was suggested to me to count calories even though I'd been a healthy weight & not calorie-counted for over 5 years
This is a problem 🧵->
At what stage to we stop and think about how treatment might actually introduce people to harmful behaviour/thoughts/beliefs by imposing pretty fixed understandings of what it is to have a particular condition? I think this happens in #eatingdisorders
When those in authority, with the power to define constructs, say "#anorexia is this" (for example) - to what extent do *some* patients then feel that this construct is something they have to fulfil, embody, talk the language of?
To what extent do patients get *given* identities?