Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Just Human Profile picture
@realjusthuman
Feb 3, 2023 • 15 tweets • 7 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
🧵

New batch of FOIAs have dropped thanks to @15poundstogo and @JudicialWatch

Full batch is here: drive.google.com/file/d/1xZ6D3P…
One document that immediately drew attention was this FBI 302.

Not because it is new, but because it has been RECLASSIFIED and redacted as of last Spring.
Here is the version that @jsolomonReports obtained and published on January 20th, 2021.

Link: justthenews.com/sites/default/…
To reclassify a document is no simple matter.

Source: justice.gov/oip/page/file/…

h/t: @mgEyesOpen
One explanation for this reclassification that I have seen offered in a few places is that DOJ set Trump up by reclassifying it, knowing that he had a copy.

This is at least partially based on the timing of Trump's back and forth with NARA and DOJ over docs stored at MAL.
I get why pple would jump to that take, but I don't think it holds up.

Here is the timeline of the Trump-NARA-DOJ.

DOJ was already involved before this doc got reclassified.

Source: cnn.com/2022/08/09/pol…
And nowhere, that I have seen, has it been argued by DOJ or NARA that Trump had docs that were reclassified. I think they would have mentioned that in the court filings somewhere by now.
Besides, the President can and DID declassify this document. It was published.

So I do not think this would be the "Gotcha, Orange Man!" trick that a few folks seem to think it would be.
So then, why has this document been reclassified?

Clues and indicators as to why are on and in the document itself.
NSICG = National Security Information
Classification Guide

archive.org/stream/FBIClas…

REASON: 1.4 (C) = intelligence activities (including covert action), intelligence sources or methods, or cryptology

federalregister.gov/documents/2010…
The redactions are for these reasons:

b6 = privacy (names)
b7 = for law enforcement purposes

justice.gov/oip/page/file/…
So, knowing and understanding all of this, lets read the redacted and unredacted versions again.
The doc is referencing Steele and Burrows of Orbis meeting with FBI and apologizing for running to the media with the Dossier.

Steele and Burrows say they did so because they were "riding two horses," one was the FBI and one was their client.
That client, was Hillary Clinton and they chose her.

So, to RECLASSIFY this document, something MUST be going on with either Steele, Burrows, Orbis, HRC, the FBI agents at this meeting, or a combo thereof.

END
rumble.com/v288bfg-doj-re…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Just Human

Just Human Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @realjusthuman

Just Human Profile picture
Dec 31, 2025
🧵Richman v. United States
(Arctic Haze search warrant material case)

ORDER: DOJ must get a search warrant for Arctic Haze/Richman materials seized from Richman in 2017, 2019, and 2020.

And that includes materials under seal in the EDVA and within DOJ "component" offices. Image
Backstory:

Just days after United States v. Comey was dismissed for Interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan being unlawfully appointed, Daniel Richman, who is Person 3 from the indictment in the Comey case, filed a civil case against the DOJ.
Richman wants the property he volunteered to DOJ in 2017 and the materials that were seized from him pursuant to the four Arctic Haze search warrants in 2019 and 2020 to be returned to him.
Read 30 tweets
Just Human Profile picture
Dec 31, 2025
🧵United States v. Cole
(J6 Pipe Bomber case)

Minute Entry:
Following today's detention hearing, Cole remains held without bond as the judge considers each side's motions.

1/5 Image
MINUTE ORDER:

A D.C. Superior Court grand jury returned a two-count indictment against Cole for the same two counts charged in the criminal complaint—18 U.S.C. 844(d) and 844(i).

This indictment has not been filed publicly but was presented to the judge yesterday.

2/5 Image
Federal prosecutors using a local grand jury in this way is a new thing in DC. It came about thanks to the Trump Admin's push to neutralize criminal activity in the capital.

But the issue is currently before the Court of Appeals.

3/5
archive.is/14vO2Image
Read 5 tweets
Just Human Profile picture
Dec 30, 2025
🧵United States v. Cole
(J6 Pipe Bomber case)

New filing from Defense opposing Cole being held in jail pending trial.

"Mr. Cole should be released pending trial because the governing, multi-factor analysis demonstrates that bail is required..."

Hearing today at 1pm. Image
"The defense’s position is that the government cannot continue to keep Mr. Cole in custody absent a valid finding of probable cause." Image
"Probable cause or not, Mr. Cole should be released pending trial."

"two essential principles of law that govern bail hearings"

1) The default position is release unless there is "a concrete, prospective threat to public safety that cannot be mitigated"

2) Guilt is irrelevant; only the evidence that the defendant is dangerous matters as regards a bail hearing.Image
Read 21 tweets
Just Human Profile picture
Dec 29, 2025
🧵United States v. Cole
(J6 Pipe Bomber case)

NEW FILING: Cole CONFESSED to making and planting the pipe bombs on J5

and

The J5 pipe bombs had nothing to do with the events of J6.
There's some new info in this filing:

- The post-arrest interview was hours long and video recorded.

- "Over the next approximately one and one-half hours, the defendant walked the interviewing agents in detail through his construction, transportation, and planting of the pipe bombs."

- Brian Cole Jr "reset" or "wiped" his Samsung smartphone 943 times between December 2020 and December 2025.

- The pipe bombs "were viable explosive devices."

- FBI found pipe bomb components in Cole Jr's home and in his vehicle.

-"According to the defendant, 'no one knows' his political views, including his family."

- "He made the black powder in the devices using charcoal, Lilly Miller sulfur dust, and potassium nitrate that he purchased from Lowes."

- He "denied that his actions were directed toward Congress or related to the proceedings scheduled to take place on January 6."

- Motive: "he explained that 'something just snapped' after 'watching everything, just everything getting worse.' The defendant wanted to do something 'to the parties' because 'they were in charge.' 'I really don’t like either party at this point.'"
The most important takeaway from the filing:

The J5 pipe bombs had nothing to do with the events of J6.

None of the popular narratives about the pipe bombs and how they fit into either side's J6 story are correct.
Read 8 tweets
Just Human Profile picture
Dec 29, 2025
United States v. Cole
(J6 Pipe Bomber case)

A new filing by prosecutors states,

"Following his December 4, 2025 arrest, the defendant waived his Miranda rights and gave a detailed confession to the charged offenses."Image
Prosecutors filed this memo in support of their oral motion for Brian J. Cole, Jr., to be detained pending trial.

Cole has a detention hearing coming up on December 30, 2025, at 1:00 p.m. Image
Much of the news memo is simply restating the same information that is in the affidavit when Cole was arrested.

Thread on that here
x.com/realjusthuman/…

Video here
youtu.be/rq9NXe6yyOw?si…
Read 34 tweets
Just Human Profile picture
Dec 21, 2025
🧵The same phenomenon of perception exists in politics and so much else.
We rarely perceive a person, idea, or event exactly as it is/they are—we instead make a near-automatic inference based on context, emotions, the social status we attach to it/them, and the narratives that surround it (or don't).
We make these calculations instantaneously, without prompting.

Just like we all did when we first glanced at the example above and perceived the batteries to be of differing sizes, we do the same thing to people, ideas, and events. Right? : )
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(