In the early part of 19th century, the freedom fighters across India came together & decided to go all out against British.
Abhinav Bharath, Anushilan Samithi & Gadar party were formed to liberate Bharath.
By #Violence, they built
pressure & with Pen, they caught the attention world over.
At this crucial juncture, when Independence was inevitable, the British planned to bring Gandhi to India in early 1915.
How they did? Read on…
The British themselves enhanced his stature among the general public,
which in due course, contributed to his emergence as the Mahatma. On the eve of his return to India in Jan 1915, Gen Smuts, the South African min, told the press: "I am convinced that Gandhi is sincerely anxious to come to a fair settlement, and his power while it lasts, is an
enormous asset to Britain in its efforts to arrive at a settlement.''
British ensured a hero's welcome for Gandhi. They arranged for him to land at the Apollo Bunder in Bombay - an honor accorded to Royalty.
Viceroy Lord Hardinge conferred on him the Kaiser-i-Hind gold medal
for his services in Africa . On his arrival, he was welcomed by those who among the knighted industrialists - Sir Dorab Tata, Sir J. B. Petit, Sir Vithaldas Thackersay, Sir Purshotamdas Thakurdas, Sir Ibrahim Rahimtoola, Sir Jamshetji Jeejibhoy and otherS
18-year-old young revolutionary, Gopinath Saha, was hanged in March 1924 after seeking to kill a notorious Police Commissioner, Charles Tegart & killing a civilian Ernest Day by mistake.
He had stirred Bengal by valiantly declaring at the court that
he really had intended to murder Tegart and expressed his sincere sorrow for having killed the wrong person. He was glad to pay with his life and hoped that "May every drop of my blood sow the seeds of freedom in every home of India''
At Sirajgunj in Pabna, the Bengal Provincial
Conference held in May 1924, passed a resolution which while disassociating itself from violence, paid a tribute to Saha's ideal of self sacrifice.
On June 11, 1924, GD Birla complained to Gandhi: "At the Sirajgunj Conference, the Swarajists have openly declared themselves in
favour of violence & have thereby torn the mask of non-violence off their faces. Thus, ended the drama of non-violence." @authorAneesh
Subsequently, Gandhi strongly disapproved of the resolution & was in fact infuriated when C R Das praised the courage, sacrificing spirit of
Gopinath Saha. A resolution was moved at the AICC at Gandhi's instance in June 1924, which characterised Saha's action as misguided love of the country & disapproved emphatically of all political murders as inconsistent with the Congress creed.
The same AICC resolution also
went out of the way to commiserate with Ernest Day's family, but did not have a single word to say about the fate of the teenaged Gopinath Saha. Gandhi declared himself as 'Defeated and Humbled" that the resolution was passed at a narrow margin of 78 in favor and 70 against.
Gandhi also forced the Calcutta Corporation to annul a similar resolution that it had passed.
As an aside, the Karachi Congress in 1931 passed a similar resolution on Bhagat Singh in Gandhi's presence and under the presidency of his staunch loyalist, Vallabhbhai Patel.
S Bose quipped: "The circumstances at Karachi were such that this resolution had to be swallowed by people, who under ordinary circumstances, would not come within miles of it. So far as the Mahatma was concerned, he had to make his conscience somewhat elastic.''
In another
instance, Revolutionaries attempted to blow up the Viceregal Special on December 23, 1929 at Delhi. Gandhi himself moved a resolution in Dec 1929, Lahore session of the Congress, congratulating the Viceroy on his escape & condemning the revolutionaries.
(netajisubhasbose.org/post/what-was-…)
It said: "This Congress deplores the bomb outrage perpetrated on the Viceroy's train & reiterates its conviction that such action is not only contrary to the creed of the Congress but results in harm being done to the national cause. It congratulates the Viceroy and Lady Irwin
Before finishing, bit of history to leave you thinking....
In 1909, Gandhi believed that "it is a cowardly
thought, that of killing others.'' Within a decade, while enlisting for defending the Bristish, he said that Indians can immortalize themselves by sacrificing their lives as British soldiers in the WW- 1.
If they [Indians fighting for the British in the first world war]
fall on the battle-field, they will immortalize themselves, their village and their country.
(Ref mkgandhi.org/hindswaraj/cha…)
Gandhi moved resolution congratulating Viceroy Irwin & his wife for escaping from bomb attack, by saying he see himself as a trustee of the safety of British lives.
But what about the lives of the Congressmen, or other freedom fighters,
who were required to sacrifice without demur. Many Congressmen opposed the resolution, eg, HD Rajah from Tamil Nadu wondered "What did it matter to them whether the bomb hit the Viceroy or a donkey?'' The resolution won by a narrow margin, 904 in favor and 823 against ''
(later the word "donkey'' was replaced by "any other'')
H D Rajah, a great SC leader from TN and proud Hindu was later sidelined by Congress & Ambedkar, got politically marginalised, this blunder of Congress gave way to EVR, DK.
On the Janma Divas of Brave #SuhasiniGanguly, I write a brief tribute for the woman who was a rare figure in male dominated bastion of revolutionaries.
Born on this day Feb 03 1909 at Bengal, she passed matriculation and joined as a teacher at
Kolkata where she got acquainted with #JugantarParty and by 1929, British came to know about her activities.
She shifted her base to Chandannagar as it was French ruled, the Chittagong Armory Raid was one of the biggest attacks on British & Suhasini with Shashidhar Acharya
disguised themselves as Married Couple & gave shelters for those freedom fighters at her place. On September 01, 1930 British raided her house & in the melee Jiban Ghoshal got killed, Suhasini for the first time got arrested.
“Even should the British leave in consequence of such murderous acts, who will rule in their place? The only answer is: the murderers”.
According to Gandhi, British were fit to rule India and those who took up armed resistance against
British were Murderers.
Remember that this statement was done in 1909, where there was no connection between Gandhi & Freedom Struggle.
"India can gain nothing from the rule of murderers-no matter whether they are black or white. Under such a rule, India will be utterly ruined
& laid waste. This train of thought leads to a host of reflections, but I have no time to set them down here. I'm afraid some Indians will commend this murder. I believe they will be guilty of a heinous sin. We ought to abandon such fanciful ideas.'' (Ref: Gandhi - Hind Swaraj)