#OpenAccess paper in the Journal of Archaeological Science applying digital and statistical methods to analyse polygonal masonry in South Central #Italy 1/5
Dry-set masonry of "polygonal" blocks (here, Alatri in Lazio) is v. common in pre-Roman Italy and across Iron Age Mediterranean.
But perceived as irregular and hard to quantify, this technique is overlooked in current debates about societal and economic impacts of building 2/5
Our paper uses digital recording tools employed by @Giacomo_Arch's Ancient Hillforts Survey (see paper linked here) to create formal mode of assessing worked surface and volume of blocks, facilitating quantitative modeling of labor costs. 3/5 doi.org/10.1080/009346…
The hope is that this can help include numerous pre-Roman and Iron Age sites into wider discussions of the historical impacts of monumental construction in early societies 4/5
Extensions of our paper's methodology to other sites are already in the works! My brilliant co-author @Giacomo_Arch wrote the paper in R and has set out everything #OpenAccess in Quarto for others to use! 5/5 zenodo.org/record/7569523
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ok, this is for @MichaelESmith. Cifani's new history of the early Roman economy is a useful repository of data. Theoretically, however, it's a bit of a mess. I was asked to write a response for a journal issue and decided to tackle the issue of underlying theory: 1/
Cifani argues that Rome was a regionally dominant and economically powerful state from a very early point, from the Final Bronze Age to Early Iron Age transition--very early 2/
His economic model is a bit tough to suss out amidst the detail. The book is decidedly not committed to New Institutional Economics. My reading is that he argues for a form Smithian growth: he sees wealth accruing from the extension of trade and related specialization 3/
I continue to find problematic the reconstruction of those defences along the established 4th c. BCE lines, and their use as a fixed point for wider argumentation:
Wider argumentation will establish the walls’ shape, and not vice versa.
Specific to Veii, the U of Rome excavations have indeed been revelatory, even if they’ve turned up enough peculiarities to make problems for straightforward extrapolation Veii—> Rome
Thread on the #walls of #Rome TP Wiseman’s brand new paper on FirstView weighs in on the old debate of the age and shape of Rome’s early fortifications: cup.org/3cOTdGe
It’s been almost 10 years since I weighed in on this topic, suggesting our extant evidence (lit, arch, otherwise) was insufficient to resolve this debate. I still think at least that much is true, despite some very firm claims otherwise. jstor.org/stable/41725315
In the intervening decade, I’ve grown increasingly charitable to the idea of Rome as an extensive Mediterranean capital by the early 6th c. I STILL, however, think that the idea that the city had a full circuit at that date is an assumption, and a speculative one at that.
Been doing a deep dive on early Italian burial practices and wanted to collect some very sketchy + preliminary thoughts on wealth and power in period...a (long) thread on Iron Age Italian #archaeology, ending with some questions... 1/17
The Early Iron Age to Orientalizing transition (ca. 750-700 BCE) witnesses one of more radical changes in Italian material culture, up there with any in premodern period. Bc much relevant archaeology is burial, this change is visible above all in funerary landscapes
The big innovation is appearance of "Princely Tombs," exotic and lavish grave goods, often complex and monumental architecture (mounds, etc.). Bernardini Tomb at Praeneste (cup below, ca. 675 BCE) is famous, but these are widespread + really rich.
Thread on why I find the whole Boris Johnson thing--what I call the "Dead Poet's Society" model of Classics--so despicable (even beyond his politics).
Some context: as I've been doing for yrs, I just finished explaining to randos at Xmas parties what "Classics" is 1/
It's tiresome, and nowadays I usually lead with Roman history and Roman archaeology. Those are things I do professionally that everyone usually gets. 2/
By contrast, Classics remain nebulous. We in the discipline "get it", but that's like 15k (a guess) professionals in N. America? We forget how small that world is.
And now this is getting play as an "exciting" thing for Classics: memorizing and reciting a bit of Homer! 3/