Pervaiz Musharraf made some choices in the beginning that contrasted sharply with the Zia era. He opened up cellular phones and TV channels. He made a point about highlighting his Turkey experience, met with politicians like Ajmal Khattak and referenced Faiz. By contrast later on Image
His early cabinet, with the exception of the KP belt, made some surprising choices from the NGO sector with appointing Zubeida Jalal and the late Omer Asghar Khan.
His other appointments from Balochistan included Dr. Malik Kasi and as Governor CJ Amir ul Mulk Mengal
In Punjab and Sindh he co-opted people like Shahid Kardar and Hamida Khuhro. Behind the scenes power was with the army monitoring teams and the agencies that were primarily targeting PMLN. In KP, which had PMLN was either the 1st or 2nd biggest party was shattered as Q was formed
PMLN would never recover as the Sharif focus remained focussed on a Punjab revival.
In Punjab the two keys to power were firstly getting rid of the Sharifs who duly obliged by going into exile and second getting the Chaudhry’s of Gujrat on board via his middle man Tariq Aziz.
In Sindh the agencies assembled a motley crew of interior Sindh politicians many of whom are now in the PPP. But the key was Musharrafs rehabilitation of the MQM. The appointment of Dr Ishratul Ibad proved that in 🇵🇰 political relevance means more than popular support.
The former means you have utility. The latter means you can’t be controlled.
All this engineering must have consumed a huge amount of resources. So by the time there was the 1st upsurge of violence at the behest of the proto TTP groups, his solution was not to change Pakistans support for ‘good Taliban groups’ but to negotiate or pretend all was well. Image
The devastation this would lead on the Pashtun belt
was unprecedented. By the time he left office the Pakistan establishment had conceded large chunks of territory to these groups. Image
His opening of the media was not without check.
People like @SSEHBAI1 faced harassment and exile under the #Musharraf era.
The tragedy of the Baloch insurgence was a deal was almost finalised
“However, in Dec 2005, when Gen Musharraf was addressing a meeting.., rockets were fired... This gave hardliners the opportunity to reverse the peace process.”
@Mushahid
herald.dawn.com/news/1153862
“He won’t know what hit him” was Musharrafs refrain for Bugti. The province was left with a legacy of large scale insurgency and a traumatised generation of young kids who saw loved ones abducted by the state without any recourse to justice.
As he became more established in power his world view reflected the Pakistan state approach of “walk and chew gum at the same time” towards centres of power.
He believed in the minus one approach to political party’s. He was not anti PMLN as long as it didn’t have Nawaz Sharif
leading it. He wasn’t anti PPP as long as the leader wasn’t Benazir. He would court Shehbaz as the acceptable leader or Amin Fahim. If they didn’t play ball pressure was applied. The graduate degree qualification was introduced to shake things up and also used as tactic against
JUI and JI leaders. Two term limits and mandatory party elections were introduced as were bans against convicted politicians thereby forcing the PPP to create a PPP parliamentarians. When that didn’t work his agencies would help create a breakaway ‘Patriots’ PPP. PML had its Q.
And Q would in turn attract assorted elements from different party’s. From Farooq Leghari to Ajmal Khattak to G.M Jatoi.
In 2002, despite all the manipulation his elections still didn’t deliver a convincing win. The Chaudhrys backed PML Balochistan Zafarullah Jamali was nominated as PM despite the Akhtar’s of Lahore thinking that was their chance.
Needing every vote possible the chances were
improved by a (intentional) divide in the opposition. Maulana Fazlur Rehman was the joint nominee of the MMA, PMLN and Imran Khan and while the PPP (P) nominated a loyal party veteran called Shah Mehmood Qureshi.
@ImranKhanPTI would allege in July 2002 the general's powerful principal secretary, Tariq Aziz, tried to convince Mr Khan to join a pro-military alliance of political parties. But their meeting ended in acrimony. "You will never win your seat now.”
theguardian.com/world/2002/sep…
The Taliban policy was equally dual.
On one hand it was well known that Pakistan
state was driven by a single minded desire to ensure it maintained dominance over Afghanistan.
Musharraf would deny the existence of the Quetta shura.
While giving strategic depth to the Taliban.
“This is the most ridiculous statement, and it is the most ridiculous thought that the Taliban headquarters can be in Quetta... and Mullah Omar has never been to Pakistan—why would he come now?“
He would tell an event hosted by Bob Rubin

cfr.org/event/conversa…
In terms of FATA and the Pashtun belt.
A look back at the assassination of Benazir Bhutto.
“..am tired of speaking..of telling our story again & again. If only suicide was not prohibited..I would have killed myself. The court has been hearing our case for years but my son is still not with me..”
-Father of a missing person @mohammedhanif
hrcp-web.org/hrcpweb/wp-con… Image
@P_Musharraf #Musharraf life was one of
avoiding the line of fire and escaping justice.
They say Judgement delayed is judgement denied.
But the final judgement on the system he served
is still pending.
Some additional reading for those interested.
“2003 ended with arrest of journalist Khawar Mehdi Rizvi & gov threats against journalist Amir Mir after he too wrote a ‘sensitive article’..Days later, 3.. persons came to his house..,poured gasoline on his car& set it on fire. ImageImage
The Islamabad District and Sessions Court in April convicted Javed Hashmi of sedition, mutiny, and forgery. A month later the regime barricaded Lahore against its own citizens & arrested thousands to prevent an opposition @CMShehbaz leader from returning.
In July, the two-year Ranger-military efforts to evict tenant farmers in Okara by violence became internationally infamous with a devastating report by Human Rights Watch (HRW) in New York” @kdastgirkhan
“What Musharraf Calls Sedition is in Fact Patriotism”
The arrest of CJ Chaudhry, the pic that went viral
and triggered the kala coat movement. Image
The movement would make household names of Aitzaz Ahsan, Ali Ahmed Kurd and Munir Malik.
reserved.

“Ali Ahmed Kurd, sets a decision of Supreme Court rejecting legal challenges to Musharraf's rule ablaze in Islamabad, September 29, 2007. REUTERS/Mian Khursheed (PAKISTAN)” Image
Without justice there is nothing but sorrow
Just think, in the history of the world
When has the law giver been imprisoned
Just for the ego of a dictator
Justice has been trampled.”
- Kal, Aaj aur Kal

pakistaniat.com/2008/02/15/ait…
Nawaz Sharif appointed General #PervaizMusharraf (who took on the unusual title of Chief Executive after the 1999 coup).
Generals Ali Kuli Khan and Khalid Nawaz were superseded in favour of a man expected to be pliant. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 𝒕𝒂𝒌𝒉𝒂𝒍𝒖𝒔 ( تخلّص )

𝒕𝒂𝒌𝒉𝒂𝒍𝒖𝒔 ( تخلّص ) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @takhalus

Apr 15, 2022
There has only been one man who successfully outflanked Pakistan’s military establishment in terms of being seen as more Nationalist . The man was ZA Bhutto.
How did he do it?
It began with a crisis, a foreign country, mysterious death & ended with a lie about a secret document.
The crisis was the 1965 Pakistan-India war.
The foreign country was Russia /Soviet Union brokering a peace agreement between 🇮🇳 & 🇵🇰
The mysterious death was India’s PM L.B Shastri.
The Tashkent declaration was essentially a return to status quo.
soviethistory.msu.edu/1968-2/third-w…
ZAB would return to Pakistan and tell people that in fact Pakistan had won the inconclusive war. The narrative would be that Dictator Ayub Khan had, despite winning the war, sold the Army and country out with the connivance of Russia and the USA

thefridaytimes.com/2016/11/04/the…
Read 8 tweets
Apr 14, 2020
A bit of Pakistan history here.
The year circa September 1965.
The place, the @UN Security Council special session
discussing a ceasefire proposal between India and Pakistan.
The speaker Pakistan Foreign Minister Z. A Bhutto rips into India on #Kashmir pledges to fight on!
It is a bombastic speech playing to the galleries. He cites Wilson to the Americans, Algeria to the French in talks about self determination. Despite his weary country having failed to achieve a decisive victory over India he pledges to fight for a thousand years..
What follows is a brilliant display of theatrics as Bhutto fakes receiving a call from President Ayub Khan. He then explains how is willing to fight for a thousand years but his President has ordered him to accept the ceasefire.
Classic ZAB. Image
Read 11 tweets
Nov 1, 2019
So 45 years ago the first of two great redistribution’s of wealth away from the Western World was in full flow.
One of these would create a the recipe for some of the greatest unrest so far this century and the other would create a economic superpower.
The first was the 1973 Oil Crisis, when as a consequence of a massive US airlift support for Israel the Arab oil producers cut production and targeted the US and its allies. This would have a big impact on places as far away as Pakistan as you can see here from the OIC summit.
“The price of oil went from around $3 a barrel to about $12. But expressed in today's (2006) dollars, the price went from around $10 a barrel to $40 a barrel. That's a huge increase and the impact on the global economy was devastating.” Image
Read 14 tweets
Dec 11, 2017
Watching the PMLN capitulate on FATA reforms once again, reminds one of the fickle and inward nature of the Sharif brand.
And no this isn’t the first time they’ve initially accommodated reasonable demands by peripheral groups only to leave them in the lurch.
Pretty much par for the course going back as far as 1989.
It follows a predictable course.
The Sharifs come across as humble, not very bright but sincere to the peripheral..meaning non Punjabi (often single issue)groups. They are seen as national leaders, lacking the “feudal” haughtiness of the PPP or hyperbolic self righteousness
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(