1/
You’re staffing a complex patient w/ a learner on your consult team.

As they present it's clear the case was challenging for them.

They get to their assessment & take a breath.

You hit ⏸️ & say…”You know what? Let’s think through this dx together.”

What next?

This week:
2/
Consultants are often asked to assist with diagnosis.

What do we bring to the table?

An easy answer is deeper knowledge of a specific subset of presenting problems & diseases.

Focused clinical exposure means that we develop a unique & rich library of schemas & scripts.
3/
Though specialty-specific knowledge is essential to effective diagnostic reasoning for consultants, it is not enough.

Our unique 'invited' role in cases means we also need to have specific (meta)cognitive skills & habits.

Those skills/habits are part of a teachable process.
4/
Here I’ve depicted a well-established framework for diagnostic reasoning (not specialty-specific).

We may not consciously engage in this process for every case we encounter.

But, analyzing reasoning as a process lets us identify deficiencies & teach more intentionally.
5/
Let’s now analyze some of the steps in this process w/ two specific objectives:

🎯 Identify how a consultant’s knowledge & skills at that step may be unique

🎯 Describe strategies for developing that knowledge/skill to improve diagnostic reasoning
6/
First: Data-gathering

Two 🗝️ consultant skills:
1⃣ Collect data targeted to your specialty & informed by specific diagnostic hypotheses
2⃣"Trust but verify" - this old dogma is actually a useful cognitive forcing strategy to deploy when receiving new consults
7/
How do we instill these habits?

@JenniferSpicer4 discussed specialty-specific frameworks to focus data-gathering in a prior thread


And I've discussed how peppering a consult requester w/ questions you will answer yourself anyway is counterproductive.
8/
Next: Problem representation

This step involves distilling a case to the most diagnostically high-yield information.

Two 🗝️ skills for specialists:
1⃣ Be precise in how data are described
2⃣ Use different formulations of the problem to explore competing diagnostic pathways
9/
Basically, it comes down to naming & framing.

The consult request is one way to formulate the diagnostic problem that needs to be solved. But other formulations may be better.

How do we develop learners to do this effectively?

🔁 By RE-framing cases & thinking “out loud”.
10/
Next: Hypothesis generation

Diagnostic schemas for many subspecialty problems already exist (TY @cpsolvers!).

So, what can consultants add?

1⃣ Richer knowledge of natural history
2⃣ Schemas for problems recalcitrant to usual management
3⃣ Schemas for "endpoint diagnoses”
11/
How do we teach this?

For existing schemas, we can add nuance w/ knowledge of base rate & natural history (e.g., how is this disease supposed to present?)

For cases where ‘usual care’ hasn't worked, we can create schemas using experiential wisdom about how things go wrong.
12/
One more point: Consultants are often asked to help manage a differentiated (read: diagnosed) problem.

But that problem may not be an “endpoint diagnosis” (see pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35942949/).

We thus need to teach schemas that explore etiologic explanations for common problems!
13/
Next: Test interpretation

Consults are often prompted by obscure or equivocal test results.

Reasoning skills we can develop here:
1⃣ How to parse complex results (ex. flow cytometry, discordant HIV Ab/PCR, etc.)
2⃣ Estimating pre/post-test probability
14/
To build this skill, our teaching should derive from the kinds of questions we get.

All these strategies use hypothetical scenarios to:
🤔 Probe how learners are prioritizing diagnoses
🔁 Create opportunities for deliberate practice
📚 Augment disease/management scripts
15/
Finally: Working Dx

Consultants often add value just by clarifying the active problem(s).

Specialty learners need to learn to formulate their working Dx to help teams:
1⃣ Synthesize & prioritize
2⃣ Halt diagnostic/therapeutic momentum
3⃣ Capture the level of uncertainty
16/
How can we teach this?

Notes are an effective medium to model these skills & @JenniferSpicer4 shared one framework:


Re-phrasing the assessment concisely conveys the working dx as you (the teacher) are formulating it.

Some ID examples to illustrate:
17/
Let’s recap:

In this 🧵 we:

📌 Dissected the diagnostic reasoning process & explored unique considerations for specialists.
📌 Identified elements that require intentional development of specific knowledge/skills/habits.
📌 Summarized teaching strategies to build them!
18/
Next week I will continue this series on “Teaching the Consult Team” w/ “Management Reasoning.”

Remember to check out #SubspecialtyTeaching @MedEdTwagTeam & follow @YihanYangMD @GStetsonMD @ChrisDJacksonMD to keep up with all our threads!

See you next week!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Varun Phadke MD

Varun Phadke MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VarunPhadke2

Jan 17
1/
9am. Consults.

Them: “We want you on board because ____ is 'refusing' to do this procedure but ____ says it's needed. You're the tiebreaker.”

You: [sigh] “OK.”

⌛️

Patient: “Ah! ____ said YOU'RE the one holding up my discharge!”

You: 🙄

Feeling triggered yet?

This week: Image
2/
Conflict is inevitable when working within a system.

What do I mean when I say “conflict”? 🤔 For the purposes of this 🧵 let me paraphrase a huge body of literature w/ the following definition:

Conflict is “disagreement” that causes (or has the potential to cause) “harm”.
3/
Let's unpack this a bit more w/ a focus on conflict in consultative care.

"Disagreement" is a broad term.

It can stem from...
↪️ real OR perceived differences in opinion
↪️ about diagnosis OR management
↪️ between the primary team & the consultant OR between consultants
Read 19 tweets
Dec 20, 2022
1/
5pm. ID consults.

On 📞 giving recs re: culture growing Serratia.

Them: TY for seeing our patient!

You: Of course! BTW do you know the hx of Serratia? No? Well let me tell you about Operation Sea-Spray…

⌛️

Them: ...So should we start abx? Which one?

You: 😳

This week: Image
2/
So far @JenniferSpicer4 & I have explored consultant skills pertaining to the consult "ask".

We'll now focus on how to respond to the ask, verbally & through notes.

Let's start w/ a poll of those of you who CALL consults:

What is your PREFERRED way to receive consult recs?
3/
Previous studies suggest that verbal communication of consultant recs – especially initial recs - is preferred by most clinicians.

Additionally, lack of in-person interaction w/ consultants is one factor hospitalists identify as negatively impacting learning & patient care. Image
Read 17 tweets
Dec 7, 2022
1/
Fri. 4PM. You just got consult #8.

Then, a call: "We have a new consult. This patient's been here for 2 weeks. We’re not sure what’s going on & wanted you on board.”

😱

You: "…so, what’s the question…?"

How do we improve this interaction?

This week: Receiving Consults
2/
About 3 yrs ago on a thread about the cognitive aspects of consults I posted this poll:


Nearly 2/3 of >1100 respondents said “anticipated pushback” was the biggest anxiety-inducing factor when calling a consult.

This is a problem.
3/
"Pushback" can be intentional or perceived. Either way it is not a desirable component of consultation (for EITHER side).

This week our focus is the consult request interaction, including its goals & downstream consequences, and strategies to make it more productive.
Read 18 tweets
Nov 22, 2022
1/ Do you reminisce about the days when every learner on your consult team began their rotation w/ you on the SAME day?

When you had to set expectations just once?

And you NEVER, EVER had to repeat yourself?
(Yeah, right 😉)

This week: Setting Expectations on Consult Teams Image
2/ Whenever I want a refresher on setting expectations, I refer to this high-yield previous thread by @GStetsonMD


There you will find lots of pro tips about:
❓ Why we set expectations
❓ What kinds of expectations to set
❓ How to set expectations
3/ I’m not going to rehash those concepts here.

So…what ELSE do subspecialty educators need to know about setting expectations?

Let’s think about some unique considerations (and challenges!) for teachers on consult teams...
Read 17 tweets
Nov 1, 2022
1/ Ready for another #TweetorialTuesday from the @MedEdTwagTeam? Say no more #MedEd #MedTwitter friends!

This week we are launching our series on #SubspecialtyTeaching! Image
2/ If you’re a clinical teacher in a subspecialty & wanted to incorporate pearls from #TweetorialTuesday, you've probably said to yourself (like I did):

WHEN? My days have ZERO predictability
WHAT? My learners are all at a VERY different place
WHO? My team seems to change QOD
3/ In this series @JenniferSpicer4 and I will share strategies for YOU, focusing on teaching as a [sub]specialist.

Our scope:
🌟 Teaching as an inpatient CONSULTANT
🌟 Teaching the CONSULT team (team hoping to provide help)
🌟 Teaching the PRIMARY team (team asking for help)
Read 13 tweets
Feb 29, 2020
1/ “I’ve got a consult for you.”

A standard refrain for subspecialists, but one that often generates significant stress on both ends of the call.

Why?

Q: If you have ever felt anxiety about calling a consult, what was the cause of most of your stress?
2/ Consultation is an indispensable component of medical practice – the field is too vast and new science emerges too rapidly for any one specialty to stay current.

Thus, collegial and effective consultation is essential.
3/ Until recently, most ideas to improve ‘effectiveness’ of consultation focused on ‘mechanics’ & ‘culture’ – timeliness, communication, and professionalism – like the classic “10 Commandments of Effective Consultation”.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6615097/

This is the HOW of consultation.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(