I can summarize the economic portion of Biden’s SOTU in one word: evasion.
President Biden is evading responsibility for the consequences of the anti-freedom, anti-development, anti-fossil-fuel policies he has supported.
Things won’t get better until he’s held accountable.
🧵👇
In the economic portion of his SOTU, @JoeBiden focused on 3 problems: 1) the decline of US industry and infrastructure, 2) the global energy crisis, and 3) the supply chain crisis.
While Biden portrayed himself as the solution to all 3 problems, he is in fact a major cause.
1: Biden’s role in the decline of US industry and infrastructure
Why have US industry and infrastructure declined?
*Because industry and infrastructure require development*—and we have, with Biden’s support, been passing *anti-development environmental policies* for 50+ years.
One of the anti-development environmental policies crippling American industry and infrastructure is the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
The previous administration made some valuable NEPA reforms, which Biden immediately overturned. energytalkingpoints.com/nepa/
In his #SOTU@JoeBiden repeatedly heralded the new infrastructure law. But that law, because it rejected NEPA reform, was actually an *anti-infrastructure* law that makes the projects it supports, along with many, many others, unnecessarily difficult.
The root solution to our industry/manufacturing problems is to *liberate responsible development*. By totally failing to do this, Biden’s “buy American” policies will just subsidize inefficient operations and increase our cost of living even more.
In his #SOTU, @JoeBiden asked “Where is it written that America can’t lead the world in manufacturing again?”
The answer: It is written in the endless anti-development industrial regulations that Biden is only adding to.
2: Biden’s role in the global energy crisis
In his #SOTU@JoeBiden portrayed the global energy crisis as a problem that he is solving. In fact, it’s a problem he has helped cause with anti-fossil-fuel policies—and is making worse with new anti-fossil-fuel policies.
Biden’s sole explanation for the global energy crisis was “Putin’s war.”
But the root cause is global anti-fossil-fuel policies, supported by Biden—which made FF prices artificially high pre-war and prevented the free world from quickly increasing production in response.
Here’s an in-depth explanation I gave at a Congressional off-site last year of how the global anti-fossil-fuel movement, including the Biden administration, caused the global energy crisis—including its major impacts on inflation. alexepstein.substack.com/p/testimony-ho…
As I have documented extensively, had Biden and other Democrats spent the last 3.5 years (including the 2 of the Biden admin) liberating US oil/gas investment, production, and transport instead of strangling them, energy would be far cheaper.
Instead of taking any responsibility whatsoever for the disastrous shortage of fossil fuels today, President “I guarantee you, we’re going to end fossil fuel” Biden continues engaging in a denial campaign that blames everyone but him and his allies.
Biden’s bragging about gasoline prices being “down $1.50 a gallon since their peak” is inane because 1) he helped cause that peak, 2) prices would be lower without his policies, and 3) his only downward influence has been irresponsibly draining the SPR. alexepstein.substack.com/p/how-bidens-a…
Not only has Biden been a significant cause of the global energy crisis, he has taken actions to compound it by 1) passing the disastrous, anti-fossil-fuel “Inflation Reduction Act” and 2) continuing to threaten fossil fuel producers. alexepstein.substack.com/p/the-inflatio…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"this climate thing is a very rigid ideology..." -@joerogan
"It's a religion....Alex Epstein, who wrote Fossil Future, comments about this....The climate pseudoreligion is based on a characterization of nature as...a hapless, defenseless, fragile virgin." -@jordanbpeterson
More on the false view of Earth @jordanbpeterson calls the "fragile virgin" and I call "the delicate nurturer."
Myth: Just a small area of solar panels plus storage can power the world.
Truth: Storing just 3 days of global energy would cost $590 trillion at @elonmusk’s current prices. And the panels would take up more space than all the world’s cities, towns, and villages combined.
🧵👇
We often hear just a small area of solar panels plus storage batteries can power the world.
"Such an obvious move" says @elonmusk about this idea, adding "Even solar plus batteries on a small section of Spain would solve EU energy needs."
This is dangerously false.
Musk says that "to power the whole Earth" we need just solar panels and "some batteries."
What is "some batteries"?
To store a mere 3 days of world energy, to be prepared for weeks (let alone seasons) with lower-than-usual sunlight, takes >1335 terawatt-hours in batteries.
If you want to go to bed on time every night this week, don't start reading @LePortChristina's new thriller, Dissection—which begins with a string of deadly, unusual heart attacks that seem to have no conceivable explanation.
LePort, who is not only a novelist but also a cardiologist, does a masterful job of incorporating ultra-clear explanations of medical science to develop a fascinating medical mystery.
I was hooked from the beginning of Dissection and by the time I was halfway through I found myself going to bed late and waking up early to see how it would end. amazon.com/Dissection-Pol…
Calls to ban gas stoves are anti-science, anti-freedom, and anti-energy
Instead of informing us with accurate science about gas stoves so we can make better decisions, anti-fossil fuel activists are distorting science to justify forcing their anti-gas agenda on us.
🧵👇
Early 2023 has featured a carefully orchestrated campaign in which:
1. A paper whose lead author is an anti-fossil-fuel activist claims that gas stoves cause 12.7% of child asthma. 2. The Federal government and NY proposed bans on new gas stoves.
We should reject this campaign.
The campaign against gas stoves should be rejected for 3 reasons: 1. Families have the right incorporate any real science about gas stoves as they judge best 2. The 12.7% claim is a distortion of science 3. The anti-gas movement is a threat to our grid and therefore our health
Here are 4 essential topics they should take up: 1. Nuclear overregulation 2. Unreliable electricity 3. Lessons of Europe’s energy crisis 4. The "Inflation Reduction Act" disaster
🧵👇
Essential hearing 1: How to Decriminalize Nuclear and Unleash its Full Potential
This hearing would discuss the stalled potential of nuclear energy, what has caused it, and how to fix it.
Fact: Nuclear energy has limitless potential. It is the cleanest and safest form of energy ever devised. And nuclear had a proven track record of being able to provide low-cost, ultra-reliable electricity before hostile government policies made it near impossible.