Taking a moment to reflect on the financial secrecy problems that football continues to refuse to deal with...🧵
There's a lot of great work around at the moment, digging into the questionable finances of their clubs, and those who would acquire them - from @uglygame on crypto sponsors, @SSTInvesting on Morecambe, to @sportingintel@PhilippeAuclair@JosimarFotball on the whole ball game
And just sometimes, there's a win for fans: a dubious would-be owner is sent on their way, a club refuses the filthy lucre of a crypto scam, or - even - a league stands up for meaningful financial fair play.
But you only need a small step back to see that, across the board, fans - and society - are still losing, hand over fist.
There are more fightback wins, yes, but that's because the problems are everywhere.
And these aren't new problems that have suddenly appeared. We can't pretend there's just a natural delay before policies will be in place to fix this.
It's 13 (THIRTEEN) years since the first #taxjustice report on this, published by @christianaid: Blowing the Whistle
Blowing the Whistle highlights the threat of financial secrecy in (UK) football, and how that mirrors the threat of tax abuse globally. Two key fan groups wrote an open letter in the report, calling for urgent action.
The key message is that fans suffer - and society suffers - from the failure to regulate against financial secrecy and its exploitation.
And on that, nothing has changed - except perhaps the scale of the abuse.
The only Scottish team in the top 20 of the 2010 secrecy league table was Rangers, ranked 6th. Within two years, that hundred-year-old institution of the game was no more - bust after pursuing an offshore tax scheme for a decade, finally uncovered by HMRC.
The top two in the Football Financial Secrecy League of 2015, for what it's worth, were Man City (nuff said) and Bolton (since bankrupt). I'm not saying we told you so,* but let no one be in any doubt: financial secrecy is a serious risk factor.
*ok, I am
Next @theoffshoregame published a report into the Scottish Football Association's shocking failures, in allowing Rangers to go bust, 'Doing SFA for Fair Play'.
That report highlighted two issues. First, the long-serving Rangers official who was a central figure in the establishment of one of their tax avoidance schemes, gave misleading evidence to the subsequent inquiry *while he was President of the SFA*(!).
Reader, the inquiry did not strip Rangers of the titles that had been won during the many years of proven tax abuse.
Second, the report showed how the SFA allowed Rangers entry to lucrative European competition when this should clearly have been barred by the outstanding tax issues - thereby robbing another member club of the right to compete.
The Rangers case shows how football authorities' failure to regulate can lead to enormous damage- both to Rangers fans, who lost their club and had to restart from scratch; and to all other fans, who saw the fundamental breach of integrity in their teams' domestic competition.
And still UK football fails to protect fans against dubious practices - from dodgy money and dodgy owners coming in, and from dodgy tax practices and FFP abuses. To say nothing of the likely seriousness of any efforts to defeat match-fixing.
The UK is increasingly perceived as corrupt, and continues to undergo a period of government that is characterised, perhaps above anything substantive or ideological, by a sense of impunity. opendemocracy.net/en/nadhim-zaha…
What hope can fans have for the integrity of even such a simple thing as the game of football?
Politicians - and regulators and clubs - don't see the light, they feel the heat (as the saying has it). Fans need to make sure their voices are clearly heard, to turn the heat up.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The @povinequalscot tax working group is up and running, and we had a great - if somewhat disheartening - first evidence session this week. Here are a few thoughts (mine only) on the challenges that face Scotland, to find a fair tax future... 🧵
A reminder that the work of the working group is made public on an ongoing basis, and you can find the (still open!) call for evidence here also: povertyinequality.scot/about/our-work…
Some useful context is today's report from @TheIFS, which analyses the specific changes that the Scottish Government has made to Scotland's tax and benefit system under devolution: ifs.org.uk/publications/a…
It is inconceivable that the UK government would contract for £70bn of public money, with a company with two (2) employee/directors, filing minimal accounts using the micro company exemption. Isn't it? 👀
Some greater clarity in this thread. The 'framework' contract means micro-firm Place Group would be sitting in the middle, passing on contracts rather than delivering themselves; and the £70bn seems not to be committed funds. Somewhat reassuring, and yet
Extraordinary story from @EmmaAgyemang@FT - the UK government has revealed that it is failing to use automatically exchanged information on foreign financial accounts in order to combat tax abuse of the richest households ft.com/content/a14162…
For HMRC to have access to this data on foreign financial accounts of UK tax residents, and to *not* use it in combination with tax returns to analyse the scale and distribution of tax abuse, is - as the FT quotes me - 'an outright dereliction of its duty'.
As Emma highlights, this refusal to assess tax evasion relates to a stock of some £850 billion held offshore, the great majority in secrecy jurisdictions - so both the locations and the taxpayers (top incomes) are those that research tells us are dominant in tax abusive behaviour
Here's a short funny story about international tax and racism. (Ok, it's not that funny. But it's also about academic impact, and very much worth celebrating.)
On 7 April 2021, President Biden announces he's going to stop companies being "able to hide their income in places like the Cayman Islands and Bermuda, in #taxhavens."
On 13 April, @brooklyntaxprof wrote an open letter: it "may be true, in a sense. But it encapsulated the racism you promised to purge from our discourse. Tax experts you surround yourself with know Switzerland belongs at the top of any list of #taxhavens" thenation.com/article/econom…
Very good news to see the World Bank finally end the ideological nonsense that was its 'Doing Business' rankings. But the report the Bank has published on the reasons why is almost unbelievable - the extent of corruption in the organisation is just mindblowing.
The report is the result of an independent external review which the Bank commissioned (fair play) to look at the revelations about manipulation of the data and rankings in 2018 and 2020. thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/84a922c…
The review points the finger variously at then-President Kim (or aides) & then-CEO Georgieva, who apparently pushed to change results for China- due to concerns over the implications of the country's view of its Doing Business score for the Bank's prospect for capital raising...
OK, the OECD statement is out - and *now* it's clear why so many countries have expressed reservations. oecd.org/tax/beps/state…
Circulating beforehand were suggestions that in pillar 1, over 30% of the 'residual' profit could be apportioned to the sales jurisdiction.
No joy for lower-income countries (or anyone who favours a more ambitious move to curtail arm's length abuse): it's left at "20-30%".
Also floated, the idea that the review period could be reduced to less than 7 (SEVEN) years - just in case it turns out not to deliver anything for lower-income countries.
No joy: "review beginning 7 years after the agreement comes into force" - not even 7 years from now...