1. The @guardian at its anti-Hindu finest, mocking India pushing hug a cow day instead of Valentine's Day being celebrated. "Cow Hug Day is the latest initiative by the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata party (BJP) government". theguardian.com/world/2023/feb…
2. Of course @Independent is not keen to be left behind in this Hinduphobia cess pit phantasmagoria.
3. So for the lefty white racists who give lectures about cow slaughterhouses leads to global warming are offended that pagan savage Hindus are hugging cows by rejecting the western celebration of that Christian fundo Saint Valentine
4. Yet here the Guardian praises an animal charity celebrating anti-Valentines Day. But because it is the west, different standards apply! The day is being criticised for being overly commercialised
6. And here the animal charity RSPCA appeals for the public to help them with funds this Valentine's Day. Guardian and Independent have no problem with this. So are cows in India not animals then? rspca.org.uk/-/news-share-t…
7. In this local newspaper from England animal rescue centre urges give a goat a rose. Well at least they're not those nasty pagan Hindus with their cows that offend left-wing white elite racist readers of the Guardian! shropshirestar.com/entertainment/…
1. The white left-wing elite are so infused with racism, that they see India infected with a caste system which is like apartheid, and a democratic elected government which they lambast as Hindu nationalist and Hindu fascist.
2. All this because of some words written by head of RSS, Gowalkar in the 1930s which seemed to praise Germany. Of course as late as 1937 Churchill praised Hitler, while Daily Mail supported fascism. As indeed di heroes of the Left.
3. In 1935, Churchill expressed "admiration" for Hitler. He praised: “The courage, the perseverance, and the vital force which enabled him to...overcome all the...resistances which barred his path.” Daily Mail owner even met the nazi leader. As did the abdicated king
1. The white left-wing elite neo-racist colonialists construct this myth of Hindu fascism and Hindu nationalism based upon a few words RSS leader Gowalkar wrote in the 1930s supposedly praising Nazi Germany. Yet these same detractors would have done the same had they been alive
2. Nazism and fascism were seen as progressive ideologies. Indeed as FA Hayek in Road to Serfdom realised, communism and fascism overlapped. That explains why Stalin allied with Hitler for 2 years, the very same Stalin admired by antifa.
3. Hitler had himself briefly flirted with communist revolutionaries in 1918 and hence was familiar with their ideas and methodology. He merely replaced the language of class with that of volk and race.
1. Here BBC Radio 4's File on 4 blames Hindu extremism for the street jihad against Hindus in Leicester last year bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0…
2. Then we have that notorious 'documentary' on Modi by the same BBC which got banned in India
3. In 2006 William Dalrymple had his own series on India, where this latter day white supremacist couched his racist views in pretending to love India, saying it should return to its Sufi Islamic roots to fight HIndu extremism
1. BBC at it again, stirring up hatred in India with specific focus on targeting Hindus. So now Shri Rama is responsible for anything nasty that happens to women and Dalits. What is it with the BBC that it has become some sort of nazi propaganda mouthpiece?
2. More important let us ask what will be the results of these constant attacks, demonising Modi, India and Hindus? It will create the very Hindu reaction which the BBC and similar decry as Hindu nationalism. So how will this work out? After the Cold War western powers got smug.
3. Having incapacitated Yeltsin in charge of Russia meant a luck few plundered national resources while the masses coped with hyper inflation, plummeting living standards, mafia control and a massive blow to national self respect with the demise of the USSR.
1. Why is media so against India and Hindus? I mean when they get attacked they get blamed. In Leicester media almost universally blamed Hindu extremists and treated Majid Freeman and Muhammad Hijab as mainstream voices on the pogrom.
2. When Hindus get killed in Kashmir the media keeps the religious angle hidden or marginalised. And if you complain they prolong the issue or just outright silence you. In 1976 the Soweto riots broke out because apartheid South Africa enforced teaching in Afrikaans on Africans.
3. The ruling whites were not interested that the natives preferred English. They wanted better servants not better educated masses. So same with this left-wing white elite when it comes to Hindus. They don't want informed opinion but a brainwashed neo colonialist agenda.
1. controversy around Andrew Tate a recent convert to Islam being allegedly accused of human trafficking, rapein Romania the Independent ensured that an article from a Muslim writer made it clear that his 'misogynist' behaviour had nothing to do with his newfound faith .
2. But then again and again we Tate being referred to as Guru who is a teacher in Hindu tradition. So why the double standards ?
3. When HHR complained to the Independent about taking the word out and apologising to the Hindu community they get a reply from their managing editor Richard Best who claims their use of guru was in its secular context, detaching it from the Hindu source.