Post

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

@TheRealVerbz

Feb 11, 2023 • 36 tweets • 25 min read • Read on X

Scrolly

In this thread, I'll introduce the brilliant work of Dr. Edward Dowdye.
Credible Challenges to General & Special Relativity, Doppler Shift Theory & more.
If Einstein were alive today, he would concede to Dr. Dowdye's scientific evidence and mathematical proofs.
#BlackHistory

The brilliant work of Dr. Edward Dowdye
web.archive.org/web/2022012216…

Why Should We Question Relativity? (FAQs)
web.archive.org/web/2022010508…

Optics, Electrodynamics & Gravitation based from Re-Worked classic physics/ Galilean Transformations under Euclidean Space
drive.google.com/file/d/1hxvzGr…

16 Peer Reviewed Papers by Dr. Dowdye.
Hosted by NASA and Harvard:
ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/search/q=dowdy…

Propagation and Re-Emission of Light:
web.archive.org/web/2016033114…

Natural Philosophy Bio:
wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?titl…

More background for Dr. Dowdye:
sciencewoke.org/scientist/dr-e…

Plasma Physics - Flaws & Corrections:
photos.app.goo.gl/UMtr6CvhttWXET…

Double Slit Re-Emission Explanation:
web.archive.org/web/2021090621…

Inelastic collision and Conservation of Kinetic Energy
web.archive.org/web/2022012022…

More regarding collisions and center of gravity.
web.archive.org/web/2016033115…

Gauss’ Law of Gravity:
web.archive.org/web/2021090609…

Gravitational Lensing in Empty Vacuum Space Does Not Take Place:
naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/…

An Ideal Inelastic Collision Model using Center-of-Mass Frames Shows Conservation of Kinetic Energy
naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/…

The Shapiro Delay: A Frequency Dependent Transit-Time Effect
naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/…

Gravitational Light Bending History is Severely Impact-Parameter Dependent:
naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/…

Dr. Dowdye's work dismantles Albert Einstein's Relativity.
Gravitational Potential Gradients and Refraction in Space #BlackHistoryMonth
rumble.com/vbtco9-dr.-edw…

NASA Engineer Disproves Claims of Light Bending by Relativity. #BlackHistoryMonth
Stars Bend Light by Refraction, Not Gravity:
rumble.com/vbtccv-refract…

Dr. Edward Dowdye corrected over 120 years of Einstein's flaws.
#BlackHistoryMonth

Dr. Dowdye discusses the misconception of #GPS and atomic clocks that are said to validate Relativity.

Ron Hatch - GPS Co-Inventor and internationally recognized expert of 50 years disputes Relativity. Wrote a Book called "Escape from Einstein" which details how GPS has nothing to do with Relativity.
gps.gov/governance/adv…

Dr. Essen - Atomic Clock Inventor Rejects Relativity
naturalphilosophy.org/site/harryrick…

Relativity & PopScience Mythology
alternativephysics.org/book/GPSmythol…

Paul Marmet - GPS & Illusion of Constant Light Speed
newtonphysics.on.ca/illusion/

The Collapse of Lorentz Transformations
newtonphysics.on.ca/lorentz/index.…

Ron was friends with Dr Dowdye. Ron was going to rewrite his book Escape From Einstein to correct his errors but died before he got a chance. Ron still used a luminiferous aether to distort packets rather than re-emissions of secondaries without need for Aether or 4th Dimension.

When Albert Einstein published his General Theory of Relativity (GR) in 1915, he proposed three critical tests... insisting in a letter to the Times of London that if Any one of these three proved to be wrong at any time in the future... the whole theory would collapse.

Alternative to the Perihelion of Mercury & Radio Binary Pulsar System (PSR) 1913 +1916 under Classic Physics.
Mass remains constant in Galilean Electrodynamics.
The mathematical equivalent to Relativistic procedures yielding the same predictions & solutions without Relativity.

Alternative to Gravitational Redshift and more by Dr. Edward Dowdye
#BlackHistoryMonth

I put all the slides from my presentation (and more) into 1 article.
Challenging Relativity and current models of Gravity.
Complete with equations, video links and corroborating material.
Lists of References, Citations and Peer Reviews included at the end.
steemit.com/science/@verbz…

Understanding the differences between Relativity (Lorentz Transformations) vs Effectivity (Galilean Transformations)
Dr. Edward Dowdye reformulated Classical physics equations that yield the same predictions and solutions as Relativity but without need for #Relativity at all.

The consequences of re-interpreting all past experiments and observations under Galilean Transformations is catastrophically devastating to #Relativity and over 100 years of accepted "facts".

It's the duty of the scientific community and all "peers" to acknowledge & understand a new model that yields the same predictions and solutions as Realtivity, but in a more simplistic and elegant manner. EVERY alleged "proof" of Relativity can be dismantled and reinterpreted.

Alternative to Gravitational RedShift from Dr. Edward Dowdye. Using only elementary math & Galilean Transformations. Einstein said, if there were any other methods able to derive the same predictions and solutions at any time in the future… that relativity would not be needed.

Some challenges to Gravitational Lensing based upon real observations and data collected from #NASA satellites.

Actual observations over 14 years by the Max Planck Institute showing NO Lensing whatsoever and NO distortion whatsoever. Relativity simulations insist we SHOULD see rings of light as stars pass behind an alleged #BlackHole
The depictions by Relativity have NEVER been observed.

@elonmusk

@elonmusk When I post a clear HD GIF or video clip... it is butchered by Twitter's compression of the file.

Light only Refracts at the boundary of a celestial body. Light does NOT progressively bend around a celestial body as depicted by Relativity's model of gravity and non-existent space-time curvature.
When you shine a light at a glass lens, the light bends ONLY AT the surface.

Hopefully Twitter compression doesn't pixelate these next couple tweets...

Gauss' Law of Gravity applied to the Solar Plasma Limb.

Gravity does not bend light. Nor does gravity have ANY direct effect on electromagnetic radiation as Relativity depicts. The effect is only INDIRECT.

Challenges to Gravitational Lensing & More:
web.archive.org/web/2021090706…

Gauss’ Law of Gravity:
web.archive.org/web/2021090609…

Gravitational Lensing does not exist.
#Einstein Rings do not exist.

The most commonly used phrase I hear when trying to discuss these topics is, "That's above my pay grade."

Who is willing to step their game up and spend the time to understand these credible challenges that can change the entire world's understanding of Space, Time, Matter, Energy, Gravity and Light?!

Checkmating #chatgpt3 in 2 minutes or less. Can't wait for #chatgpt4 to have wider access to material that I can sort through.
Been waiting for funding to hire graphic designers to make visualizations out of my diagrams and Dr. Dowdye/ Petr Beckmann's challenges to Relativity.

@elonmusk

@elonmusk I would love to help program #truthgpt
It is crucial to have heretical and credible challenges to current Scientific models. if there is another way to yield the same predictions and solutions… But with an easier method, it should not be banned or censored.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

More from @TheRealVerbz

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

@TheRealVerbz

Aug 15

Current nuclear theory suggests that you can only extract 0.063 watts of power from 1 gram of Strontium-90. A man named Dr. Paul M. Brown developed something called the Resonant Nuclear Battery. The technology can extract 7500 watts from that same gram of Strontium-90. That's over 100,000 times more energy than what is claimed is possible.

In late 1980s, Dr. Brown patented a resonant nuclear battery and successfully demonstrated a 75 watt prototype. It used a 2 millimeter long Strontium-90 needle to produce electricity comparable to NASA's Plutonium based RTGs which produce 0.54 watts per gram.
rumble.com/v28pjnu-dr-pau…

Brown died under mysterious circumstances just before his company NuCell was set to launch on the stock market. His partner and attorney Phil Talbert was witness to his efforts and stifling and wrote a book called The Half Life of a Nuclear Battery.

Apparatus for direct conversion of radioactive decay energy to electrical energy:
patents.google.com/patent/US48354…

Alpha-Beta Voltaic Effect – NuCell Resonant Nuclear Battery:
rexresearch.com/nucell/nucell.…

The Half-Life of a Nuclear Battery – Amazon:
tinyurl.com/2zsnp4zk

Dr. Brown attempted to communicate with John Searl in the 1980s. He wrote 13 letters to John Searl because Paul Brown said he had built his own SEG unit called the DPU (Demonstration Power Unit) using a Strontium-90/Neodymium alloy.

Here is one letter: drive.google.com/drive/folders/…

A man named Mark LeClair, of Nanospire, Inc, built a cavitation device in his garage for $250 that generated nuclear radiation and formed diamonds. (using only water, images of the results included in the first link below). He and his business partner were severely radiation poisoned for more than a year, lost their hair and almost died.

I was fortunate enough to host the Global Breakthrough Energy Movement Conference in Boulder, Colorado in 2013 where I introduced LeClair's presentation. Brilliant guy. (He kinda looks like Stew from The Hangover.)
Mark solved a 100 year old cavitation erosion equation mystery.

So... if Mark LeClaire found a method to generate nuclear radiation from cavitation of water in a closed cycle... and Dr. Paul Brown in the first post could directly convert the nuclear radiation to electrical current... then why not combine both of these concepts to bypass the need for nuclear reactors and refining fuel rods to ultimately just boil water and make steam?
That's only up to 30% efficient anyway.

The direct conversion of radioactive decay to electric output would be a big blow to the nuclear industry... As would the production of nuclear energy from water and the subsequent conversion of that on-demand.

Cavitation Experiment/ Results/ Theory of RNA & DNA Synthesis and LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions): drive.google.com/file/d/1AYj6Mg…

Take this viral - LeClair's Cavitation Experiments: drive.google.com/file/d/1Y6Q-0H…

WebArchive discussion of LeClair's claims and experiments:
drive.google.com/file/d/1Nu-Ski…

3rd Party Replication?: drive.google.com/file/d/1O_jJNG…

Cavitation Implosion Compared to Nuclear Explosion In Reverse:
rumble.com/vbuqfx-cavitat…

The concept behind Dr. Brown's resonant nuclear battery is that it harnesses the radioactive decay to generate power at a constant based on the half-life of that material.

A standard American household requires up to 10kW of energy available for all combined appliances on at the same time in the home and accounting for spikes when turning on an off the vacuum or something like that.
Let's say 15kW to play it safe.

Strontium-90 has a half-life of 28 years. 1 gram can deliver 7500 watts at a constant. Adding mass means additive power.
2 grams can deliver 15kW.

That would require just 2 grams of Strontium-90 to power your house at a constant for 28 years before needing to replace the 2 grams because the battery would only be half as effective after the 28 years.
(It wouldn't be a sudden jump but rather a slow depletion and at the 28 year mark, the battery would deliver half the power as it did the day it was first started.)

Effectively turning the half-life of a radioactive material into a battery for the half-life of the material.

So... if you have carbon 14 with a 10,000 year half-life or something ridiculous like Thorium with a 14 Billion year half life... That would mean you could power your house at a constant for 10,000 years or at a constant for 14 billion years with just a minuscule amount of mass for fuel.

But if you do something exotic in a coherent state and deplete that energy too much, the half-life might be reduced from 10,000 years to 100 years. Or 1 year, or 1 hour depending on how that energy is converted and for what purpose.
The point is that there's much more energy that can be harnessed in ways that mainstream models cannot fathom how it's possible.

Because the mainstream models are wrong. You can't violate thermodynamics. You can only violate people's misunderstanding of thermodynamics.

Read 6 tweets

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

@TheRealVerbz

Feb 25, 2023

In this thread I'll present info on #Nanobubbles, their fantastic properties and how they can help clean the #OhioChemicalDisaster ... and more!
This technology is mainly in Japan. I've tried for years to get others in the US to pay attention, form businesses and help people.

Had to reupload these vids to #rumble because #YouTube says it's MEDICAL MISINFORMATION...
When enough nanobubbles latch onto an impurity in a body of water... the impurity will rise to the surface to form a scum. Vacuum off and you have pristine water. rumble.com/v1cfj6d-cleani…

#Nanobubbles can be used to clean Algae Blooms and Red Tides. Again, bringing all the suspended impurities to the surface which can be skimmed off and safely removed. Leaving the total volume of water clear and clean and full of oxygen for the sea life.
rumble.com/vbv8l9-oxygen-…

Read 13 tweets

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

@TheRealVerbz

Aug 15, 2022

There was no Big Bang. Redshift and the Z measurement is completely misconceived. Here is just a fraction of the evidence presented by Eric Lerner. In this thread, I will post over 30 detailed sources to substantiate.

plasma-universe.com/eric-lerner/

The self-noise of the telescope named “ROT-54/2.6” is 2.6K.
(ROT Stands for Radio Optical Telescope.
It is 54 meters in diameter. And it generates a heat signature of 2.6 Kelvin.)

This is by far the most sensitive radio telescope ever built...

Read 64 tweets

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

@TheRealVerbz

Oct 5, 2021

SEG Voltage Controlled Homopolar MockUp Demo 10V @ 2 amps = 8 lbs moving 200 orbital RPM/ 1450 Centripetal RPM.
See comments for detailed explanations.
Consider it as a hydroelectric dam on the quantum scale. The "media" is the internal kinetic energy of electrons. #GreenEnergy