Sr Adv Manan Kumar Mishra: All High Courts or atleast HC bar associations should be made party. At the moment the infrastructure is not fit to accomodate this
CJI DY Chandrachud: why don't you ask report from state bar associations on their take and inform us. Centre has approved the 7,000 crores for phase 3 e courts protect. This can be used to make technology available to the lawyers
CJI: Technology has to be for the inclusion and not exclusion. We have to think of the bottom layer of the pyramid also and not only the top that you see here
CJI: What is most disturbing to see is that some Chief Justices of High Courts are doing away with technology set up for virtual hearings. This is not how you deal with public money. It is not that you are technology friendly or not. But you cannot do away with the infrastructure
CJI: We have entered into the a memorandum of understanding with common service centres so that our e courts facilities are available even at the village levels.
CJI: Technology is not for the pandemic and is for here to stay. Some judges say that we come to court then why can't lawyers. That begs the point they judges and lawyers operate in a very different atmosphere.
CJI: As a chairperson of the e committee I am deeply concerned that no one should be left behind.
Adv Siddharth R Gupta: In case of HC of Madhya Pradesh let hybrid be there atleast for the HC level
CJI: The Parliamentary committee had come to the Supreme Court and as a puisine judge I made a 3 hours long representation. On that basis funds were allocated. They were very receptive. Now High Court Chief Justices will have to take this ahead.
CJI: Problem is some Chief Justice say they like technology and some say they don't. Now I am gonna make sure that all falls on line and are on equal board. You are savvy or not get acquainted with it.
CJI: We have also started e SCR project and making judgments available in local languages
CJI: we will formulate and pass orders. We have to ensure that nobody is left behind due to technology. #SupremeCourt
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Five-judge Constitution bench to hear a batch of petitions filed by rival factions Uddhav Thackeray and Chief Minister Eknath Shinde in relation to the Maharashtra political crisis
Sr Adv Harish Salve: I am using the i-pad. I am opposing the reference. This was an anti defection law and not anti dissent law. From the time of Mr Palkhiwala it was contended that it becomes an anti dissent law #SupremeCourt@OfficeofUT#SupremeCourtOfIndia
Salve: Unless the court comes to a startling conclusion that the notice pending before the speaker is transferred to Supreme Court under Article 142 or members get disqualified as soon a plea for disqualification is filed #SupremeCourt@OfficeofUT#SupremeCourtOfIndia
Urgent application seeking a stay on the demolition of Sarai Kale Khan Night shelter in Delhi to be mentioned before CJI DY Chandrachud led bench
The application states that demolition is going on and it houses 50 homeless residents of the city #SupremeCourt
Adv Prashant Bhushan: Last evening demolition of the night shelter was ordered in Sarai Kale Khan. Demolitions was preponed and since they knew that we will mention the case they are doing it now. Please see the pictures. We need immediate orders #SupremeCourtOfIndia
CJI DY Chandrachud: Mention the case before Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Dipankar Dutta right now
Kerala High Court is hearing the plea moved by advocate Saiby Jose Kidangoor to quash the FIR registered against him for allegedly collecting huge sums of money from his clients under the pretext of using it to bribe judges of the High Court
At the previous hearing, Justice Kauser Edappagath had asked Kidangoor why he is afraid that told him that it's better to let the investigation happen so that the truth can come out barandbench.com/news/why-are-y…
Justice Kauser Edappagath to hear the matter today as well.
Sr. Adv S Sreekumar appears for Kidangoor
Sreekumar confirms that the judge has received a copy of the preliminary enquiry report of the police
Five-judge Constitution bench to hear a batch of petitions filed by rival factions Uddhav Thackeray and Chief Minister Eknath Shinde in relation to the Maharashtra political crisis
Sr Adv Harish Salve: on the correctness of Nabam Rebia, this case has been relied on by the petitioner and they said that on the basis of the judgment new speaker should not have decided it. I am not on merits, a judgment they are relying on is the one they are questioning now
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: working of the 10th schedule has unfortunately worked to advantage political immorality. Nabam Rebia says when notice is issued to speaker seeking his removal that very moment he cannot act as tribunal under 10th schedule #SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia
#SupremeCourt hears plea directions to the SEBI and the Union Home Ministry to conduct an inquiry and register a First Information Report (FIR) against founder of Hindenburg Research, Nathan Anderson, and his associates in India for its recent report on Adani Group
SG Tushar Mehta: I have instructions that SEBI is completely equipped to deal with what has happened. But Government has no objection to committee. But remit of committee is important since it has an effect internationally and if we can suggest remit of committee in sealed cover
SG Tushar Mehta: We don't want to undermine the expertise of the regulator
CJI DY Chandrachud: Please come on Friday and inform us about the remit of the committee so that we have something in front of us
Supreme Court adjourns AAP’s mayoral candidate Shelly Oberoi plea seeking judicial intervention a day after the mayoral polls were stalled for the third time in a month
CJI DY Chandrachud: Delegation of US judges here. We have to meet them. List this on Friday #SupremeCourt
CJI: Nominated members cannot go for election. That is very clear.
Adv Shadan Farasat: polls to Mayor, Deputy mayor and standing committee is being held together.