PS - I like the pandemic guidance coming from @TheWHN, the scientists & engineers who continue to stand up to WHO, the professional engineering societies who are starting to weigh in, & the grassroots organizations & citizens advocating for better prevention.
In fact, I prefer the guidance of 1918 to today's guidance from @WHO, ID & Public Health.
If you can extract $1M in funding to perform an ill-designed study deemed by many to be unethical that ignores previous science while supporting a contested healthcare policy, a lawsuit, & a career long ideology now known to the world to be wrong, it raises some questions.
Maybe there's more of a connection to the funders than has been disclosed? 🤷♂️
Maybe there's more behind the study initiative & study design than science?
🤷♂️
A little more 'Engineered Infection Prevention' (EIP) for anyone who may be interested.
This time water.
Did you know that with a bit of electricity & a catalyst you could split water molecules into OH-, H2O2, O- & O3 (ozone), collectively referred to as ROS, Reactive Oxygen Species?
Did you know ROS was a powerful disinfectant?
(And did you know ROS is also produced in your cells?)
"The most significant risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection was room sharing with an infectious patient, which was the only factor that remained statistically significant following multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR], 9.2"