Attacks like those in Knowsley aren't because of "concerned parents". They are down to a rising, coordinated, far-right campaign, and it is emboldened by the rhetoric and misinformation about asylum seekers spread by certain politicians and press. #r4today thetimes.co.uk/article/f28528…
Plenty of people have tried to make out attacks against asylum seekers are all down to "legitimate concerns". They aren't. There is nothing "legitimate" about #KnowsleyRiots, and nothing "legitimate" about far-right thugs going after people seeking safety.
Spurred on by language, such as used by the Home Secretary, their claims that the people in hotels aren't "genuine refugees" are easily and rapidly debunked by the Home Office's own data, which shows how vast majority are recognised as needing protection. gov.uk/government/sta…
There's rampant misinformation on social media about asylum seekers, but it's regurgitated by certain sections of the media, and actively promoted by several "think tanks", despite all evidence showing it is nonsense. That makes it easier for the far-right to radicalise people.
All of this is made worse by the almost "normalisation" of the far-right. The Prevent Review denying the threat, attacks put down as "lone wolves" or "concerned citizens", even notable Gender Critical people supporting them because their views align against trans individuals.
Minorities are being targeted from every direction. They are used as political footballs. All of that provides the far-right to pretend that they are just following "mainstream" thoughts, and speaking for the "silent majority". They aren't and they need tackling now.
To tackle them though it needs for the media to stop uncritically regurgitating false information. It needs for people to stop sharing easily disprovable lies. It needs for human rights to apply to all and not be "disapplied" to certain groups or on certain circumstances.
There is no excuse for aligning with far-right individuals on a "limited basis", because you agree with them on that topic. All that does is "legitimise" the rest of their views and give them cover.
There also needs to stop being this whole "gotcha" attitude from people when they find a story about someone who is part of a minority committing a crime. Every group will have nasty people, you can't blame a whole minority for their actions.
And on a final, purely practical note, regarding the #KnowsleyRiots. It is pretty hard to argue that a protest which was being organised days before by a known far-right group was actually "concerned parents" responding to an unverified video on the day. independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Dear God @grantshapps please learn at least the basics before speaking. Carrier liability fines prevent asylum seekers using commercial routes, and NO-ONE CHOOSES TO BE TRAFFICKED. This is where knowing the difference between trafficking and smuggling would be helpful for an MP.
The UK has very few, highly limited, government approved resettlement routes, which is why people have to make small boat crossings. It is the only way for many to seek asylum in the UK, and their right not to be penalised for manner of entry is guaranteed under international law
That by the way doesn't change on jot of the UK leaves the European Convention on Human Rights. It would also take leaving the Convention relating to the status of refugees and several other treaties which prohibit "refoulement", returning people to unsafe countries.
Politics aside, yes, you know what, a ceasefire would be good. You know what else, Russia is actively engaged in committing a fricking genocide in Ukraine. Not arming Ukraine only ends the war in one way, with Russia finishing that genocide. Putin has made that pretty damn clear.
"War is bad" is a pretty universally agreed thing, and you can make any comment you want about "Western interventionism", but it still remains fairly widely agreed. "Whataboutsim" doesn't work though. It is possible to say "this aggressor is bad" without saying that one is good.
We have seen the way Putin's tactics work in Syria et al. Like it or not, and no there is nothing about war to be celebrated, just letting Russia walk over a country is not a solution. Already we are seeing Ukrainian children being "forcibly adopted". That is genocide.
I get that it is easy to say "why isn't the news just covering the stories which interest me", but I have been shocked by how little, overall, coverage 200 missing children has received, obviously aside from #r4today's segment suggesting they were "willingly trafficked". 1/
Even when it has been covered, a lot of coverage has made out this is a new issue, when it has been going on for a very long time, and that it is the fault of Albanians. If this was 200 British children it would be front page news and Ministerial resignations would abound. 2/
Yesterday's protests were important, but they haven't really been mentioned. Instead, as the Home Office knew would happen, the story rolls on. Talking heads try and claim those missing may not have been children, or may have been complicit in their exploitation. 3/
There are many reasons why plans to place asylum seekers in blatantly unsuitable accommodation like this, are seriously flawed, but "pressure on local children's services" is just a NIMBY argument which ignores that those services need investment as well. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
I would also suggest that @BBCNews should point out when the @ukhomeoffice provides misleading information in their quotes. While there has been an increase in channel crossings, we have not seen a commensurate rise in over asylum applications...
This is pretty obvious, as other routes have closed people are forced into making more dangerous ones journeys. It does not explain, when overall numbers of applications have remained relatively stable, why the government has allowed the back log of applications to grow so much..
Thread: No matter how loudly certain people shout about "turning boats around in the channel", "send them back to France" etc, the simple fact is that you cannot return people to a country you don't have an agreement to do so with. 1/ #r4today theguardian.com/world/2023/jan…
The Rwanda plan, which itself is being challenged on its legality, only has capacity for sub-200 even if the government tried it. That means that all this talk about "returning anyone crossing the channel" is meaningless posturing. 2/
All of that is before you factor in how the UK is already not a main destination for asylum seekers, so the, actually pretty small, number who do seek it here are doing so for reasons, primarily family ties or language, which don't change no matter how much you shout. 3/
When I was growing up I flipped between saying I was gay or straight, because I didn't know you could be bi. More people identifying as trans and non-binary shows we are getting better at recognising the diversity around us. It isn't a negative. It's something to be encouraged.
I got massively messed up, and heavily bullied, because no-body told me you could actually be bi. It was always made out you had to be gay or straight. That's being replicated with this whole manufactured panic about trans and non-binary individuals.
It is only by recognising that people do identify in different ways, and providing supportive environments for them to do so, that we can actually protect children. This rehashing of the same rehashing of the way homophobia was "normalised" in the 80's and before just causes harm