In an uncharacteristically bold move, Tory just announced some YIMBY planning reform. This must continue.
Unfortunately, city staff aren’t up for it. Today: planning agrees that the new downtown waterfront Villiers neighbourhood can be 30% more dense. In fact it should be 100% more. secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda…
Planning is still committed to a bunch of nonsense aesthetics that mean lower buildings and less housing. They do not, and seemingly will never, acknowledge that this is a crisis.
Toronto City Planning simply does not get it. Safe to assume their responses will continue to be lukewarm and incremental.
This is absurd.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Mark Sutcliffe: “Downtown could be a 15-minute neighborhood and Barrhaven could be a 15-minute neighbourhood.” One of these things is true, and the other is absolutely not. Barrhaven:
If the city decentralizes, a low-density, car-oriented exurb like Barhaven will not just acquire any of the qualities of the “15-Minute City.” Neighbourhood retail and services are very hard to run in a place like that.
Big news in Toronto housing politics. The mayor’s actually-quite-bold 2023 Housing Action Plan: app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgen…
On a high level, this represents a huge change in rhetoric and attitude. The mayor of Toronto committing to “achieve or exceed” high targets of building new housing.
(As recently as last week, the city’s chief planner was arguing they’ve done a great job because they *approve* large numbers of new homes. This is defensive and seriously misleading.)
@OntarioPlace Any claim that this project is paying its own way, or "footing the bill" for parkland, is not true. The gov't wi,l pay $200m to remediate the site and $100m for parking. At least.
And that's *before* any money the government puts into fitting out or programming the existing buildings. The real public expense here could easily be half a billion dollars.
The reality: provincial planning calls for Toronto to intensify, as it should, and Toronto city hall has spent 20 years resisting. It has refused to update its plan and zoning in a coherent and comprehensive way.
Councillor Matlow makes some good points about big projects. But it’s also true that an apartment building next to a subway should be “cookie-cutter.” In Toronto it’s not, because councillors don’t want it to be.
From Victoria: Double Header House by Darcy Jones Architect, an extraordinary building. Front-and-back duplex for an extended family; frugal construction and spatial complexity that recalls Gehry’s Santa Monica House.
Kitchens in the front and back units, facing opposite directions.