Breaking: US District Judge Robert Pitman has ruled that Texas's pre-Roe abortion bans are no longer good law and has barred defendant prosecutors from enforcing them.

More to come ...
It is a mixed ruling. Paxton was dismissed, and more recent laws (H.B. 1280 and S.B. 8) were not enjoined.

This all comes in a case about discussing, funding, and supporting out-of-state abortions (Fund Texas Choice v. Paxton).

The 52-page ruling: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
It's a complicated case with a complicated ruling, but Pitman does an excellent job of summarizing the ruling up top. I'd encourage you to read it. Before the Court is a motion for a preliminary injunction br
Here is Pitman's description of why this case was brought. As I said above, it's about discussing and funding abortions and helping people to obtain out-of-state abortions — and fears of in-state prosecution for those actions. This case concerns several non-profit Texas abortion funds a
While Paxton was dismissed from the suit, it's important to see why: Pitman ruled that Paxton had no enforcement authority under the pre-Roe laws or SB8 and that HB1280 does not even "arguably" allow prosecutions related to out-of-state abortions. Paxton’s motion to dismiss proceeds in two parts. First, P
As to HB1280 (Texas's so-called "trigger law") specifically, Pitman notes that, while politicians including Paxton have made threats about extra-territorial enforcement, that's not what the law says. (Pp. 28-29.) ... Regardless of whether Texas has an “interest” in pro
Note that Pitman drops a "what if they try anyway" footnote, saying, more or less, "come back if they try it." While the Court dismisses Plaintiffs’ H.B. 1280 claims wit
So, what happened?
* Paxton is dismissed (b/c he can't enforce pre-Roe bans or SB8, and HB1280 doesn't apply to abortions out of Texas)
* Local prosecutors are enjoined from enforcing pre-Roe abortion bans (even though, and b/c, they have already been repealed by implication)
This does not change abortion rights on the ground in Texas, but it does provide a ruling that backs those in Texas who are supporting people seeking out-of-state abortions — with an injunction against prosecutors using pre-Roe bans and a strong court ruling on HB1280's limits.
For more of my work and to support my up-to-the-minute legal reporting, subscribe to @lawdorknews now: lawdork.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chris “Subscribe to Law Dork!” Geidner

Chris “Subscribe to Law Dork!” Geidner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @chrisgeidner

Feb 22
Breaking: #SCOTUS will not stop Florida from carrying out its first execution since the summer of 2019. Tomorrow, Florida is scheduled to kill Donald Dillbeck. There were no noted dissents. (ORDER LIST:  598 U.S.) WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2023      CE
Notably, Dillbeck was sentenced to death after a murder conviction — but only an 8-4 death sentence recommendation. Dillbeck was, in part, asking #SCOTUS to consider and rule on whether a unanimous jury is required in the penalty phase to impose the death sentence.
This 8-4 sentencing rule is what DeSantis has proposed Florida adopt in its capital cases: theguardian.com/us-news/2023/j…

It has not, however, been Florida's practice in recent years due to both US and Florida supreme court decisions: vox.com/policy-and-pol…
Read 5 tweets
Feb 22
As if we don’t have enough going on this week already, we will be getting one or more opinions from the Supreme Court in a few minutes, at 10a. The opinion announcement audio, unlike arguments, will not be livestreamed. #SCOTUS
The first opinion, by Barrett, is in Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, a bankruptcy case. The decision is unanimous, but Sotomayor concurred, joined by Jackson. supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf… KATE MARIE BARTENWERFER, PE...
Read 16 tweets
Feb 21
This is such a bullshit, self-excusing line.
Only people intentionally seeking to subvert a clear understanding of journalism — and, specifically, the power of The New York Times when it comes to agenda-setting and narrative-changing — would dismiss legitimate questions about coverage by saying they're not activists.
The letter I signed was not asking for the journalists to be activists. It is asking for better, more accurate, more responsible journalism. It is seeking journalism that contextualizes coverage, both within stories and in coverage decisions.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 21
Of course the letter was organized by Jeremy Peters.
Many unsurprising names, some disappointing names, some disappointing-but-unsurprising names, in a letter that builds off of the dismissive response of Joe Kahn.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 21
#SCOTUS is back today. We’ll be getting orders from last Friday’s conference in 15 minutes at 9:30a ET, followed at 10a ET by oral arguments in the big Section 230 internet algorithm case, Gonzalez v. Google.
The Supreme Court grants no new cases today.
Read 28 tweets
Feb 13
Lol. I guess the remaining engineer who doesn’t want to be fired changed the algorithm so more people would be forced to see El*n’s tweets. 🤡 Image
Also: Damn you, @mat and @bendreyfuss, for giving them this excuse. 🤣
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(