A large incel forum survey found that 71.5% of the respondents reported being on the autism spectrum: nationalpost.com/news/inside-th…
Another survey found that 18% had an official diagnosis, while a whopping 74% were self-diagnosed. Regardless of the level of accuracy to these self-diagnoses, it shows at the least that autism-like social difficulties are unsurprisingly highly prevalent in this community.
This massive overrepresentation also carries over 'incel-related' mass killers turning out to have been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder.
Beginning with the infamous Elliot Rodger, who was diagnosed with PDD-NOS (another defunct subtype of autism) in 2007.
The anonymous hacker known as 4chan also revealed that he asked Yahoo Answers whether he was allowed to buy a gun in California while having receiving benefits for 'mild autism and anxiety'.
Next up Alek Minassian, who spergily proclaimed: "The Incel Rebellion has already begun! We will overthrow all the Chads and Stacys! All hail the Supreme Gentleman Elliot Rodger!"
He was also diagnosed with autism, for which he attended a special needs school.
Then we have Jake Davison, another certified sped who was diagnosed with autism as a child, and who expressed dismay about being an 'unemployed, autistic, poor, sexually frustrated male with tons of health issues'.
Nikolas Cruz, who also praised Elliot Rodger, writing in a YouTube comment: "Elliot Rodger will not be forgotten", was diagnosed as 'developmentally delayed' in 2002, and in a 2016 report was reported to suffer from depression, ADHD, and autism.
Chris Harper-Mercer of the 2015 Oregon shooting, who said that "My whole life has been one lonely enterprise. One loss after another. And here I am, 26, with no friends, no job, no girlfriend, a virgin. I long ago realized that society likes to deny people like me these things."
While those concerned about the danger of such an association are likely right to point out that autism doesn't inherently make one violent, it can't be denied that it is often a factor in leading young men like this down dark paths, as the social alienation and lack of...
...sexual/romantic success can leave them feeling hopeless and misanthropic.
What the solution to this is idk, but clearly society is failing autistic males and the consequences of leaving them in isolation to possibly fester in dark corners of the internet can be disastrous.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It seems feminists are increasingly adopting talking points from the manosphere and reframing them as 'empowering'.
This idea that 5% of men hoarded all the women (during the neolithic era - a detail often omitted) sounds absurd on its face because it is. Let's see why exactly🧵
The theory underlying this tends to be that as social/wealth inequality rose following the advent of agriculture, so too did reproductive inequality among men, with women opting to share a higher status man than settle for one of low status.
Issues with this theory:
The effect of social status on men's reproductive success is of similar magnitude in hunter gatherer, agriculturalist, and pastoralist societies: researchgate.net/publication/30…
'Chad' has been officially debunked.
Here's why the 'growing Chadopolization' of the sexual marketplace is a myth:
🧵
There is a pervasive belief online that a minority of aesthetically gifted men—colloquially referred to as 'Chads'—are hoarding a growing share of the sexual pie, leaving the majority of men out in the cold and fighting over scraps: the so-called '80/20 rule'.
Before, this destructive sexual dynamic was suppressed by the enforcement of monogamy. Following the sexual revolution however, it has naturally re-emerged, and is having disastrous effects on society. This narrative has begun to be promoted by academics.
Here we go again. This 'app-driven chadopoly' theory is totally evidence-free. It's all based on overly simplistic extrapolations from imbalanced swipe rates and many men having low match rates. This says next to nothing about what actual behaviour these apps are facilitating 🧵
Swipe rates in a vacuum provide negligible insight. For one thing--at least partially owing to the skewed gender ratio--many men adopt a spray and pray approach to swiping, filtering out any undesired matches after the fact (which swiping data doesn't capture).
When we look at the median match rates, we see a ratio of about 1:2.75 M:F, which happens to mirror the gender ratio. This means that after adjusting for the gender imbalance, the average woman is actually matching at the same rate as the average man.
In a study by Scott & Ward (2018), observers rated the mental health, attractiveness, physical health, and masculinity of composite faces made from men who scored the highest or lowest in AQ (Autism), IDS (Depression), and SPQ (Schizotypy).
🧵
Easy to mistake the 'low' and 'high' as referring to scores on the traits listed on the right, but low 'actual mental health' implies they score higher on the traits and vice versa.
What we see is that despite the fact that the composite images with low actual mental health were accurately perceived as such, only men high in schizotypal traits were rated significantly lower in attractiveness.
Data from Pew Research's American Trends Panel Wave 103, conducted in Feb 2022.
The article based on the survey done later that year didn't break this down by age.
38% of single men and 31% of single women between the ages of 18-29 reported not seeking relationships.
So the rates of 50% and 65% of men and women not seeking relationships was being highly skewed by older people, especially for women.
Taking the single rates of this survey into account, 22% of 18-29 men and 10% of 18-29 women were both single and not seeking relationships.
So according to this, there may be more MGTOWs than WGTOWs after all.
The rates were equal in the APS survey however, with about 20% of both 18-29 men and women being single + not looking.
Is obsessing over sex a cope?
There are some people who seem to think that men's purpose in life should be to score the highest 'body count' and that this would bring them great fulfillment. What we find however from The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health..
Is that lifetime vaginal sex partners, vaginal sex partners in the past year, and even past year vaginal sex acts (so not necessarily promiscuity related) don't seem to have a positive association with mental health in either women or men.
If you weren't satisfied with your life before hypothetically becoming a 'slayer', you probably won't suddenly be filled with zest for life after either.
At least after the fleeting moments of pleasure have faded.