Hinduism is oldest religion of Punjab. But it has become a minority religion.
Just like Mughals, Khalistanis systematically destroyed several 100s of Hindu temples to terrify Hindus & eradicate Hinduism .
As situation becomes worse now, a thread about Punjabi Hindu temples
🧵
Durgiana Mandir is one of the oldest temples of Amritsar.
According to the regional Hindu tradition, this temple was built on the spot where Lava and Kusha bound Hanuman. It is also mentioned in Puranas
The temple annually attracts millions of Hindus from all over the country.
Amritsar has very ancient Hindu history.
According to the regional Hindu tradition recorded in the "Survey of Amritsar", Amritsar got its name from Amrit immersed by Lava and Kusha in a pond.
Hindu Yaudheya coins dating back to 2000 years have been discovered around Amritsar.
Durgiana Mandir was rebuilt in 1921.
It housed the original Murtis of Vishnu & Durga which were inside Parikrama of Harmandir Sahib until they were unceremoniously thrown out in 1905.
Radicals frequently attacked this temple to break those Murtis and eliminate this history.
In 1982, in what was a completely unprovoked attack, activists of a group named Dal Khalsa threw a severed cow head inside Durgiana temple.
Dal Khalsa describes itself as a "Human Rights organization which strives to establish independent Sikh state".
Mahakali temple of Patiala is a very famous temple.
It was built by Maharaja Bhupinder Singh of Patiala.
The Murti of Kali was brought from Bengal and the Goddess is revered as the Kuldevi of Patiala. Hindus make annual pilgrimages to this temple on Dashara.
In 1982, Khalistani radicals hung tail of a cow inside the Mahakali temple of Patiala.
Devotees were shocked to see the tail of a cow hung inside the Garba Griha of the temple.
The priest of the temple was asked to leave Punjab in 48 hours and his family received rαpe threats
Dal Khalsa, the organization which claims that it strives to establish an independent Sikh state, not only took responsibility for these attacks but also declared their intention of repeating them.
This organization was temporarily banned in 1982 but the ban was lifted.
Apart from desecrating Hindu temples, the Dal Khalsa also has a history of hijacking airplanes .
In 2020 Akal Takht, the highest temporal seat of Sikhism, decided to honor the founder of Dal Khalsa
Ram Tirath is one of the oldest temples of Amritsar.
According to the Hindu tradition, Ram Tirath was the place where Goddess Sita gave birth to Lava and Kusha
On December 3 1983, Khalistani activists sprinkled petrol on the Murtis of Krishna, Subhadra and Balrama inside the Garba Girha of Ram Tirath temple.
They set the Murtis of Hindu Gods on fire.
They urinated all over the walls of the temples and spat on the doors.
It is to be noted that all these incidents happened BEFORE the Operation Blue Star carried out by Congress Government in 1984.
The attacks of Hindu temples were not confined to just Punjab.
The radicals crossed over Punjab into Haryana and bombed several Hindu temples.
Panchmukhi Hanuman Mandir is a very famous temple of Haryana.
Coins of ancient Yaudheyas dating back to 100 BC have been found at this ancient temple.
On November 21 1983, two bombs were thrown on this temple. A damaged section was later rebuilt by funds collected from devotees
Even the Jain temples were not spared.
On May 5, 1984 Jain temple in Amritsar was looted and desecrated.
Because the Jains are a very affluent community who decorated their temples with a lot of wealth, Jain temples were seen by Khalistani radicals as a great source for loot.
On February 28 of the same year, another Jain temple was desecrated and looted.
While Jain temples were a great source for loot,Hindu processions typically had a large congregation.
They bombed Hindu fairs like Shivaratri & Ramnavami where Hindus gathered in large numbers to ensure maximum Hindu kiIIings.
Shivala temple of Amritsar was bombed on Shivaratri
During the Shivala temple bombing on February 29 1984, 3 people were kiIIed and 32 injured.
The damaged section of the temple could not be rebuilt until 2005
Brahmins were a favorite target of Khalistani activists. Bhindranwale's rhetoric frequently centred on anti Brahmanism.
On 25th June 1983, a Pujari of a temple in Sultanpur was kiIIed with a sharp knife
While attacks on Hindu places of worship have abated in Punjab after the anti militancy drives of police and army, we are now beginning to see a sort of revival.
Recently in 2021, a Hindu priest was warned and shot. He passed away. Radicals desecrated Ram Lila
May 31 1988:
Radicals belonging to a religion b0mbed Shivala Hindu temple and a market, kiIIing 28 and injuring 100.
This was the second attack on the same temple in 4 years
This is exactly the kind of apologia offered by Pakistan supporters. That thousands of Hindu temples are still standing in Pakistan!
Thousands of temples are still standing in Punjab not because of Khalistani generosity. It is because of the resilience and devotion of the Hindu
The resilient & devoted Hindu rebuilds and reconstructs anything that has been desecrated or destroyed at the first opportunity he gets.
In this manner, thousands of Hindu temples existed even in Mughal India.The credit does not go to Khalistanis. Besides, what I have shared (+)
What I have shared thus far is only the tip of the iceberg. There are many more instances of such temple desecrations.
In a Hindu temple where murti is consecrated as embodiment of divine , any desecration of sacred space is tantamount to destruction.
Besides, many cases of shrines of the Hindus especially in villages destroyed. These were not significantly large & their desecrations/destructions were not reported out of fear of reprisal.
If we go by this logic, Ghazni never destroyed temples because Somanth exists today
Of course, Khalistanis destroyed only a dozen temples just as Audrey claims Aurangzeb destroys only a dozen temples!
Khalistani scale of destruction can never match Mughals because Mughals conquered entire India. Khalistanis have influence in a very small region and even there
Even in this small region, they never got any official power. That they still managed to desecrate/destroy so many temples right under the nose of a modern Government is staggering.
Still, in their barbarism, form, method & intention, Khalistanis matched Mughals inch by inch
While such threads can be very harsh, they do good to expose the sham of the people who swear by neutrality and brotherhood but are most interested in hiding the real truth with falsehood.
These are not "old wounds". Almost every fortnight, we hear of Hindu temple desecration from Australia, Canada or US.
Recently, a Hindu priest was kiIIed. Khalistanis were chargesheeted. Many Hindus from Punjab say they live in fear hindustantimes.com/cities/chandig…
2021: Temple desecration from Sangrur, Punjab. Posters of Hindu Gods and Goddesses were burnt!
Murtis of Shiva and Hanuman were destroyed, the Trishul was broken
But today, an abominable lowlife called Ruchika Sharma abused Shivaji Maharaj. She falsely dubbed him as a 'looter' on Live TV. She made a factually inaccurate and slanderous statement.
The man who gave Hindus freedom, respect and dignity gets insulted. Thankless Hindu nation doesn't even bother.
Fact-check thread🧵:
This cunning anchor @anjanaomkashyap platforms such filth. Invites her and lets her spew venom. Doesn't interrupt or fact-check her lies. Just adds a disclaimer at the end.
Shame on you @anjanaomkashyap and others who platform such filth for TRP.
In tweets below, I will fact-check this inaccurate claim.
This alleged historian Ruchika @tishasaroyan says:
" Shivaji's own Bakhars say he looted Hindu temple town of Srirangapatna and surrounding areas".
Hey @tishasaroyan, here is an open challenge to you and your ilk:
Show us which Bakhar says Shivaji looted Srirangapatna.
There is none. It is not mentioned in any Bakhar. Have some shame you liar.
This Portuguese "Saint" used to say that Indians were black and ugly "monsters whose sight is unbearable".
This colonialist destroyed many Hindu temples with his own hands. He wrote many letters to the Portuguese king advocating for inquisition in Goa. He was thus directly responsible for Goan inquisition which kiIIed thousands of Hindus and some Jews.
According to Francis Xavier, Indian women were 'black and ugly monsters whose sight is unbearable'.
According to him, 'black and ugly Indian women' were unfit to be even Portuguese Concubines.
It is amazing that in 21st century, most visitors to his grave are Indian and 'Hindu' women.
[ Source: Celebrated Jesuits by William Harris Rule]
Portuguese forcibly converted many Hindu Dalit fishermen. Many of these converts used to worship Hindu Gods secretly.
When Francis Xavier came to know about this, he burnt the huts of these Dalit converts. This was a punishment for secretly worshiping Hindu deities.
This is false. She is deliberately using a CORRUPTED verse to defame Shri Rāma and Sita.
What the corrupted verse reads:
उषित्वा द्वा दश समाः इक्ष्वाकूणाम् निवेशने |
भुंजाना मानुषान् भोगान् सर्व काम समृद्धिनी ||
("I resided at my in laws for 12 years")
However, this corrupted verse (probably a medieval copyist's mistake) is present only in some southern manuscripts.
But in Maithili, Bengali, and Devaganagari as well as calcutta manuscripts of Valmiki Ramayana [N2 – V1 – B – D6-7], the verse reads as:
संवत्सरं चाध्युषिता इक्ष्वाकूणाम् निवेशने |
भुंजाना मानुषान् भोगान् सर्व काम समृद्धिनी ||
("I resided at my in laws for 1 year")
Therefore, Devi Sita was 18-1=17 years old at the time of her wedding and NOT 6 years old as wrongly claimed below:
Here is what the authors and editors of Critical Edition of Valmiki Ramayana had to say:
After noticing the discrepancy between manuscripts, they come to the conclusion that staying at "one year" is not only attested to by many manuscripts(2 Nepali, 1 Maithili, 1 Bengali, Devanagari, Gorresio, Calcutta)
but that it also suits the context.
In Valmiki Ramayana (2.17.26 CE), Kausalya laments that Shri Rāma was just 17 years old at the time of exile [दश सप्त च वर्षाणि तव जातस्य राघव].
Let us assume for the sake of argument that exile happened 12 years after wedding.
This makes Shri Rāma just 5 years old at the time of wedding.
He underwent Upanayana (to be conducted at 11 years for Kṣatriyas according to Dharmaśāstras). He then completed his education. He then protected Vishvamitra's sacrifice by his physical prowess. Then broke Shiva's bow. And then married Sita.
All a boy of 5 years? The sheer absurdity of this entire argument!
In my thread, I showed that Sambhal disputed structure was originally a temple, which was not used as a Mosque until 19th century.
Denying all evidence, this apologist produces a painting of the disputed structure from 1789. He alleges the artist of this sketch depicted 'Jama Masjid of Sambhal'.
Is it true? Let us examine the evidence to see what the artist of the sketch himself had to say
Thread 🧵
The artist of this sketch was William Daniell. He and his uncle Thomas Daniell had toured India. Apart from the paintings, they also left a description of this structure.
Does the artist say the above structure is a Jama Mosque? The answer is an emphatic NO.
The artist says that in 1789, local Muslims called the structure "the grave of Babur".
To begin with. In Muslim religion, a grave is NOT a mosque. A grave is not a place fit for any sort of worship.
According to authentic Hadiths, Prophet Muhammad cursed the Jews and Christians for building places of worship at graves. Prophet clearly instructed Muslims not to construct Mosques at the graves and not to use graves of righteous men as places of worship.
Of course, a few ignorant and illiterate Muslims who are not well informed about their own religion do offer prayers at graves but that doesn't change the fact that a grave is not and cannot be a Mosque.
Muslims claim Sambhal is a historical "Mosque" built by Babur in 16th century.
This is FALSE. Babur did NOT build this mosque . It did not even exist until 19th century,
It was a Hindu temple until recently, before it was stolen by Muslims. Thread
Sambhal has been in the news:
Muslims & Liberals have argued that Sambhal is a historical Mosque built by Babur. That it should thus be protected under the places of worship act 1991.
This is TOTALLY false. Sambhal Mosque was NOT built by Babur. It is a recent usurpation.
Sambhal holds great religious significance for Hindus. As great as Ayodhya & Mathura.
In the Mahabharata (3.189), it is mentioned that God Vishnu will take birth in Sambhala as Kalki. Kalki is the future avatara of Vishnu.
Skanda Purana mentions a Vishnu temple in Sambhala.
The Pushyamitra who allegedly destroyed Buddhist temples was NOT a Hindu king.
According to same story, he was a Buddhist. He was NOT Pushyamitra Sunga. Rather, he was Pushyamitra Maurya. A great grandson of Buddhist emperor Ashoka!