Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Mar 1, 2023 β€’ 14 tweets β€’ 7 min read β€’ Read on X
New cheese πŸ§€πŸ§€πŸ§€

For those enquiring about whether hospital episode statistics confirm an increase in miscarriages... the data is early.
NHS data only goes up to March 2022.

It's massively confounded but read on.

Here is "bleeding in early pregnancy" (O20)
7-sigma increase
NHS episode statistics 2017-2022:
"Ectopic pregnancy" ICD code O00.
7 sigma increase.
NHS episode statistic 2017-2022:
"Maternal care for fetal problems"
ICD code O36.
4.7 sigma increase

There are others, e.g. diabetes (7.1 sigma increase)
But there are two codes which behave very oddly, that based on the other codes you would expect a rise but are either the same or lower number of episodes.

There is an explanation so hold on...
Here is "spontaneous abortion" aka miscarriage.
The miscarriages are higher than the previous year (when there were more pregnancies) but lower than the previous years.

What's going on?

Why did miscarriages fall so dramatically in 2020?
The clue lies in O04 - complications of induced abortion. These *halved* suddenly in 2020. Why?

In 2020, the same NHS who told you to stay at home if you had pneumonia also told you to keep out of the hospital for your abortion.
Where abortion care moved to the community it did not generate a hospital episode, so the number of hospital episodes went down.

The same with miscarriages.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33893642/
Good luck getting the information on miscarriage numbers outside of hospital since 2020. Conveniently the ONS "do not hold this information"
ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transp…
So all we can say is that under the likely same circumstances, hospital managed miscarriages are 5% up on the previous year, and we do not know how many were managed in the community.

We can try and adjust for the drop in 2020 which would look a bit like this... Years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 data has been adjusted upwards
What we can say though is that many of the complications of #pregnancy that must be managed in hospital, such as ectopic pregnancy, have increases that are unprecedented (7-sigma).

Despite a drop in birth numbers.

That's a massive safety signal.
And remember that most of the COVID vaccinations given in pregnancy were in the 2nd-3rd trimester, where they don't influence miscarriage rates.

A *doubling* of the miscarriage rate from 10% to 20% in 10% of pregnancies would give a graph that looked something like...

Yep.
And even without adjusting for community cases, if 5% of women received a COVID vaccine in the first trimester and the miscarriage rate doubled from 5% to 10% you would get a 5% rise from the previous year's numbers.

Exactly the figure seen (see ALT text for calculation) NHS total pregnancies are around 600,000 per year registered
Source for the above all taken from NHS digital hospital admitted care activity:

@ClareCraigPath @joshg99 @MartinNeil9 @RealJoelSmalley @EthicalSkeptic @boriquagato
digital.nhs.uk/data-and-infor…

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Jan 25
@JaninePaynter @PetousisH Following 4 years of enforced medical interventions does the public trust or distrust public health?
@JaninePaynter @PetousisH Always worth recording after the early polling and before the pharma companies send in their accounts.

It's like Georgia. Someone flood the polling station quick! Image
@JaninePaynter @PetousisH And here we have it.
The poll started off in one direction, and as soon as the pharma brigade got hold of it, it went the opposite way.

The problem is that they now have 19 hours to keep the bots going.

@elonmusk please make poll voting a 2-step interaction. TY.
Image
Image
Read 9 tweets
Oct 28, 2023
BOOM πŸ’₯πŸ’₯
It's a gene therapy.
It was a gene therapy yesterday.
It will still be a gene therapy tomorrow.
With a plasmid, it's two gene therapies.

The OGTR confirms:
"Under the gene technology act an [OGTR] approval would have been required"

@SenatorRennick @double_christ
@SenatorRennick @Double_Christ This was a lie from Dr Raj Bhula.
It's transfection.
It's in the Pfizer documents that the TGA have.
Everybody knows it's transfection.
If Dr Bhula doesn't know, she should resign immediately.
The OGTR failed.
From the document that @SenatorRennick is referring to.

They never knew what they were doing. They just needed to make you take it.
Who told them to do that?
And why was it necessary for you to have 3 transfections in order to earn a living?

tga.gov.au/sites/default/…
Image
Read 9 tweets
Oct 25, 2023
Hi @peterdaszak now that I have your attention why did Alice Latinne hide those viral sequences from your 2019 Nature paper, and where did the GP-120 sequences come from?

Asking for 6.9m people who can't, because they died.

.
@chrismartenson
Image
Read 7 tweets
Oct 23, 2023
Well, it used to be rare.

This is the same rare lymphoma that Michel Goldman wrote about developing after a COVID mRNA "vaccine".

(see next tweet).
news.com.au/entertainment/…

Image
Michel Goldman's story in the Atlantic
archive.is/S3xXz
Original paper - which was Michel Goldman's own story, published in Frontiers.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Read 7 tweets
Oct 22, 2023
Were the claims made in this press conference by a high profile CNN doctor true?

Watch the conference clip and follow the thread below.
It is impossible to know what is happening in another part of the world unless you are there.

But the statements made by Gassan Abu-Sittah cannot be true as made.

If not true they could even qualify as an incitement to further violence. Image
The claims made by Dr Abu-Sittah are not accidental or misinterpreted.

He specifically claimed that 500 people were killed - days after the press conference when it was known that was not true.

Image
Read 15 tweets
Oct 18, 2023
The author of the BMJ article quoted by Viki as if it is gospel is a freelance journalist. He chose not to include that qualifier in this BMJ piece.

This tweet from Viki is propaganda because it suggests something that is not true, adding the @bmj_latest label for authenticity
@bmj_latest Here is the request for the data underlying the MBRRACE report.

Data from the @NPEU_UKOSS has previously been requested under FOI and denied.

This is not their data, it belongs to the British public who fund them.

@bmj_latest @NPEU_UKOSS The BMJ article itself is just an opinion piece from a freelance journalist, basically repeating the party line - that only unvaccinated pregnant women died of COVID.

This is a misrepresentation of the truth.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(