Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Mar 1, 2023 14 tweets 7 min read Read on X
New cheese 🧀🧀🧀

For those enquiring about whether hospital episode statistics confirm an increase in miscarriages... the data is early.
NHS data only goes up to March 2022.

It's massively confounded but read on.

Here is "bleeding in early pregnancy" (O20)
7-sigma increase
NHS episode statistics 2017-2022:
"Ectopic pregnancy" ICD code O00.
7 sigma increase.
NHS episode statistic 2017-2022:
"Maternal care for fetal problems"
ICD code O36.
4.7 sigma increase

There are others, e.g. diabetes (7.1 sigma increase)
But there are two codes which behave very oddly, that based on the other codes you would expect a rise but are either the same or lower number of episodes.

There is an explanation so hold on...
Here is "spontaneous abortion" aka miscarriage.
The miscarriages are higher than the previous year (when there were more pregnancies) but lower than the previous years.

What's going on?

Why did miscarriages fall so dramatically in 2020?
The clue lies in O04 - complications of induced abortion. These *halved* suddenly in 2020. Why?

In 2020, the same NHS who told you to stay at home if you had pneumonia also told you to keep out of the hospital for your abortion.
Where abortion care moved to the community it did not generate a hospital episode, so the number of hospital episodes went down.

The same with miscarriages.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33893642/
Good luck getting the information on miscarriage numbers outside of hospital since 2020. Conveniently the ONS "do not hold this information"
ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transp…
So all we can say is that under the likely same circumstances, hospital managed miscarriages are 5% up on the previous year, and we do not know how many were managed in the community.

We can try and adjust for the drop in 2020 which would look a bit like this... Years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 data has been adjusted upwards
What we can say though is that many of the complications of #pregnancy that must be managed in hospital, such as ectopic pregnancy, have increases that are unprecedented (7-sigma).

Despite a drop in birth numbers.

That's a massive safety signal.
And remember that most of the COVID vaccinations given in pregnancy were in the 2nd-3rd trimester, where they don't influence miscarriage rates.

A *doubling* of the miscarriage rate from 10% to 20% in 10% of pregnancies would give a graph that looked something like...

Yep.
And even without adjusting for community cases, if 5% of women received a COVID vaccine in the first trimester and the miscarriage rate doubled from 5% to 10% you would get a 5% rise from the previous year's numbers.

Exactly the figure seen (see ALT text for calculation) NHS total pregnancies are around 600,000 per year registered
Source for the above all taken from NHS digital hospital admitted care activity:

@ClareCraigPath @joshg99 @MartinNeil9 @RealJoelSmalley @EthicalSkeptic @boriquagato
digital.nhs.uk/data-and-infor…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Jul 10
I was taught for years that @DrAndyWakefield had committed fraud - it was not true.

His prior paper - written with @PeterDaszak - showed that measles virus was a contributor to Crohn's.

The Lancet paper showed that bowel disease was a feature of severe disability after vaccination.

Wakefield had to be destroyed to protect the vaccine industry or it would have collapsed in 1998.

That is how the pharma industry works, but they can't do it alone.

In the case of the Wakefield saga, they were aided by the @bmj_latest who commissioned Brian Deer to fabricate a fake story about "fraud" because they were being paid by GSK and Merck - the very vaccine makers who stood to be eviscerated by the truth about their product's safety.

All this is documented (thread below).

The children in the paper were permanently disabled by the MMR vaccine and never, ever, got recognition. They are on track to die without ever having their vaccine disability recognised.

This is the worst travesty of the medical industry ever committed - because it was done for money.

@MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @PGtzsche1 @AaronSiriSG @stkirsch @RWMaloneMD @Fynnderella1
Measles and Crohn's disease - Daszak and Wakefield.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9215145/
Measles vaccine is live measles virus.
arkmedic.info/p/would-you-li…
Read 8 tweets
Jun 18
This is a false statement by omission.

It should say that cervical cancer deaths fell to zero in young women irrespective of vaccination status.

That is multifactorial due to change in screening and under-age sexual activity in the UK.

No RCT has shown a reduction in cancer
Teenage pregnancies are a surrogate for underage sexual activity (which drives cervical cancer rates in the under 25s). In the UK they fell off a cliff in 2007 - the year the iphone came out and the HPV vaccine rollout started.

At the same time there was a large rise in cervical cancer incidence in the older age group who were given the HPV vaccine in the "catch up" program.

It is a fallacy to say that it only works in underage girls.

Read 6 tweets
May 12
Absolutely not @quay_dr.

The "Swiss patient" sequence you provided not only has 2% dissimilarity from any known hanta sequence but BLASTing into the patent database gets us here.

"No name" virus.
Really?

The people running the @DeptofWar need to start going to jail.

@JesslovesMJK @Kevin_McKernan @open_vaet @Fynnderella1 @AGHuff @RepThomasMassie @BlackTomThePyr8 @FeeRedfern @artisbrutal2021Image
Image
Oof.. Jay Hooper
USAMRIID.



@FeeRedfern @RWMaloneMD @JesslovesMJK @carl_jurassic @open_vaet
@FeeRedfern @RWMaloneMD @JesslovesMJK @carl_jurassic @open_vaet Oh what a pretzel we weave when we try to deceive...

x.com/i/grok/share/d…Image
Read 4 tweets
Feb 23
💥BOOM 💥
This post attracted hundreds of abusive pharma trolls, including an attempt to community note the post.

It was just a reply to another post and got over 1000 likes but 100s of trolls.

Why?

I am going to tell you in the next post. And it will shake your world.
You were lied to about the Merck measles vaccine develop in the 60s. When injected into babies it caused fevers, rashes, diarrhoea and febrile convulsions.

Why?

I'm going to show you.
@SecKennedy @RetsefL @MaryanneDemasi @DrJulieSladden @RWMaloneMD
Merck claimed that the "measles vaccine" was an "attenuated version of measles" giving the impression that it was a virus that was made safe.

That was a lie.

It was just measles, passaged in cells in a lab.

We injected our babies with actual measles.
How do I know?
Read 11 tweets
Feb 10
💥💥💥BOOM💥💥💥

Recently released Australian Road Deaths data confirm that the @epiphare study claiming that COVID vaccination reduced road deaths by 32% was, as suspected, a complete fake.

See next tweet for the analysis and sources.
Paper: jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman… x.com/sudokuvariante…https://www.bitre.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/road-trauma-australia-2024.pdf
Here are the actual road deaths data plotted from the Australian BITRE data repository using a trendline for 2000-2019 (excluding 2020 as it was a quiet year)

The pink area shows the inflection and increase in road deaths over the predicted number.

Note that road deaths have a downward trend despite an increase in population (due to safety measures and slowing of traffic).Image
So the question becomes...
"what is the probability that - if the @epiphare study was real (showing a 32% reduction in road deaths after vaccination) - the Australian road deaths (where nearly 100% of the adult population was vaccinated) would increase by 36%"?
Read 8 tweets
Jan 24
🚨🚨🚨
Do you know why you can't win a vaccine injury case in the US?

This one tweet from @DebbieN97142 opens the Pandora's box that is the Vaccine Injuries Compensation Scheme.

You never stood a chance.
Thread below.

@AaronSiriSG @MaryanneDemasi @RWMaloneMD
Debbie's tweet was about her case against @HHSGov when her son developed Type 1 Diabetes after a routine vaccine, when he had a negative glucose test prior.

So it was clearly vaccine linked, but her case was denied.

How did that happen?

From her post Image
Not only was the case denied (despite clear evidence of a new diagnosis immediately after vaccination) but the case was used by the "judge" to essentially ban ANY further cases that alleged a link between new diabetes and a routine vaccine.

Read it again. Image
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(