For those enquiring about whether hospital episode statistics confirm an increase in miscarriages... the data is early.
NHS data only goes up to March 2022.
It's massively confounded but read on.
Here is "bleeding in early pregnancy" (O20)
7-sigma increase
NHS episode statistic 2017-2022:
"Maternal care for fetal problems"
ICD code O36. 4.7 sigma increase
There are others, e.g. diabetes (7.1 sigma increase)
But there are two codes which behave very oddly, that based on the other codes you would expect a rise but are either the same or lower number of episodes.
There is an explanation so hold on...
Here is "spontaneous abortion" aka miscarriage.
The miscarriages are higher than the previous year (when there were more pregnancies) but lower than the previous years.
What's going on?
Why did miscarriages fall so dramatically in 2020?
The clue lies in O04 - complications of induced abortion. These *halved* suddenly in 2020. Why?
In 2020, the same NHS who told you to stay at home if you had pneumonia also told you to keep out of the hospital for your abortion.
Where abortion care moved to the community it did not generate a hospital episode, so the number of hospital episodes went down.
Good luck getting the information on miscarriage numbers outside of hospital since 2020. Conveniently the ONS "do not hold this information" ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transp…
So all we can say is that under the likely same circumstances, hospital managed miscarriages are 5% up on the previous year, and we do not know how many were managed in the community.
We can try and adjust for the drop in 2020 which would look a bit like this...
What we can say though is that many of the complications of #pregnancy that must be managed in hospital, such as ectopic pregnancy, have increases that are unprecedented (7-sigma).
Despite a drop in birth numbers.
That's a massive safety signal.
And remember that most of the COVID vaccinations given in pregnancy were in the 2nd-3rd trimester, where they don't influence miscarriage rates.
A *doubling* of the miscarriage rate from 10% to 20% in 10% of pregnancies would give a graph that looked something like...
Yep.
And even without adjusting for community cases, if 5% of women received a COVID vaccine in the first trimester and the miscarriage rate doubled from 5% to 10% you would get a 5% rise from the previous year's numbers.
Exactly the figure seen (see ALT text for calculation)
Source for the above all taken from NHS digital hospital admitted care activity:
🧵If you have decided after 48 hours that "The Israelis did it" you have not only fallen for the deep state's playbook again... but you probably think that Ashley Babbitt was killed by a movie gunshot to the shoulder.
Stop falling for the narratives.
[credit: @wooz_news ]
For the record the official cause of death was listed as "gunshot wound to the left anterior shoulder". This is not possible as the cause of death of the woman in the video as portrayed.
Instantaneous death as portrayed in the Babbitt video cannot happen with a gunshot to the shoulder as it does not involve the spinal cord or brain.
There are also no major vessels to bleed out (which would take a while) other than the subclavian. If that bled out enough to cause mortality there would be a bloodbath.
The Wooz news video confirms the lack of bleeding.
Y'all understand what antimicrobial stewardship is don't you?
And why these zealots were responsible for potentially millions of COVID deaths because they didn't want to treat post viral pneumonia with antibiotics.
To be clear it was the "antimicrobial stewardship" people that were responsible for telling you that if your pneumonia happened after a positive COVID test youcan't have antibiotics.
@SenRonJohnson @RWMaloneMD The tweet now not visible (because he just deleted his account) was Jake Scott telling you how bad azithromycin is (it isn't, when you have pneumonia)
Because @realDonaldTrump has shown a chink in his "best vaccine ever" narrative the deep state is in panic mode so are rolling out the limited hangouts.
See next tweet for explanation.
This "reveal" from David Martin is not what it seems
David Martin sounds knowledgeable - and he is - but his sensationalism is intentional because it will be dismissed by the people who need to be persuaded. He will occupy your time with patent drivel and nothing new will emerge.
It's intentional because that's his role
Just like Stew Peters, Sasha Latypova, Jane Ruby, Ana Mihalcea, Mike Yeadon, Joe Sansone and a few others with the "graphene in the jabs" "viruses don't exist" "jabs are bioweapons" rhetoric.
It's intended to sound crazy.
It's a smart move because there is underlying truth
The Pharma lobby group BIO admitting to using "conservative" lobby groups to attempt to oust @SecKennedy to keep the vaccine industry alive.
Important highlights:
⭐️Targeting @DrMakaryFDA to "rebuild FDA capacity"
⭐️Target @AEI via Scott Gottlieb and @DLA_Piper via Richard Burr
⭐️Help build trust in vaccines (what happened to the trust?)
⭐️Investors are leaving vaccine investment
⭐️Vaccines are the #1 priority at BIO
⭐️National security commission Biotech report a way in to sell product
⭐️$2m to be spent on "vaccine programs"
⭐️"More productive to target Makary and Trump Insiders vs RFK Jr"
Remember that BIO are the organisation that funded and organised the @shotsheard harassment group that target doctors for deregistration (e.g. @mdbreathe and @drcole12) if they publish genuine safety concerns about pharma products.
Links below.
Social media targeting, harassment and blackmail is absolutely securities fraud. law.justia.com/codes/us/2002/… and others
@SECGov @FBIDirectorKash do your job.
Remember that the BIO lobby group Shots Heard - which targeted doctors and scientists to blackmail them into silence over COVID vaccines - included people like Viki Male, Kevin Ault (ACIP), David Gorski and Dorit Reiss.