Thanks to @RealCheckMarker for warning most consistently, as the precautionary principle suggests.
3. Critically, this polemical lecture. I'm not sure I'd recommend following along, as I think it fails to follow the precautionary principle; but could also be rigorous scientific argument - you be the judge. Anecdote from the start of the eyeborne plague: bmjophth.bmj.com/content/7/1/e0…
4. This kind CM312 message meets the eye too. (I'm half joking in this thread for the eye-catching puns, but also note that XBB.1.5 has high hACE2 affinity and may efficiently infect through ocular surface epithelia for all I know.)
5. Behold and see: I'm still mostly just trying to understand what the plan for the coming years is. If we're optimizing SARS for another few years, You Bet this will be a good investment.
Aviation drives the COVID-19 pandemic and climate breakdown.
Quarantine of intercontinental travelers at airports will (1) stop the pandemic - no need for lockdowns - and (2) buy time to rebuild supply chains for climate (IHR 2005).
2. This is how pandemics are ended in the modern age. It is harder now than in SARS 2003, given higher international mobility and a more rapidly evolving pathogen.
3. Scholars, where are you in THE public health question of our times? SARS is a neurocognitive problem. Damage is cumulative and progressive; ignoring is not an option.
It's been eeriely quiet in the intellectual department!?
Viral thread. Note that the UCSF studies found no evidence of Long COVID as an autoimmune disease.
Cannot be ruled out yet, but "what appears to be the most rigorous assessment of autoimmunity yet in long COVID didn’t find evidence of it." - Of interest also to ME/CFS patients.
This means freedom for SARS-CoV-2 to transmit and mutate unmitigated as the legal foundations for genetic surveillance, and test & trace, are removed in many countries.
Today mask mandates ended in Germany. We saw the WORST increase in excess mortality of all major economies, with the possible exception of China, so that’s obvs an epic, deadly policy error. But there’s more
You don't get to end mask mandates, the only measure that helps after SARS variant XBB.1.5 mutated around all vaccines and treatments in record time, and get to claim you "ended" "the" "pandemic."
1. As a political scientist, my main question is why it took three years for most scientists to face reality. Biological warfare is a distinct possibility in the future, accidents happen even in benign or dual use research, and regulation and oversight are historically poor. 😂🤡
2. Read more, talk less, is generally good advice for people who don’t understand the precautionary principle or can’t be bothered to think questions to the end.
3. Understand that the origin question doesn’t even matter *except for law enforcements and prevention of future pandemics.*
SARS-CoV-2 eradication/elimination takes the same steps regardless of origin as SARS-CoV eradication in 2003. We know it will work sooner or later. 😈😴🤷♂️
Anyone is invited to do more professional modeling of long-term excess mortality trends, given the molecular and mechanistic analyses we share (of SARS pathogenesis) and politics (show your assumptions).
This is at best high school algebra. If I can do this, so can anyone else!
Before anyone thinks the above 'extreme' scenario is extreme, reread the available literature. If 1 out of 3 infected experience PASC or a form of Long COVID and many of them develop acquired lymphocytopenia, then the above is an underestimate.