sodomy laws in America date back to the 17th century, and were derived from christian law which deemed non-procreative sex (oral and anal) regardless of gender or sexuality, as a “crime against god/nature”
the laws were mostly applied as secondary charges for other sex crimes
many states revised their sodomy laws in the 1970s to target gay people in response to the burgeoning gay liberation movement of the 1960s (e.g., Stonewall)
in conjunction with other anti-gay laws, the goal of revised sodomy laws was to ban gay people from public life
so now that we’ve established the basic history and purpose of sodomy laws in the United States, we can get to the big question
“how did governments enforce gay sex being illegal?”
the short answer is they left it up to ordinary citizens
the long answer? let’s dive in
in addition to gay sex bring a criminal act in many states, public displays of homosexuality were also illegal
for instance, in 1940s New York, it was a crime to employ cabaret performers that were gay or “pretended to be,” meaning queer-themed entertainment was a crime
in addition to 1940s bans on gay cabaret (sound familiar? modern anti-drag bills are recycled bigotry), any public display of homosexuality (kissing, hand holding, dates etc.) was considered public degeneracy, and was punishable with jail, forced castration, conversion therapy
because of the steep consequences for being outed as gay, gay people of the time took to hiding, meeting in secret be it for dates or social gatherings (e.g., gay bars, balls, drag shows)
so where does gay sex factor into the hiding? gay people of the era often avoided having sex at home because that meant risking being seen with your sex partner by neighbors
many gay people would have sex in public bathrooms, bars, or parks late at night, to avoid attention
this behavior eventually came to be known in the community as cruising, a protective slang term that allowed the intended audience (mostly gay men and trans women) to understand intent without raising the attention of straight people
while avoiding having gay sex at home was meant to be a protective action, public sex came with great risk too
many gay men and trans women were caught by late night strollers, police on patrol, or seen by passers by, and that led to prosecution for sodomy
once police became aware of cruising culture, they relied on informants and citizen reports to target gay people
the targeting came in the form of raids on known gay bars (e.g., Stonewall), undercover cops pretending to be gay to entrap gay men, and even raids on homes
“well why would they raid homes? how did they know someone was gay?”
are you a gay man who is constantly seen with other men, but never with women?
you’re getting reported by your neighbors for suspicion
you get seen leaving a known gay bar? cops could follow you home
understand that mere suspicion of being gay was enough to get you harassed and/or prosecuted then
Jim Gaylord, a history teacher from Tacoma, Washington was fired in 1972 because a student told the vice principal that Gaylord was gay
the Supreme Court ruled in 1977 that Jim Gaylord’s firing was constitutionally permitted because “homosexuality was considered an ‘immorality’ that was a ‘sufficient cause for discharge’”
that was the long ago in the 1970s”
prior to the 2003 SCOTUS ruling of Lawerence v Texas, 16 states still had sodomy laws on the books (and still do) which were being enforced well into the 1990s such as the 1982 case of Michael Hardwick, and 1993 case of Randall Menges
July of 1982, Michael Hardwick, an employee at an Atlanta gay bar, was cited for public drinking when a cop saw Hardwick toss a beer bottle in the bar’s trash can
Hardwick paid the fine, but was issued a summons, which the citing officer took to Hardwick’s home 3 weeks later
when the officer arrived at Hardwick’s home, the front door was open, so the officer entered unannounced, and caught Hardwick having oral sex with another man
the officer cited both men for sodomy, which was a felony in Georgia punishable by up to 20 years in prison
the DA eventually declined to prosecute on the grounds that the summons was invalid, but Hardwick sued, which led to a SCOTUS case, Bowers v Hardwick
the court ruled 5-4 in favor of Georgia’s sodomy law, upholding it as constitutional
Randall Menges wasn’t as lucky as Hardwick
on a Idaho ranch in 1993, a then teenage Randall Menges was caught having consensual sex with two other teen boys, and was prosecuted for violating Idaho’s “crimes against nature” sodomy law
Mendes was sentenced to 15 years in prison, and enrolled on the sex offender registry
Randall Menges served 7 of his 15 year prison sentence
Menges remained on the sex offender registry until 2021, when a Montana federal court ruled he no longer had to be on the registry because the Lawerence v Texas ruling overturned his “crime” of having gay sex
Lawerence v Texas is well known as the 2003 SCOTUS ruling that legalized gay sex at the federal level
what’s not often discussed outside of history discourse is how that case made it all the way to the Supreme Court in the first place
on September 17th of 1998, John Geddes Lawrence Jr, a gay man, was hosting a small get together with two friends, also gay: Tyron Garner and Robert Eubanks
Eubanks and Lawerence were friends going on 20 years, while Garner and Eubanks were on-again off-again partners since 1990
John Lawerence, knowing the rocky nature of Tyron and Robert’s relationship, flirted with Tyron throughout the night, which angered Robert
in an act of jealousy (and racism), Robert called the police and told them a “crazed Black man with a gun” was at Lawerence’s apartment
the first first officer on-scene claimed he saw Lawerence and Garner having anal sex. a second officer claimed he saw them having oral sex
two other officers reported seeing nothing
Lawrence and Garner were still charged with violating Texas’ “Homosexual Conduct” law
the officers charged John Lawerence and Tyron Garner with “deviant sex,” specifically “anal sex with another man”
Lawrence and Garner both plead not guilty during arraignment, but at their November hearing, at the uriging of @LambdaLegal, both plead no contest
a Justice of the Peace found Lawrence and Garner guilty, fining them $125 each
Lawrence and Garner’s defense pursued an appeal: four times
the first court dismissed, the second ruled the law unconstitutional
the third reversed the second ruling, and the fourth declined review
finally, Lawerence and Garner’s case was brought before SCOTUS in July of 2002, with a ruling in June of 2003
SCOTUS overturned Bowers v Hardwick, stating that consensual gay sex was a privacy issue, and therefore constitutionally protected
so there you have it
a brief history of gay sex being illegal in the United States, and how it was enforced over the decades
given the state of gay and trans rights in 2023, i understand why younger queers think things are as bad as ever for the LGBT+ community
but please know that when Millennial and Gen X queers remark on things being better than they used to be, that it isn’t an embellishment
it isn’t the trope of old people talking down to younger people about “how easy you kids have it!”
in 2023, gay and trans rights are still under attack from bigoted politicians and their supporters
homophobia and transphobia are still a daily threat to gay and trans people
despite that, things are better now than they were in the days when gay sex was punishable with prison
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
i feel like an omitted consideration common to many of the responses i got to this thread is the fact that Millennials, Gen X, and other older cohorts in the LGBT+ community dealt with compulsory heterosexuality at a systemic scale
like for sure, there’s a lot of shitty anti-trans and anti-gay legislation being pushed, but it does not reflect the zeitgeist
as of 2021, polling data from PBS and NPR revealed that 66% of Americans are opposed to anti-trans legislation, and that includes republican voters
but in the 80s, 90s, and 2000s, homophobia and transphobia were so widely accepted that even a supposedly liberal state like California voted against gay marriage: twice
52% of Californian voters supported a ban on gay marriage in 2008
transphobic cis people claim to want scientific justification for trans people being trans, but when faced with scientific evidence, they reject it
transphobes have no interest in science that affirms being trans, only in science that supports their transphobic bigotry
like, Ray Blanchard’s “transexualism typology” frames trans women’s transness as linked to being effeminate homosexual men or hyper heterosexual men who are aroused by being women
Blanchard’s bigoted theory has been discredited numerous times, yet transphobes still invoke it
for transphobes, science isn’t about objectivity, but about the appeal to authority and confirmation bias
transphobes form conclusions first, then look for evidence that supports their conclusion rather than using evidence to shape their conclusions
i’ve had quite a few people coming into my thread about LGBT+ history, and the recency and fragility of queer rights in America, to tell me “America isn’t the whole world!”
yeah, you’re right! that’s why i’m an American, talking to other Americans, about issues in America
y’all NEED to get over this assumption that when a person tweets about a subject, that they are supposed to consider every possible variation and exception for that subject
i’m allowed to talk about American social and political issues without speaking about every other country
like, i get that homophobia and transphobia are a global crisis. i get that gay liberation is further along in some countries than in the United States, and much further behind in other countries
but none of that negates what i’ve said about the political climate in the U.S.
when gay marriage was legalized in 2015, the oldest of Gen Z were turning 18 years old, the legal age for marriage in most of the country
meaning Gen Z has never been marriage eligible during a time when gay marriage was a crime
like, for sure, there are members of Gen Z who understand their queer history in an academic sense, but y’all didn’t live it, or were so young that little of it affected you directly if at all, unless you had gay parents, which is statistically a negligible percent of you