CBI: We also need to examine some more people.
Judge: Kitna time interrogate kiya?
CBI: Almost daily. He had moved SC also, a lot of time was wasted in that. We need three more days.
CBI: We are trying to utilising the custody granted
Judge: How many hours you have questioned him?
Krishnan: Please look at the remand application. What is the difference between day 1 and today? At the end of the day, non cooperation cannot be a ground for remand.
They cannot say we will wait till he confesses. They should have completed the investigation. Their failure to complete investigation can't be a ground for remand: Krishnan.
Krishnan: Raids have been conducted at my residence and Delhi Police. So many months i was outside, suddenly they come and say we will trace all these documents. #ManishSisodia#RouseAvenueCourt#DelhiLiquorScam
Judge: You have already challenged the grounds for remand.
Mathur: There is some miscommunication. SC plea was for quashing of FIR.
Judge: You must have talked about the arrest and remand also.
Krishnan: We went to SC, and SC said you approach HC. It can't be put against me. #ManishSisodia#RouseAvenueCourt#DelhiLiquorScam
Judge: Remand order you can challenge before HC. If you think this was not warranted, you could have gone to HC.
Krishnan: That is not my argument. I am saying the remand should not be extended. #ManishSisodia#RouseAvenueCourt#DelhiLiquorScam
Mathur: In this case, while considering all these things, my wife's medical condition has been brushed aside. She is basically a vegetable and her body is degenerating.
Mathur: Harping on one line that he is not disclosing true facts. This was their reason for arrest and remand. What stops them from coming three days later and then ask for further custody. There has to be some estoppel on this.
Mathur: We have also filed bail application.
CBI: We will need 15 days to reply to that. Holi festival is there.
Mathur: They should release us for festival as well. I will be back on March 9.
Delhi High Court criticises the sexually explicit language used in TVF web series 'College Romance'.
The court says that the language used in the show has a "definite effect of depraving and corrupting the minds of young people". #DelhiHighCourt#TVF#CollegeRomance
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma says that for transmitting such content, TVF, the show's director Simarpreet Singh and actor Apoorva Arora are liable to face action under Section 67 and 67A of Information Technology Act. #DelhiHighCourt#TVF#CollegeRomance
The court has upheld the order of the ACMM is upheld who had ordered an FIR to be registered against the three under Sections 67 and 67A of IT Act.
The Karnataka High Court is hearing Twitter's petition challenging blocking orders issued by the Union Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology on the ground that account-level blocking violates users' rights.
While extending Sisodia's remand, the Court had asked the CBI to complete all confrontation exercises and Sisodia's examination and interrogation in the two days custody granted.
The Delhi High Court has set aside an order of the trial court directing registration of FIR against BJP leader Shahnawaz Hussain and his brother Shahbaz Hussain in the alleged rape case. #DelhiHighCourt@ShahnawazBJP#BJP
The trial court had ordered the Delhi Police to register FIR against Hussain and his brother under Section r Sections 420, 376, 295A, 493, 496, 506,
509, 511 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. #DelhiHighCourt@ShahnawazBJP#BJP
A woman running an NGO had filed complaint against Hussain and his brother. It was alleged Hussain's brother promised to marry her and raped her. #DelhiHighCourt@ShahnawazBJP#BJP
[Manish Sisodia remand] Delhi Court asks CBI to complete all confrontation exercises and Sisodia's examination and interrogation in the two days custody granted.
"...it is desired that during this period, the IO shall complete all the above confrontation exercise and also the examination and interrogation of the accused for the above said purposes," the court has said.
In his order, Special CBI judge MK Nagpal noted that he is extending Sisodia's remand because he is yet to be confronted with two material witnesses and one important file pertaining to Cabinet note prepared in respect to excise policy is also yet to be traced out.
They are asking the same questions again and again. It is mental harassment.
Sisodia: They are not using third degree. But sitting for eight to nine hours and answering same questions again and again, that too, is mental harassment.