What's interesting about this proposal in the context of #generative and Copyright: the place with the most creator-friendly legislation can have jurisdiction. Under the Berne Convention, it's where infringement occurs—so that could be the most creator-friendly place you chose.
https://twitter.com/bobehayes/status/1632146399692292097
That is to say, "allowing #generative AI research under ethical standards [...]" that require Copyright are already regulated by the most human-friendly, pro-creator, and jurisdiction is automatically (e.g. that's where data is hosted, service is used) as per Berne.
Thus, we have the tools to make this happen for #generative systems. Just need the guts to enforce them now before the U.S. court system normalizes exploitation that goes against Berne...
Subtweeting @GaryMarcus on this. I'm pretty sure we have the legislation we need, just need #AiEthics to grow a pair and step up.
(Using triggering words on purpose to stimulate action here. 😂 Those "breaking things" move much faster.)
(Using triggering words on purpose to stimulate action here. 😂 Those "breaking things" move much faster.)
https://twitter.com/GaryMarcus/status/1632146619645988864
For #generative, I actually expect international Copyright to break down within the next few years with people abandoning Berne implicitly or explicitly.
(Could happen sooner as we move into multipolar cold war scenario, mostly there already just waiting for the launch trailer.)
(Could happen sooner as we move into multipolar cold war scenario, mostly there already just waiting for the launch trailer.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
