Thread by @ncdave4life

@BenjaminYumi8 「1/8」Benjamin wrote, "It's scientifically impossible for a cause to have two different effects."

Huh? Did you just make that up?

https://twitter.com/BenjaminYumi8/status/1632608278092840960

@BenjaminYumi8 「2/8」Benjamin wrote, "Historically CO2 300ppm caused 1°C (pic 1 from NASA)."

I don't know what that means, nor what "pic 1 from NASA" is.

There's not been a 300 ppmv change in atmospheric CO2 level (during the Quaternary).

@BenjaminYumi8 「3/8」The current 420 ppmv is only about 240 ppmv above the very lowest levels seen in ice cores from near glacial maximums.
sealevel.info/co2.html

@BenjaminYumi8 「4/8」The Earth's surface temperature is said to average about 14°C.

So, by "caused 1°C" do you mean "caused a 1°C INCREASE in global temperatures"? Or what?

@BenjaminYumi8 「5/8」Benjamin wrote, "Science does not allow CO2 400 ppm also to cause 1°C. (Pic 2 info from NOAA)"

I don't know what that means, nor what "pic 2 info from NASA" is.

Global avg temperatures rose by roughly 0.6 to 0.9°C as CO2 levels rose by 105 ppmv:

sealevel.info/GISS_vs_UAH_an…

@BenjaminYumi8 「6/8」Benjamin wrote, "The only way around this is to add a lag between CO2 and temp."

I have no idea what "this" you're trying to get "around."

You do realize that CO2 is not the ONLY thing which affects global average temperature, right? RIGHT?

@BenjaminYumi8 「7/8」Benjamin wrote, "But if lag is added, science does not allow CO2 300 (pic 3 from NASA) and 400 ppm to correlate to 1°C (pic 4 from AGW)"

Sorry, I cannot decipher that.

@BenjaminYumi8 「8/8」Benjamin wrote, "What scientific observations does AGW have that align with the theory?"

If you're asking why CO2 and other so-called "GHGs" have a warming effect, I suggest you start with #1 to #10 here:
sealevel.info/learnmore.html…

@ThreadReaderApp @threaddotblue unroll