John McDonnell asks Suella Braverman to tone down her “inflammatory language” as it is putting asylum seekers, & the people who represent them, at risk.
Irresponsible extremist Braverman completely ignores his important request concerning her dangerous & divisive rhetoric.
Patrick Grady asks Braverman if she's ever met anyone who came to the UK on a small boat to ask about their hopes for the future, or look them in the eye & say they are not welcome.
Braverman completely ignores his question & says the bill provides a pragmatic solution.
Tommy Sheppard asks Braverman to confirm that it is the Govt’s intention to provoke exclusion from the Council of Europe (which oversees the ECHR) & says the bill is “vile & shameful”.
Braverman ignores the ECHR question & makes the absurd claim that the bill is 'compassionate'.
Khalid Mahmood says this plan is unworkable & is purely political, aimed at winning red wall seats, “at the expense of xenophobia & racism”.
Brass-necked Braverman says it is irresponsible to say anyone who wants to control migration numbers is racist. Mahmood didn't say this.
Joanna Cherry says the courts are going to find these measures contrary to international law & the European convention on human rights, & asks if the government intends to fight the next GE promising to withdraw from the ECHR.
Braverman ignores her question & mentions Rwanda.
Diane Abbott says she deplores Braverman’s attempt to try & smear immigrants as murderers & rapists & says her plans are “deplorable & unworkable”.
Braverman says it's wrong to conflate people coming here legitimately with those coming to the UK illegally. Abbott didn't do this.
Stuart C McDonald says there is no such thing as an illegal asylum seeker, & asks if Sunak will tell Macron that the UK would be willing to leave the ECHR.
Braverman ignores his question & criticises the Scottish Govt for not housing more asylum seekers.
Yvette Cooper says the Govt has promised to address this problem before, & the Bill risks making things worse.
Braverman accuses Cooper of “hysteria, histrionics & criticism” & lies by saying Labour don't want to stop small boats as they think it is “bigoted” to think like that.
Paula Barker says if Rwanda can only take 200 people, what will happen to the 44,000 other asylum seekers.
Dangerously irresponsible & delusional extremist Braverman says she is proud of the Rwanda deal & thanks fellow extremist Priti Patel for the work on the scheme.
Luke Pollard asks if LGBT asylum seekers may be sent back to countries where they may be persecuted, or if they will be sent to #Rwanda, where LGBT people face discrimination.
Braverman says if people are claiming asylum from a safe country, they should not be coming to the UK.
Pig-ignorant ideologically extreme nationalist Scott Benton says it is “completely unacceptable” that a foreign court can constrain what the government does & talks about 'interference' from 'foreign judges'.
Pig-ignorant ideologically extreme nationalist Jonathan Gullis says his constituents would welcome the Bill even more if the Govt said it'd derogate from the ECHR, & asks when hotels in his constituency will be cleared of asylum seekers.
Braverman ignores the hotels question.
Pig-ignorant ideologically extreme nationalist David Jones tells a grotesque outright lie when he says the bill is advocating the “correct & humane” approach. There is nothing humane about it. Braverman says he is “absolutely right”.
Pig-ignorant ideologically extreme nationalist Simon Clarke asks Braverman to commit to leaving the ECHR if the bill is frustrated.
Braverman says the Govt THINKS this bill is in line with international obligations.
Pig-ignorant ideologically extreme nationalist #30pLee claims that Starmer said, when asked if foreign murders & rapists should be deported, that it depended on the circumstances (which it obviously does).
Braverman says Lee's right to point out Labour's "shameless position".
Pig-ignorant ideologically extreme nationalist Nicolas Fletcher tells a grotesque outright lie, reminiscent of every fascist in British history, claiming that 'the UK is full'.
Braverman says he is right to say illegal migration is putting unsustainable pressures on the UK.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The first asks "Is it OK to smoke while I'm praying?"
The Pope replies "No! You should be focused on God!"
The second Priest asks "Is it OK to pray while I'm smoking?"
The Pope replies "Of course, there's never a bad time to pray"
Nigel Farage’s rhetorical technique of framing controversial or inflammatory statements as questions, often defended as “just asking questions,” is a well-documented strategy - sometimes called “JAQing off” in online discourse - that has drawn significant criticism.
This approach involves posing questions to imply a controversial viewpoint without explicitly endorsing it, thereby maintaining plausible deniability. Farage often uses this strategy to raise issues around immigration, national identity, and 'wokeness' or 'political correctness'.
The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) was a response to the atrocities of WWII and the Holocaust, designed to prevent such horrors reoccurring.
Withdrawing risks weakening human rights, international isolation, destabilised peace agreements, and authoritarian drift.
Adopted in 1950 by the Council of Europe, the ECHR was a collective response to the Holocaust, during which about 11 million people, including 6 million Jews, were systematically exterminated, exposing the urgent need for a legal framework to prevent such horrors from recurring.
The Council of Europe, established in 1949 to promote democracy, rule of law, and human rights, made the ECHR a cornerstone of its mission.
Influenced by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948), the ECHR ensured states uphold fundamental rights.
Comparing political rhetoric across eras is a sensitive task, as context, intent, and historical outcomes differ vastly.
In 1990, Ivana Trump said her husband Donald owned a copy of “My New Order” – a printed collection of Hitler's speeches – which he kept by the bedside...
Some of Trump’s statements have been noted by historians, critics, and media for echoing themes or phrasing used by Adolf Hitler, particularly in their dehumanizing language, scapegoating of groups, and authoritarian undertones.
Below, with @grok's help, I’ll provide examples of Trump’s quotes that have been cited as resembling Hitler’s rhetoric, alongside Hitler’s statements for comparison, drawing from credible sources, focusing on specific language & themes, ensuring accuracy, & avoiding exaggeration.
Most people know very little about Trump's new best friend, El Salvador’s strongman leader, Nayib Bukele, who's been sat in the White House being adored by Trump and his team of fawning, dangerously unhinged sociopathic bootlickers...
Read this excellent article by Professor of International Politics at Lancaster University, Amalendu Misra, the author of seven critically acclaimed monographs on conflict and peace, whose primary research concerns violence in the political process.
Trump has unleashed a string of controversial policies since returning to the White House that have put his administration at odds with most of the world. He's also forged an alliance with one country that is willing to do his bidding abroad: El Salvador.
The techno-dystopia many have warned about looks a lot closer today, after @WIRED revealed that Peter Thiel's #Palantir (which has a £500 million contract with #NHS England to manage our patient data across NHS trusts) is involved in Elon Musk’s DOGE.
If you're unaware of who unhinged billionaire tech-bro Peter Thiel is, and why he should have nothing to do with the UK or our #NHS, or how he groomed and installed his protégé JD Vance in the White House, or how he's not keen on democracy, read this:
The BMA are concerned about patient data privacy & Palantir’s ties to US intelligence.
DOGE, Palantir, & IRS representatives have been collaborating to build a single API layer above all IRS databases at an event previously characterized as a “hackathon.” publictechnology.net/2023/11/22/hea…
🧵 A scholar who specialises in how Universities respond to authoritarian pressure across different political systems, cultural contexts & historical moments warns that compliance with the Trump administration will not protect their funding & independence. theconversation.com/universities-i…
Many American universities, widely seen globally as beacons of academic integrity and free speech, are giving in to demands from the Trump administration, which has been targeting academia since it took office.
Even before seizing power in 1933, the Nazi Party was closely monitoring German universities through nationalist student groups & sympathetic faculty, flagging professors deemed politically unreliable – particularly Jews, Marxists, liberals & pacifists.