Empower Oversight transmitted a letter to the DOJ-OIG seeking confirmation that former FBI Special Agent Steve Friend’s concerns have not been “rejected” by his office, contrary to mischaracterizations in widely trumpeted congressional leaks.
"The abuse of the security clearance process to retaliate and force [Friend] out of his job is also a broader concern, of which Friend’s case is only one prominent example" - @tristanleavitt
"In short, the Democrats claimed that your office had rejected [Friend's] concerns. Thus, I write to confirm our understanding that their claim is false and that your office still intends to interview Friend" - @tristanleavitt
"It is our understanding that several media outlets uncritically repeated the Democrat staff report’s mischaracterizations without bothering to ask your office." - @tristanleavitt
"We know for certain that other outlets asked your office for comment and clarification to confirm our understanding of the current status of Friend’s case, but received no response." - @tristanleavitt
"This suggests a disturbing situation in which your office’s silence is allowing its reputation for neutrality and objectivity to be hijacked by partisans...to leave a false impression with the public—all in the service of undermining a #whistleblower" - @tristanleavitt
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
3. Reprisal or retaliation means taking and adverse personnel action, or colloquially speaking, any other form of retribution in response to a protected disclosure.
“[George] Hill and [Steve] Friend both are being advised by former Senate investigator Jason Foster, the head of Empower Oversight, a whistleblower support nonprofit.”
“[@JsnFostr], who worked for years under Sen. Chuck Grassley, said the whistleblowers have provided Congress with a portrait of the FBI that, ‘keeps feeding public suspicion that it's too focused on political narratives and not focused enough on fighting crime.’"
“After 9/11, everybody was upset that we didn't connect the dots. We didn't find a needle in the haystack, and what's happened since is we turned the FBI into a domestic surveillance organization, and now we collect tens of thousands of haystacks” - @JsnFostr
WATCH: @mirandadevine & @TuckerCarlson report on FBI Whistleblower Steve Friend’s protected disclosures about FBI misconduct in J6 cases. @EMPOWR_US has been helping him, but now that his identity is public, the retaliation will likely intensify.
We have been working with him and providing legal counsel. We can only help truthtellers like Steve Friend through your generous donations. If you would like to help, please consider supporting our efforts.
The FBI’s alleged violations include phony recordkeeping and excessive force. Friend was one of many field agents improperly listed as the “case agent” on J6 cases in the FBI’s system, contrary to reality and FBI regulations.
Empower Oversight secured important wins in its lawsuit against the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for its failure to respond to FOIA requests regarding COVID-19 genetic data deletion at the request of a Chinese researcher.
The judge ruled that because the names of the Chinese researcher and an NIH official had already been public, that they should no longer be under seal. This reverses a previous order that had prematurely granted the NIH request to seal the names.
Newly unredacted documents now reveal some of what the NIH has sought to prevent the public from knowing regarding its response to Members of Congress seeking information related to the origins of COVID-19.
Empower Oversight received an allegation that while Whitey Bulger was one of the FBI’s most wanted fugitives, the Bureau ignored a lead based on physical evidence reported by a local homicide detective in the area where Bulger was hiding.
Empower Oversight filed two FOIA requests, one request with the FBI and a second request with the DOJ-OIG seeking records related to the homicide detective’s tip to the FBI about a firearm that was allegedly connected to infamous crime boss Whitey Bulger.
On July 15, NIH requested that the name of a Chinese researcher and an NIH official be removed from filings, even though those names had been provided by NIH both in Empower Oversight’s litigation and in response to a previous FOIA request from another nonprofit years earlier.
On July 22, Empower Oversight filed its opposition to the NIH’s request within the permitted seven-day timeframe. But minutes earlier, a magistrate judge had entered an order prematurely granting the NIH request without having received or considered Empower Oversight’s arguments.