Empower Oversight asks Inspector General to Correct False Claim that his Office has Rejected FBI Whistleblower

empowr.us/empower-oversi…
Empower Oversight transmitted a letter to the DOJ-OIG seeking confirmation that former FBI Special Agent Steve Friend’s concerns have not been “rejected” by his office, contrary to mischaracterizations in widely trumpeted congressional leaks.

empowr.us/wp-content/upl…
"The abuse of the security clearance process to retaliate and force [Friend] out of his job is also a broader concern, of which Friend’s case is only one prominent example" - @tristanleavitt
"In short, the Democrats claimed that your office had rejected [Friend's] concerns. Thus, I write to confirm our understanding that their claim is false and that your office still intends to interview Friend" - @tristanleavitt
"It is our understanding that several media outlets uncritically repeated the Democrat staff report’s mischaracterizations without bothering to ask your office." - @tristanleavitt
"We know for certain that other outlets asked your office for comment and clarification to confirm our understanding of the current status of Friend’s case, but received no response." - @tristanleavitt
"This suggests a disturbing situation in which your office’s silence is allowing its reputation for neutrality and objectivity to be hijacked by partisans...to leave a false impression with the public—all in the service of undermining a #whistleblower" - @tristanleavitt

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Empower Oversight

Empower Oversight Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EMPOWR_us

Mar 6
1. A primer 🧵for those interested in actually learning:

@HouseJudiciary Democrat attacks on @FBI witnesses that @empwr_us helped as not "real" #whistleblowers are wrong on the law and factually baseless.
2. Legally speaking, a whistleblower is someone makes a "protected disclosure." Period. Nothing else.

A "protected disclosure" generally means a good faith effort to properly report waste, wrongdoing, or a safety concern.

3. Reprisal or retaliation means taking and adverse personnel action, or colloquially speaking, any other form of retribution in response to a protected disclosure.
Read 12 tweets
Feb 9
“[George] Hill and [Steve] Friend both are being advised by former Senate investigator Jason Foster, the head of Empower Oversight, a whistleblower support nonprofit.”

justthenews.com/accountability…
“[@JsnFostr], who worked for years under Sen. Chuck Grassley, said the whistleblowers have provided Congress with a portrait of the FBI that, ‘keeps feeding public suspicion that it's too focused on political narratives and not focused enough on fighting crime.’"
“After 9/11, everybody was upset that we didn't connect the dots. We didn't find a needle in the haystack, and what's happened since is we turned the FBI into a domestic surveillance organization, and now we collect tens of thousands of haystacks” - @JsnFostr
Read 5 tweets
Sep 22, 2022
WATCH: @mirandadevine & @TuckerCarlson report on FBI Whistleblower Steve Friend’s protected disclosures about FBI misconduct in J6 cases. @EMPOWR_US has been helping him, but now that his identity is public, the retaliation will likely intensify.
We have been working with him and providing legal counsel. We can only help truthtellers like Steve Friend through your generous donations. If you would like to help, please consider supporting our efforts.

secure.anedot.com/empower-oversi…
The FBI’s alleged violations include phony recordkeeping and excessive force. Friend was one of many field agents improperly listed as the “case agent” on J6 cases in the FBI’s system, contrary to reality and FBI regulations.
Read 7 tweets
Sep 21, 2022
Empower Oversight secured important wins in its lawsuit against the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for its failure to respond to FOIA requests regarding COVID-19 genetic data deletion at the request of a Chinese researcher.

empowr.us/judge-rejects-…
The judge ruled that because the names of the Chinese researcher and an NIH official had already been public, that they should no longer be under seal. This reverses a previous order that had prematurely granted the NIH request to seal the names.

empowr.us/wp-content/upl…
Newly unredacted documents now reveal some of what the NIH has sought to prevent the public from knowing regarding its response to Members of Congress seeking information related to the origins of COVID-19.

empowr.us/wp-content/upl…
Read 7 tweets
Aug 19, 2022
Empower Oversight Probes Allegation that FBI Ignored Evidence Related to Most Wanted Fugitive Whitey Bulger

empowr.us/empower-oversi…
Empower Oversight received an allegation that while Whitey Bulger was one of the FBI’s most wanted fugitives, the Bureau ignored a lead based on physical evidence reported by a local homicide detective in the area where Bulger was hiding.

empowr.us/wp-content/upl…
Empower Oversight filed two FOIA requests, one request with the FBI and a second request with the DOJ-OIG seeking records related to the homicide detective’s tip to the FBI about a firearm that was allegedly connected to infamous crime boss Whitey Bulger.

empowr.us/wp-content/upl…
Read 4 tweets
Jul 28, 2022
Empower Oversight Asks Judge to Set Aside Magistrate’s Erroneous Order to Seal Public Info in NIH Lawsuit

empowr.us/empower-oversi…
On July 15, NIH requested that the name of a Chinese researcher and an NIH official be removed from filings, even though those names had been provided by NIH both in Empower Oversight’s litigation and in response to a previous FOIA request from another nonprofit years earlier.
On July 22, Empower Oversight filed its opposition to the NIH’s request within the permitted seven-day timeframe. But minutes earlier, a magistrate judge had entered an order prematurely granting the NIH request without having received or considered Empower Oversight’s arguments.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(