I owe @KaylinEvergreen and Dionysos, one of my absolute _favorite_ Hellenic deities, a bit of attention. so here it is!
Dionysos, or "Bacchus" as he's been called in Greece and Rome, is an unusual addition to the Hellenic pantheon—a late addition, thought to be imported.
(1/x)
his own mythology seems to reflect the likelihood that the worship of Dionysos came in from the East: the general story is that he was born in Thrace, had a long period of wandering abroad, then returned to Greece—triumphantly drunk off his arse.
for Dionysos was a god of drunken revels and *ecstasy*.
that's how I first learned about him from Euripedes's stark play "The Bacchae", which describes how the king of Thebes, Pentheus, falls foul of Dionysos by attempting to forbid his worship.
Dionysos dupes Pentheus into dressing up as a girl (the scene was...let's just say that it turned out to be *relevant* to my own life as a trans person, and I took special note of it) and infiltrating a Bacchic revel, whence Pentheus's own mother tears him to shreds.
(4/x)
and she doesn't avoid punishment for the crime, either—that's the nature of Greek tragedy. one crime doesn't somehow *erase* another. a murder can be _just_ in the pages of Greek tragedy, and yet still a murder.
I suppose that's why I'm such a staunch moralist...
(5/x)
...Sophocles and Euripides were my moral instructors. I didn't end up a mere Christian barbarian like @ThisIsKyleR or @LarryTaunton or @MattWalshBlog, from my own moral perspective, these people have no certain morality. I wouldn't trust any of these people for a moment.
(6/x)
but I digress. back to Dionysos and "The Bacchae", which impressed me so much.
it didn't scare me away from Dionysos to learn that it was dangerous to trifle with him; one shouldn't expect a god of drunken ecstasy to be tame_. ecstasy can be glorious, but never *safe*.
(7/x)
the business with Dionysos encouraging Pentheus to disguise himself as a woman (and Pentheus gets really *into it*, too) hints at one of the chief traits of the deity: Bacchus is genderqueer. he's both masculine and feminine. he dances on either side of the M/F line.
(8/x)
he's both girlish and pretty, and an emphatically masculine bearded dad figure—that's one of Dionysos's most fascinating qualities, the fact that he's got such starkly different aspects in terms of gender presentation. Dionysos would break the @elonmusk / @mtaibbi brain.
(9/x)
that's *gods* for you! they can look like whoever they want, at different times, and Dionysos is quite a bit more variable than most.
strangely...he's in #CSLewis's #Narnia, in "Prince Caspian". which, uh...was probably a bad mistake, on Jack Lewis's part. a funny one.
(10/x)
the presence of Dionysos in "Prince Caspian" is much like the appearance of Father Christmas in "The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe": it shows how clumsy and shoddy the workmanship of #Narnia was. Narnia has little integrity, as a "subcreation". it's a thing of bits.
(11/x)
it's supposed to be its own world, separate from Earth, with its own creation and its own demise—and yet Earth things keep turning up in #Narnia, because #CSLewis was not a very good writer and he needed to prop up his fictional creation with whatever he could think of.
(12/x)
and Lewis had a bad habit of writing *allegorically*—that is to say, he wished to write things that were merely thinly disguised versions of his own Christian beliefs. Jack Lewis wanted to believe that Christianity somehow *superseded* classical paganism and now owned it.
(13/x)
he's not the only one who wants to believe this, of course! if you want an amusing taste of what Christians want to believe about the appearance of Dionysos in "Prince Caspian", here's Joshua McNall of @OKWUniv, writing a highly optimistic essay:
"How C.S. Lewis redeemed the pagan god of wine and wild parties."
somehow Mr. McNall thought Lewis had *tamed Dionysos* by putting him in an inept Christian allegory for children. the mind reels.
Aslan, #CSLewis's thinly disguised Jesus, was not stronger than Dionysos.
(15/x)
it's especially funny because Dionysos's appearance in "Prince Caspian" is actually quite *striking*. he's got his Maenads and Silenus is with him and they're having a grand time, and they destroy a bridge with vines, and it's wonderful! maybe the best thing in the book.
(16/x)
because it's *Dionysos*. Lewis borrowed Dionysos Eleutherios, the _Liberator_, to put in a book intended to shackle children to Christianity.
it was a mistake, Jack. a BAD mistake. I wonder if @PastorMark or @Franklin_Graham might pass along the word.
there's a *lie* that #CSLewis told about himself in public, frequently. there were a lot of lies that he told about himself in public—not _malicious_ lies, but still lies.
this is something that Western society has trouble with: grasping that lies need not be malicious.
(1/x)
if you say something factually incorrect, you're a *liar*, even if you believe the lies to be truths. @MattWalshBlog or @realchrisrufo BELIEVE their propaganda lies about trans people, and they double and treble and quadruple down on believing them, when challenged, but...
(2/x)
...that's exactly why they're fanatics, and why their lies ought not to be taken at face value: @MattWalshBlog &c. aren't able to withstand criticism of their propaganda. if they're called out for telling lies, they tell more of them, and more loudly. this is *fanaticism*.
the Pnictogen Wing has a hypothesis about @elonmusk's decision to ruin the public @Twitter API—it's not a hypothesis we've too much confidence in, but still we offer it: we think ONE of the purposes of doing this was to make Musk's own Twitter activities harder to analyze.
(1/x)
yes, there's lots of other reasons that the @elonmusk / @mtaibbi / @GOP#Twitter fash gang would have for destroying the ability of outsiders to write Twitter applications. the fash crowd themselves make heavy use of bots, sock-puppet accounts, and other Twitter trickery.
(2/x)
and of course there's also the fact that @elonmusk's been destroying @Twitter's ability to make money, long-term. he's in "vulture capitalist" mode—squeezing as much short-term money as he can from his own cultish #Twitter fandom before he finally auctions off the corpse.
there's a very vague idea for a thread I've been chasing around my head all day. let me see if I can tease it out. I'll tell you the starting point: the writing of Mr. William Gibson (@GreatDismal) and his oft-quoted sentiment that the very rich aren't remotely human.
(1/x)
that quote still *bothers* me. I've admitted this before (to Mr. @GreatDismal, even)—I have an immense inward aversion to thinking about anyone like that. even Elon Musk, grotesque as he is...I've tried over and over to find some trace of healthful human emotions in him.
(2/x)
it's taken me a long time to come to grips with what separates someone like @elonmusk (and this maybe goes for his fanclub too—@mtaibbi, @bariweiss, @ShellenbergerMD, whoever) from someone like me. and it's not the *money* and *privilege* and *success* I'm thinking about.
one thing that right-wing people (like @NateSilver538) don't quite get about being "right wing": whatever these people *call* themselves, however they choose to label themselves, in reality they're as *right wing* as their most extreme right-wing beliefs, firmly held.
(1/x)
@NateSilver538 endorses the racist conspiracy approach to the #COVID19 crisis, i.e. "permit millions to die while blaming it all on China", and that's a *far right wing* belief. it doesn't matter what ELSE Nate Silver thinks he believes—it's not likely he even quite knows.
(2/x)
(sadly, one can't assume that someone like @NateSilver538 is ever in possession of very much self-awareness. he lies to everyone, *especially* himself.)
even if Nate Silver has some vaguely liberal or leftist ideas, they're bound to wither and disappear over time.
purity is the obsession of bigots, who define themselves as perfect and hence demand perfection in others.
one sees that arrogance constantly in the behavior of bigots like @NateSilver538 and @Cernovich. they act like nothing matters more than their approval.
(1/x)
Christians habitually have been obsessed with purity and perfection, which they only ever find in things they can't really see. there's a kind of diffuse Gnostic fallacy that pervades Christianity—a belief that there's something intrinsically sinful about *matter itself*.
(2/x)
I value many of the insights of Gnostic Christians but I don't agree with that one—I can't make myself think of the physics and chemistry of the Cosmos as somehow *broken*. if the Gnostics are right, and the work of the Demiurge is flawed...I don't blame the *materials*.
I'd like to talk about one of the most reliable weapons of bigotry. it's especially a "toxic male" thing—you can view "toxic masculinity" as a form of bigotry, being bigoted about being male—but it's a general-purpose weapon for bigots. @bindelj and @Docstockk use it.
(1/x)
it's *indignation*. point out something unpleasant to a bigot, and they take refuge in sputtering "how could you ever say such a thing??"
the *indignant* person is basically throwing the entire conversation to the ground and stamping on it, refusing to communicate any further, for you've said something so _appalling_ that no more words can be said other than "you're insane" and "how could you" and so forth.