I was asked on @SkySportsNews why bidders not willing to match the Glazers' asking price of £6bn. This is one way how we crunch the numbers, the discounted cash flow model (DCF). First of all look at this historic performance of the club #MUFC
Then use those figures to work out historic relationships between income, costs, funding etc. Use those to create some working assumptions...and mine are fairly optimistic, 15% income growth pa and no major CAPEX investment for at least 5 years
On the basis of the assumptions project future growth of income, costs and perhaps most importantly cash.
Under a DCF model, the value of the club/company is the total cash estimated to be generated in future years, taking into account we would rather have £1 today than in a year or two year's time.
Calculate what is known as a 'terminal value, which is the estimate of cash from 2028 onwards by using a bit of financial maths and assuming that investors want (a fairly low) 8% return on their investment. This values the whole business as £2.9bn.
Give the banks back what is owed to them first, and this means the shares come out at a figure of $17.35 a share...and the Glazers want about $30. Only reason to pay it is if there are cash flows that no one has at yet unlocked, so can understand why QSI might walk away
Difficult to see why anyone would think that #MUFC is worth 20x what PIF paid for #NUFC from Mike Ashley. Not disputing that Manchester United has a bigger global fanbase, but turning that into cash is the challenge.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Wigan new owners Phoenix 2021 publish 2022 accounts, the first full figs since former owner (and 5* Wrong 'Un) Au Yeung, put the club into admin weeks after buying it for unknown reasons**
**will spill the beans for anyone who buys me a jar of Marmite
Revenue down compared to 2019 (last year for which full figs available) due to being in L1. Down 85% on WAFC final season in Premier League
Broadcast income by far the largest component for a club such as Wigan in PL and whilst receiving parachutes. Once in L1, only get 12% of the EFL deal compared to 80% in Championship
Leicester City publish their 2021/22 accounts. 🔑numbers:
Revenue ⬇️5% to £215m
Wages ⬇️ 5% to £182m
Day to day losses ⬆️ 20% to £79m
Interest costs ⬆️68% to £19m
Player purchases £67m
Player sales £13m
Borrowings £343m but over half written off recently
Revenue down but partly due to technical reasons with extra PL matches being played in year 1 June 2020 to 31 May 2021 due to lockdown
Matchday income at a record £21m, previous season was in front of empty stadiums
Stoke City made a £29m loss from day to day operations in 21/22, down from £46m the previous year but…. #SCFC
…player sale profits reduced this by £10m. A loan from Bet365 of £120m that was never going to be repaid has been formally agreed as never going to be repaid
Stoke had over £50m in the bank at end of 21/22. Excluding the unusual stadium sale profits and debt write off the club has made operating losses over the years of £233 million.
With almost have the Premier League clubs having reported their 2021/22 financial results, here is a short summary of what has been seen to date.
Income up overall 16%. Return from covid more than offset fewer games played than in 2021/22 (which had 7-9 more PL matches in the financial year due to lockdown March-June 2020)
Spurs investment in new stadium paying off as matchday income now only behind MUFC and would have been higher with better cup runs. Arsenal used to be £100m plus but lack of UEFA participation was costly
Wolves had day to day losses of £58m in 2021/22. Insurance claim and player sale profits reduced this to ‘just’ £40m, before interest costs added a further £5m to expenses
Wolves had over £31m in the bank at end of 21/22
Wolves spent £29m more cash than they generated in day to day trading. Net cash player spend was £11m. As a result Club had to borrow a further £44m from banks