I wonder - speculating - if they'll regret this. A bit like Brexit: getting everything they want isn't what they want.
Suspending #GaryLineker just politicises the audience of one of the UKs most popular people. And making people aware of politics doesn't help the Tories.
Sure, there will be people who want Linaker gone, and people who don't. But in the middle, a huge group not really paying attention to politics, who suddenly have to choose between a much-loved, highly likeable footballing hero, and Suella Braverman, aka Joseph Gerbils.
And the BBC may be making a mistake too. Linaker is very rich, and could waltz into the same job on any channel for 2x the pay. To coin a phrase, they need him more than he needs them.
Doing this to curry favour with the govt won't work. They will NEVER suddenly love the BBC.
The beeb can ONLY lose here. And I think (perhaps) the govt can only lose too.
Gary Lineker is a famously decent (never booked), hugely likeable presence in everybody's living room.
Not words I'd apply to anybody in the govt.
So I wonder if they've gone too far, and all the gloating from Nadine Dorries etc is just the latest example of them being thick enough to stand a spoon up in.
Maybe I'm in a bubble, but I don't see this going well for the right. Be careful what you wish for.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
- So you'll keep refugees 28 days?
- Yep
- Then remove them?
- Yep
- What happens to those you can't remove in 28 days?
- We remove them too
- Where?
- [Linguistic soup]
- What?
- I mean, something something Rwanda
- But Rwanda policy is paused pending appeal
- Or we'll send them back to their own country
- Which is it, Rwanda or back home?
- Home
- But you can legally do that now
- But now we WILL do it. Grrrr!
- You already have a backlog of 166000 unprocessed people
- This time it'll be better. 43rd time's the charm
I'll advertise how great it is. World-beating, in fact.
But there will be a 100 ft high wall around the 100 mile perimeter, and no gate.
No illegal entry. Or legal entry.
Then I'm gonna spend YEARS whining about the cost of security.🧵
The only way in will be to scale the wall, which is dangerous and illegal, and loads of people die, while giving all their money to the network of previously unheard-of "ladder gangs" that mysteriously sprung up when I built a massive wall.
But I can stop all this. Trust me.
I'm gonna have - and this is no exaggeration - a new "no entry" policy every month for a decade, and 43 different "definitely no entry if you're wet" policies.
I'm going to tell everybody inside that we're being invaded, and they need to leave me in charge so I can prevent it.
Thread on Sue Gray's terrible lack of independence.
1. Johnson appointed her.
2. For a long time, Tories used her independence as a reason why Johnson shouldn't quit - we "had to wait for Gray".
3. The Police matched Sue Gray's findings - are they part of the Labour plot too?
4. Johnson accepted Gray's findings
5. So did the Tory party
6. So did the police
7. There were 126 fines handed down, and 57 ministers quit to force Johnson out
8. There is no law or precedent to stop somebody taking a new job 12 months after writing an independent report
9. There is no law or precedent to stop civil servants going to work for a political party - David Frost was a civil servant too, and Johnson made him a govt minister
10. How many people working in Westminster do you suppose have NO view on politics? Why shouldn't they?
In 2016 Johnson wanted to lose the referendum so he could be "king over the water" for frustrated xenophobes in the Tory membership, and succeed Cameron without ever having to do anything as stupid as Brexit.
All Johnson has to do is keep saying "no" to everything, and the Brexit ultras in his party will love him. And that's his route back to the centre of attention, which is all be wants
I don't wanna help Tories. But Sunak should make backing Windsor Agreement into a 3 line whip.
If Johnson votes against it, withdraw the whip and get him out of the party. Same with the other ultras. If Sunak lets them stay, they'll torture his leadership forever.
He's gonna lose the next GE anyway. He's got a 70+ majority, so can risk losing 30 troublesome MPs
Look at this idiot, delighted the thing he voted for is being undone. For a decade we've been held hostage by this self-styled "hard man", with his smug look of somebody desperate to be asked if they've finished their Rubik's Cube. He's done irreparable harm and cannot admit it.
Reckons he's the sharpest tool in the box of absolute tools from the ERG, and calls himself a "numbers man". Launched his move to oust May based on hitting the required votes. Was 10 votes short. Can't even count to 52, yet so much brighter than the others that they followed him
They can follow him into a fucking combine harvester for all I care. I can't wait for him and his wretched, self-absorbed, clattering band of xenophobic baboons to be hurled from public life, and never have any influence again.