Both sides of the Gulf (& larger MENA) deserve a normal, peaceful, & (dare I say) prosperous region. Many are breathing a sigh of relief w/ today’s official Iran-Saudi agreement. All 3 parties to the deal can claim victory, but Saudis are arguably the biggest winner. Why? A 🧵
1. A rapprochement was imminent given the last 2 yrs of talks in Iraq & Oman. So that’s not the surprise - China is! It scores a point against the US in their great power competition, stepping beyond its usual economic & arguably transactional, or at most, short-term arrangements
1 cont.) Iran & now KSA are willing to give China that role. But let’s not beat the bushes on what it means for US standing in KSA & the GCC. No Chinese mediation - or any diplomatic involvement - will threaten US primacy in the region. All states, Iran included, know that.
2. This shouldn’t be a zero sum game for the US. It can serve US interests: Iran nuclear deal, Yemen, Lebanon for starters can benefit from the agreement. A quick move should follow on these files b/c the agreement may not last long. Might as well reap benefits while it lasts.
3. Certainly hope for the agreement to live on & lead to the prosperity its people long & deserve. But neither KSA nor Iran will change overnight. Particularly true for Iran: respecting the sovereignty of other nations & non interference is a BIG ask for Iran.
3 cont.) This big ask requires course correction from Iran or we end w/ policy gymnastics to reconfigure definitions of sovereignty + non-interference! Saudi course correction is much easier entailing media related files & ending its involvement in Yemen, an expressed Saudi aim.
4) Iran scores by reducing internal tensions w/ a foreign policy win. Yet it’s still in “survival” mode w/ a failing economy & disgruntled populace. That’s where Saudi is the biggest winner in this agreement, whether it lasts or not.
5) KSA has been deescalating w/ all its neighbors since al-Ula Summit of Jan 2021. Iran was the outlier & now it’s no longer the case. This will pave the way for a quicker settlement in Yemen (for KSA at least - Yemen is still bound for more intra-group conflict).
5b cont.) Second, Saudi will be able to bulldoze its way through its econ & social reform agenda w/o external political headaches & destabilizing activities by its borders or oilfields. This “future bulldoze” mode is in stark contrast to Iran’s “domestic strife & stagnancy” mode.
5c cont) Finally, KSA will win over China when agreement is put to the test. China is sensitive to interference & sovereignty issues, evidenced by the Xinjiang file. Having a superpower guarantor to the agreement will expose Iran if it continues its behavior. What will China do?
6) In that sense, we’ll wait and see how the Iran-Saudi rapprochement unfolds. More lessons can be deduced from today’s step but that’s a topic for another thread or piece! MENA politics never fails to disappoint. #IranAndSaudiArabia
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Current Saudi-US spat is actually good news for both countries. Why so & where is the relationship heading? A thread.
Disagreement has an upside: it forces one to relearn/update info about the other side. No one remains static & this can’t be truer about Saudi right now.
1/12
Disagreements flare up every decade or so between both states. When the events of the past few weeks are measured against past spats, history shows they’re neither new nor phenomenal no matter the hype we hear about the “dramatic” turn of events.
2/12
Past disagreements abound:
Palestine, '73 oil embargo, 9/11, 2nd Gulf War, Arab Spring, oil policy, JCPOA, Kashoggi, & the everlasting difference of opinion over human rights. The list continues.
This is not the first disagreement and will not be the last.
There is a new gov in #Kuwait. What does the composition tell us? A 🧵
1. Technically, this is a cabinet reshuffle w/ gov formation on Oct 5 & next day resignation of ministers (Oct 6) after the fallout w/ the minister MP whose inclusion is necessary for gov validity (Art. 56).
2. Quota system persists, but it has drastically weakened even when compared to Oct 5 formation. One Shiite (as usual), but less keenness on having most tribes represented leading to a notable reduction in tribal background ministers.
3.Only 2 ministers remain from former PM al-Khalid’s cabinets (finance+comms). They’ll be under the spotlight. Not counting the PM (former interior) & interior minister (former defense) who joined Khalid’s gov a month before its resignation or Sheetan who served in a previous gov
Thread: MBS appeared on TV in a 90-min interview to commemorate 5-yr anniversary of Vision 2030. Not much controversy was expected given the Saudi state’s sponsorship of the event. Timing, presenter, & setup point toward nationalist agenda & local audience, but messages go beyond
Interview served 2 main purposes: reaffirm CP’s continuous command of KSA & its local transformation; accentuate recent FP shifts through a revamped persona & realist positions. Extent to which both messages win over though depends less on talk and more on actions on the ground.
Domestic agenda occupied the lion’s share. Key theme was the regime’s success in building a center of gov that can run the country. Previous monarchs may beg to differ, but CP gave concrete examples of what that means: strategy, policies, & budget no longer reside in ministries.
THREAD: As expected, it is decrees season in #Oman. Sultan #Haitham just announced 10 more decrees today. Most important of them is the promotion of #Shihab bin Tariq to deputy prime minister for #defense affairs. What are the implications of this decision?
2. Shihab bin Tariq (b. 1955) is the sultan's full, younger brother (by a year). Shihab and Haitham were part of the candidates list for sultan alongside their half brother, #Asaad. Shihab was #Qaboos's advisor (2004-20) and head of the research council among other duties.
3. Between 1990-04, Shihab was Commander of the Royal Navy of Oman. Shihab joins the government alongside his brothers, the sultan and Asaad. Both Asaad and Shihab are equally ranked at deputy prime minister. Yet are they really equal?