Ugly week for #REITs. Bought the CA heavy stuff hard today:
$KRC -10.7% overall cap. Office is 13+% stripping out MF/LifeSci @ 6.
$ARE -6.5%
$ESS -5.9%; 370k/door
$EQR -6.1%; $372k/d
I $SIVB $FRC $SBNY $PACW doesn't sink the SF Bay/CA economy
non CA:
$MAA -5.9%; $218k/d
I'm implicitly betting the the troubled banks don't F up the golden goose of the SF Bay /LA VC ecosystem. Yes many wannabe unicorns had deposits there but I believe recoveries will be 80%+ of funds. Might lead to some incremental job losses but not the end of the world
I am concerned about general banking problems (which could continue to spill into RE and/or REIT). $BAC appears to have $100+ BN in unrecognized Held to Maturity securities. Others must as well. Could get ugly out there.
But the balance sheets of the REITs are solid. Having access to the corporate debt market is a big advantage. REITs don't need the banks. In general, REIT leverage is low. Most of the debt is fixed rate, long-term. Supply is manageable.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/n Higher/rising rates $TLT & 2023/24 unit deliveries have weighed on #multifamily#REITs $AVB $CPT $EQR $ESS $MAA $UDR over the past year. I see the credit events $SIVB $FRC $SBNY $KBE of the past week being a positive for the sector as:
2/n Small/Med banks are a key lender to developers. Last week (prior to bank crisis), at Citi conf $MAA CEO said that new MF permitting had come to a halt due to rising rates/spreads/const costs. Bank crisis will further curtail development. LOWER SUPPLY
3/n 10y now below 3.5%. MF REITS are low leverage (sub 30% LTVs) and primarily access debt financing through corporate bond market. While banks will be reticent to lend, I see debt costs for the REITs heading lower
1/n So I posted this in reply to another thread but wanted to see if I can find more pushback. Clearly people have been disappointed with $ATUS 1Q net adds, particularly versus $CHTR and $CMCSA. However, I think there is plenty of evidence which... @FrancoOlivera@AndrewRangeley
2/ A) 1-3Q20: People flee NYC in droves, many end up (temporarily) in $ATUS footprint and register as net adds in 2020. Slide below is from a Nov2020 presentation by $UDR, an apartment REIT with exposure to NYC area:
3/ This was openly acknowledged by $ATUS last year's 2Q call. Unlike $CHTR/ $CMCSA, ATUS has highly concentrated footprint where 60-65% of biz is in areas(i.e. the old CVC assets) in a position to benefit from this in 2020. @maffei_fake
$KRC CEO John Kilroy says he believes the stock is trading at a 1/3 discount to NAV on $C Citi Property CEO conference. Kilroy Oyster Point Ph 2 (Life sciences $ARE) to start this summer. Will also start development of new life sciences project in San Diego. KRC has plenty of $
for development. May also repurchase shares/pay special dividend. #reits#dividends#dividendstocks Great track record of value creation via development - should trade at a premium to NAV. I think this is worth $100-120 per share.
I estimate today's $1.1 bn sale of The Exchange was done at a ~4% cap rate. Tenant is $DBX who has leased space until 2023 but is looking to sublease.
The RATE-ARDs at $MCO Moody's and S&P $SPGI have too much influence over companies - case in point is $INVH which owns 80k single family homes with a loan-to-value (LTV) of just 32%. Somehow this company is NOT 'investment grade' and they are de-levering...
2/ to appease these idiot rating agencies. Consider that people typically put down only 5-10% of the purchase price of a home (the rest is financed with a mortgage at an LTV of 80%+). Of course there is one recent example of a situation where the US housing market blew up -caused
3/by rating agencies who in pursuit of fees did whatever $BAC $GS $MS $C $JPM etc told them too - rating hundred$ of billion$ in garbage debt as investment grade creating a housing bubble followed by a global financial crisis truthout.org/articles/the-i…
Inflation $TLT worries=opportunity to invest in single family rental leader Invitation Homes $INVH. At $28/sh implies 4.8% 2021 cap rate. Trades at ~5-10% discount to NAV.
$AVB $EQR $CPT $MAA $ESS $VNQ $AMH $XLRE #reits#dividends
SHOULD trade at premium to NAV->Platform value:
2/While anyone can buy a home and become a landlord, this is a scale/density business. To effectively manage single family homes bigger is MUCH better. Scale allows for in-house provision of services (hire a plumber full time for $200/day rather than pay $150 for each visit).
3/Route density is also critical. On average, INVH owns at 5,000 homes per market. Can cluster maintenance jobs. This has lead to NOI margins of ~67%. Put simply, with scale INVH retains more of each rental $ as profit than competitors.