What a day for the #BBC yesterday

Lost all their #MOTD presenters after @GaryLineker wouldnโ€™t apologise for criticising the government (read that again!๐Ÿ˜ฑ)

And while that was obviously the big story, their bad day didnโ€™t end thereโ€ฆ.

1/7
They announced theyโ€™d wouldnโ€™t be airing the final episode of the latest #Attenborough series on TV for fear of a โ€œRight Wing backlashโ€

WTF?

It will go out on iPlayer where the poor snowflakes wonโ€™t see itโ€ฆ.

2/7
Then we had the statement about why #FionaBruce felt the need to clarify it was a โ€œone offโ€ when #stanleyjohnson put his wife in hospital๐Ÿ˜ฑ

Yes, she was quoting one of their friends and not expressing her own opinion, but of all the things to ensure they clarified..?

3/7
Finally, an apology for NOT clarifying on air that Nadine Dorries was making unfounded, absurd claims when she was interviewed about #SueGray.

They were happy to let those accusations go unchallenged, but needed to add โ€œbalanceโ€ by pointing out SJ only beat his wife once!

4/7
I really want to support the BBC

Even more so because the government are so keen to shut it down (God knows why!)

I do hate the inherent right wing bias under the cover of โ€œimpartialityโ€ but I try and give them the benefit of the doubt

5/7
But oh my God do they make that hard when they:

โŒSilence govt critics
โŒRefuse to air a show that might offend Right wing watchers (an Attenborough nature program FGS!)
โŒDefend a Tory wife beater
โŒFail to correct spurious accusations made by a Tory MP

6/7
I really hope there are some serious emergency meetings taking place today after the shocking day they had yesterday

But given all the high level posts are held by well known Tories and Tory donors, I wonโ€™t hold my breath

Please, please #BBC, do better for all our sakes.๐Ÿ˜ข

7/7
Iโ€™m being accused of lying with this thread. As far as I can tell the issue is with the Attenborough tweet.

The Guardian report what senior BBC sources have said.

The BBC are denying thatโ€™s the reason. Although they donโ€™t really give a reason why they couldnโ€™t broadcast it.
I donโ€™t know which is โ€œthe truthโ€. Only the BBC and those senior sources do.

It was a 5 part series with a 6th part made by the same people but not commissioned by the BBC. However the BBC acquired it and chose to put it on iPlayer.

But I hope this clarifies things.

โ€ข โ€ข โ€ข

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
ใ€€

Keep Current with Emma ๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

Emma ๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’™๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MonkEmma

May 13
Well, that Express headline was always going to raise a few eyebrows!๐Ÿ˜ณ

Starmer is responsible for embracing polygamy to appease Muslims, and so he's increasing their benefits??

That's the implication.

After all, this "started in April", right?

Wrong!

๐Ÿงต1/25 Express Headline:  DWP increases benefits for husbands with 2 or more wives - Started in April
As ever, the first place to check is the article itself.

The Express doesn't make finding context, nuance, or explanation easy!

๐Ÿ‘‡I had to scroll through 8 adverts, 2 blocks of links to other clickbait stories, and a newsletter signup block before reaching anything explanatory

2/Example of the eight adverts I had to scroll through
Example of the 2 other article clickbait story blocks I had to scroll through
A sign up block I needed to scroll through.
So let's look at the situation objectively.

Polygamous marriage is illegal in the UK.

However, people who have entered into a polygamous marriage while living in a country where that is legal will have that marriage status recognised in the UK under certain circumstances

3/ Extract from the Express article: Although bigamy is illegal in the UK, the act of marrying more than one person at a time - polygamy - is not illegal if the marriages took place overseas. This is legal where a person has married multiple wives (or husbands) overseas while legally living in a country where this is legally allowed, and then moved to the UK legally afterwards.
Read 11 tweets
Mar 17
๐Ÿงต
These stories really are coming thick and fast at the moment๐Ÿ™„

Guess what?

The Canadian school is NOT 'banning food at lunchtime' during Ramadan๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ

Obviously...

And if you BELIEVED it to be true, then you need to ask why you would choose to believe such an obviously ludicrous headline?

1/20Image
This story began with an account on X sharing an email from a Canadian middle school (ages 9-15) to parents about lunchtime arrangements during Ramadan, and demanding that people online harass the school

I'll come to the details of the email shortly.

First, a quick look at the Tanya Gaw...

2/A Twitter post by Tanya Gaw calls for action against a Canadian school's Ramadan lunchtime arrangements, urging public contact.
Tanya Gaw is the Founder of Action4Canada.

They want to 'Protect Canada's rich heritage, which is founded on Judeo-Christian biblical principles'.

They also happen to be anti-vax, anti-15min cities, anti-UN, anti-Trans, anti-abortion, anti-immigration, 5G obsessed...๐Ÿ™„

3/ Profile of Tanya Gaw, founder of Action4Canada, featuring her photo and a quote on freedom and rights. Background emphasizes her organizationโ€™s mission.
Website homepage for Action4Canada featuring sections on popular topics, including political Islam, food security, and vaccination.
Website layout for Action4Canada highlighting various current issues like abortion, climate change, and political topics with donation call to action.
A graphic urging to stop mass immigration to Canada, featuring bold text and logos of various email services, indicating inbox censorship.
Read 20 tweets
Mar 11
Oh boy! What a headline...

Ask yourself:

"What am I being asked to believe?"

"Who am I being told to blame?"

Take a few seconds to imagine what the Daily Mail (And Telegraph, GB News and Express) WANT you to think is going on.

Let's see what's ACTUALLY happening...๐Ÿงต

1/21 Daily Mail Headline:  Pupils' drawings could be blasphemous under Islamic law, Labour councils tell schools - while music and dance classes may go against the teachings of Islam
Firstly, you are definitely supposed to blame Labour for this

After all, it is something Labour councils are telling schools while a Labour government is in power

Right?

This is the "offending" document causing the outrage in the RW media today, in March 2026

A document published in 2023...

2/Six characters representing diverse faiths and beliefs, surrounded by colorful shapes, promoting awareness in schools by Calderdale Council.
Yup, under the previous Tory government.

"But it was published by LABOUR councils!"๐Ÿ˜ค

Yes, that particular document was.

However, Essex and Hampshire - both Tory councils - also have the same types of guidelines, both published in or before 2017

This is nothing new and nothing "Labour" driven

3/Document from Essex Standing Advisory Council on Religious Education focusing on accommodating pupils' religious obligations.
Hampshire SACRE advice for schools A teacher assists a group of children engaged in a creative activity, emphasizing topics related to religion and faith.
Read 21 tweets
Mar 8
Today we have a double debunk:

1. A debunk of the idea that 67 dog breeds are being banned in Britain

2. A debunk of what the usual suspects are saying online (because they are so tediously predictable!๐Ÿ™„)

๐Ÿงต1/21 Image
The article opens with the giveaway that this isn't what's actually happening but is a warning from "campaigners" and "critics"

The Daily Mail points us to the Times to find out where this list of 67 dog breeds that could be banned comes from...

2/ Screenshot from the Daily Mail article: Sixty-seven dog breeds could be banned in Britain if new breeding guidelines set by parliament become mandatory, campaigners have warned. The all-party parliamentary group (APPG) for animal welfare has launched a new tool to determine if a dog is healthy.
Screenshot from Daily Mail article: But critics have cautioned the new criteria will see some 67 of the most popular types of dog in the UK automatically dubbed unhealthy, according to The Times.
And here it is.

The breeds that Kennel Club members FEAR are at risk*

And the asterisk?

*List being shared among members...

So not an official list of breeds, just a speculative one.

There are just two individuals quoted in The Times as 'critics'

3/ Image
Read 21 tweets
Mar 4
Did you see this headline?

Did you feel the requisite anger and rage at asylum seekers that The Sun was asking of you?

Did you maybe blame Starmer because.... um... it was probably his fault๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ

Would you like to know the reality behind the headline?

Course you would!๐Ÿ˜œ

Let's take a look

๐Ÿงต

1/25Sun headline about ยฃ500k compensation for migrants, discussing human rights, and public outcry over payouts.
๐Ÿšจ The FACTS ๐Ÿšจ

This was a Sun "exclusive" following an FOI, but the story itself is a couple of years old

In 2022, the High Court found that the Home Office and the then Home Secretary Priti Patel, had been acting unlawfully with respect to asylum seekers from April to November 2020

2/
During this time:

1,300+ Asylum seekers had their phones unlawfully seized on arrival

400+ phones have NEVER been returned as the Home Office didn't keep accurate records of who they took them from

3 asylum seekers took the government to court in late 2020, having had their phones seized

3/
Read 25 tweets
Mar 1
OK, the Gorton and Denton by-election, I have some thoughts!

Let's take a look at some of the FACTS and burst a few of the more ridiculous takes doing the rounds

But first up, can we acknowledge just what bad losers Reform are?!๐Ÿคฃ

Right, let's get started...

๐Ÿงต 1/
Reform believe they're the "silent" majority

They can't compute that their brand of divisive, blame-your-neighbour politics doesn't wash when bots can't vote!

They are blaming Muslims and Commonwealth citizens for their G&D loss

But they also lost in 97% White British, 0.3% Muslim, Caerphilly๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
2/Screenshot from BBC Technology website:  Bot or not: Are fake accounts swaying voters toward Reform UK?  Picture of a man and a robot holding Reform UK arrow signs
Let's all take a look at the reality in G&D

It's an odd constituency made up of 2 parts

The Gorton bit (2/3) More ethnically diverse, more Muslim, younger, with more uni students and graduates

The Denton bit (1/3) older, more white, working class

graph from๐Ÿ‘‡

3/open.substack.com/pub/swingometeโ€ฆGraph from https://open.substack.com/pub/swingometer/p/the-gorton-and-denton-by-election showing the demographic differences between the Tameside and Manchester wards of Gorton and Denton Tameside wards average: - 82.6% white - 5.9% Muslim - 86.2% born in the UK - 6.2% full-time student - 22.5% graduate Manchester wards average: - 41.9% white - 39.4% Muslim - 61.9% born in the UK - 11.8% full-time student - 30.3% graduate
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(