Lost all their #MOTD presenters after @GaryLineker wouldnโt apologise for criticising the government (read that again!๐ฑ)
And while that was obviously the big story, their bad day didnโt end thereโฆ.
1/7
They announced theyโd wouldnโt be airing the final episode of the latest #Attenborough series on TV for fear of a โRight Wing backlashโ
WTF?
It will go out on iPlayer where the poor snowflakes wonโt see itโฆ.
2/7
Then we had the statement about why #FionaBruce felt the need to clarify it was a โone offโ when #stanleyjohnson put his wife in hospital๐ฑ
Yes, she was quoting one of their friends and not expressing her own opinion, but of all the things to ensure they clarified..?
3/7
Finally, an apology for NOT clarifying on air that Nadine Dorries was making unfounded, absurd claims when she was interviewed about #SueGray.
They were happy to let those accusations go unchallenged, but needed to add โbalanceโ by pointing out SJ only beat his wife once!
4/7
I really want to support the BBC
Even more so because the government are so keen to shut it down (God knows why!)
I do hate the inherent right wing bias under the cover of โimpartialityโ but I try and give them the benefit of the doubt
5/7
But oh my God do they make that hard when they:
โSilence govt critics
โRefuse to air a show that might offend Right wing watchers (an Attenborough nature program FGS!)
โDefend a Tory wife beater
โFail to correct spurious accusations made by a Tory MP
6/7
I really hope there are some serious emergency meetings taking place today after the shocking day they had yesterday
But given all the high level posts are held by well known Tories and Tory donors, I wonโt hold my breath
Please, please #BBC, do better for all our sakes.๐ข
7/7
Iโm being accused of lying with this thread. As far as I can tell the issue is with the Attenborough tweet.
The Guardian report what senior BBC sources have said.
The BBC are denying thatโs the reason. Although they donโt really give a reason why they couldnโt broadcast it.
I donโt know which is โthe truthโ. Only the BBC and those senior sources do.
It was a 5 part series with a 6th part made by the same people but not commissioned by the BBC. However the BBC acquired it and chose to put it on iPlayer.
But I hope this clarifies things.
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Well, that Express headline was always going to raise a few eyebrows!๐ณ
Starmer is responsible for embracing polygamy to appease Muslims, and so he's increasing their benefits??
That's the implication.
After all, this "started in April", right?
Wrong!
๐งต1/25
As ever, the first place to check is the article itself.
The Express doesn't make finding context, nuance, or explanation easy!
๐I had to scroll through 8 adverts, 2 blocks of links to other clickbait stories, and a newsletter signup block before reaching anything explanatory
2/
So let's look at the situation objectively.
Polygamous marriage is illegal in the UK.
However, people who have entered into a polygamous marriage while living in a country where that is legal will have that marriage status recognised in the UK under certain circumstances
๐งต
These stories really are coming thick and fast at the moment๐
Guess what?
The Canadian school is NOT 'banning food at lunchtime' during Ramadan๐คฆโโ๏ธ
Obviously...
And if you BELIEVED it to be true, then you need to ask why you would choose to believe such an obviously ludicrous headline?
1/20
This story began with an account on X sharing an email from a Canadian middle school (ages 9-15) to parents about lunchtime arrangements during Ramadan, and demanding that people online harass the school
I'll come to the details of the email shortly.
First, a quick look at the Tanya Gaw...
2/
Tanya Gaw is the Founder of Action4Canada.
They want to 'Protect Canada's rich heritage, which is founded on Judeo-Christian biblical principles'.
They also happen to be anti-vax, anti-15min cities, anti-UN, anti-Trans, anti-abortion, anti-immigration, 5G obsessed...๐
Did you feel the requisite anger and rage at asylum seekers that The Sun was asking of you?
Did you maybe blame Starmer because.... um... it was probably his fault๐คทโโ๏ธ
Would you like to know the reality behind the headline?
Course you would!๐
Let's take a look
๐งต
1/25
๐จ The FACTS ๐จ
This was a Sun "exclusive" following an FOI, but the story itself is a couple of years old
In 2022, the High Court found that the Home Office and the then Home Secretary Priti Patel, had been acting unlawfully with respect to asylum seekers from April to November 2020
2/
During this time:
1,300+ Asylum seekers had their phones unlawfully seized on arrival
400+ phones have NEVER been returned as the Home Office didn't keep accurate records of who they took them from
3 asylum seekers took the government to court in late 2020, having had their phones seized
3/