What a day for the #BBC yesterday

Lost all their #MOTD presenters after @GaryLineker wouldn’t apologise for criticising the government (read that again!😱)

And while that was obviously the big story, their bad day didn’t end there….

1/7
They announced they’d wouldn’t be airing the final episode of the latest #Attenborough series on TV for fear of a “Right Wing backlash”

WTF?

It will go out on iPlayer where the poor snowflakes won’t see it….

2/7
Then we had the statement about why #FionaBruce felt the need to clarify it was a “one off” when #stanleyjohnson put his wife in hospital😱

Yes, she was quoting one of their friends and not expressing her own opinion, but of all the things to ensure they clarified..?

3/7
Finally, an apology for NOT clarifying on air that Nadine Dorries was making unfounded, absurd claims when she was interviewed about #SueGray.

They were happy to let those accusations go unchallenged, but needed to add “balance” by pointing out SJ only beat his wife once!

4/7
I really want to support the BBC

Even more so because the government are so keen to shut it down (God knows why!)

I do hate the inherent right wing bias under the cover of “impartiality” but I try and give them the benefit of the doubt

5/7
But oh my God do they make that hard when they:

❌Silence govt critics
❌Refuse to air a show that might offend Right wing watchers (an Attenborough nature program FGS!)
❌Defend a Tory wife beater
❌Fail to correct spurious accusations made by a Tory MP

6/7
I really hope there are some serious emergency meetings taking place today after the shocking day they had yesterday

But given all the high level posts are held by well known Tories and Tory donors, I won’t hold my breath

Please, please #BBC, do better for all our sakes.😢

7/7
I’m being accused of lying with this thread. As far as I can tell the issue is with the Attenborough tweet.

The Guardian report what senior BBC sources have said.

The BBC are denying that’s the reason. Although they don’t really give a reason why they couldn’t broadcast it.
I don’t know which is “the truth”. Only the BBC and those senior sources do.

It was a 5 part series with a 6th part made by the same people but not commissioned by the BBC. However the BBC acquired it and chose to put it on iPlayer.

But I hope this clarifies things.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Emma 💛💙🇩🇰🇬🇧🇪🇺

Emma 💛💙🇩🇰🇬🇧🇪🇺 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MonkEmma

Jan 5
That is quite some headline @MailOnline…..

Does the poll “predict” that Starmer will be out of No 10 within a year?

I’m sure you know the answer already, but indulge me while a do a small 🧵looking at what the poll ACTUALLY shows!

1/17 Image
Obviously there’s no link to the poll so we can only see what the DM wants to show us.

@DeltapollUK don’t have the data on their website yet.

So we’ll have to use this grainy image on the DM website (why not use a clear one? 🤔)

2/17 Image
So first up, THAT headline.

Did the poll predict Starmer would be out in less than a year?

Nope!

1/3 thought he’d be out in a year.

2/3 DID NOT

Headline ➡️ Poll predicts he’ll be out within a year

Data shows ➡️ majority of those polled don’t think that

🤯
3/17 Image
Read 17 tweets
Dec 20, 2024
Another day, another @Telegraph headline designed to get the Right OUTRAGED at all the work shy, lazy, benefits scroungers

Bah Humbug and all that😡

The article is behind a paywall, so the headline will be all most people will read

Let’s take a look behind it…

🧵1/11 Image
52.6% of people in the UK receive more in benefits than they contribute in taxes!

OMG😱

“52.6% of people are on benefits?! See, see, didn’t I always say the young/poor/woke/snowflakes were scroungers!”

👆🏼fictional Telegraph reader👆🏼🤪

Well, no. It’s not that at all!

2/11
What’s important is the definition of ‘Benefits’.

They are defined as both cash benefits AND the use of public services such as the NHS and schools!

A net contributor pays more in direct and indirect taxes than they receive in benefits and public services

3/11
Read 11 tweets
Nov 24, 2024
Nothing says legitimate organic Right Wing uprising in the UK like a meaningless petition that gets retweeted by a foreign billionaire with 200 million followers on the platform he controls.

But wait til you hear where the signatures are coming from!

🧵1/10
This petition, calling for another general election in the UK, a mere 5 months after a stonking general election victory for Labour, has been “signed” by people in 141 countries🤔

2/10
It has received 100s of signatures in 16 different countries.

It’s received 10s of signatures in a further 34 different countries.

(At the point I looked at the data)

3/10
Read 11 tweets
Nov 9, 2024
A quick lesson in the Google AI answer that pops up when you do a search.

ALWAYS click on the links to verify the answer!

A worked example for you 👍🏻

I asked: does ITV get money from TV license

AI overview: Yes, it receives money from the TV license fee

🤔
1/9 Image
So I clicked on the 🔗 icon to find out what sources led to that conclusion.

There were 3 - all good, respected, official sources.

Fab, it must be correct, then?🤷‍♀️

Thought I’d better double check what each source actually showed.

2/9 Image
The first was

It told me what I need a TV licence for - which does include watching ITV, amongst other channels.

So I went to the link at the bottom about what the licence actually funds (the question I was asking)

3/9 tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-n…Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
Nov 2, 2024
Explain this to me like I’m a child 🙏🏼

How is adding £2 to the cost of a flight going to lead to a fall of 10% in passenger numbers??

Oh wait……

Nevermind, just found a fascinating article that might shine a light on this🧐

#Ryanair

1/10

🧵 Image
About 6 weeks ago Ryanair filed disappointing Q1 and Q2 results, following a 46% drop in profits during the summer.

Ryanair blamed “frugal” consumers amid high inflation and interest rates.

So their plan?

2/10 Image
Raise ticket prices by more than 30%! 🤷‍♀️

Which is being interpreted as a means of increasing profitability rather than reducing costs.

And guess why this is particularly important to Ryanair boss O’Leary?

3/10 Image
Image
Read 11 tweets
Oct 24, 2024
It seems the British Press are losing their minds about 100 Labour ‘activists’ going to USA to help the Democrats campaign

"FOREIGN Election Interference" they shriek

Is it a real story?

Might there be any ACTUAL election interference that is a little more significant?
🧵1/26
Let’s take a look at some of the big names who have openly criticised Labour for some of their campaigners helping the Democrats.

First up we have Farage - he's very indignant about this story 👇

2/26
This wouldn't be the same Farage that, while a British MEP, said at a Trump rally:

"If I was an American citizen, I wouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton if you paid me!”

Surely not…

3/26
Read 27 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(