We ran a #simulation of a complete loss of IT infrastructure and had our participants (front line clinicians) work thru the challenges.
We observed what processes they used successfully and what proved challenging.
4/
Rather than guessing and hoping, we observed actual clinicians respond in real time - bridging the gap between work as imagined and work as done.
Then we debriefed and gained valuable perspectives from the end users.
The engagement among staff was amazing!
5/
Our emergency management team takes these insights to update our system so that should this happen IRL we’ll have a closed gaps and be better prepared.
This is just another form of #simulation-informed design.
This is key part of a learning organization.
End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In honour of upcoming St. Patrick’s Day and the luck of the Irish, here’s a post on the importance of luck in decision making.
What is luck? Well, it can be either good or bad and it’s the result of chance. By definition it's out of our control.
Here's a thread: 🧵 1/
Luck is a funny thing when it comes to decisions and our interpretation changes depending on who made the decision.
This week we saw an example of bad luck for clients of SVB. The bank run was completing out of their control.
2/
It wasn’t an unreasonable decision to have money deposited there, at least based on all available information. Its easy to criticize others for putting all their money there without diversifying (not luck but bad decison) which unreasonable...as this isn't an investment!.
3/
We tested, refined & improved the process for walk-in stroke patients using an 8 min scenario and 25min debriefing with a multidisciplinary team led by stroke NP Lee Barratt
A boardroom meeting never would've accomplished the same.
1/
We began with a pre-brief to discuss potential challenges and opportunities for improvement.
RNs, MDs, clinical assistants from ED and neurology all provided input.
Then, rather than guess whether these ideas worked, we went right to the clinical environment to test them.
2/
A simulated scenario was run within the actual emergency dept to understand how these patients would be quickly identified, a Code Stroke would be activated and key processes initiated.
Participants & observers provided feedback and perspectives during the debriefing.
3/
It may sound semantic, but it shifts priorities away from exclusively transfusion & towards a broader focus of controlling hemorrhage by:
- blood products
- normothermia
- TXA
- correct coagulopathy
- definitive hemostasis
2/
2. What criteria should be used to decide on activating MHP?
No existing scoring tool is sufficiently sensitive/specific to be the "final answer" for this question. If you're going to use a score, try the RABT score
We find it more practical to use a 2 step process...
3/
We followed the 7 Ts of the MHP (credit @ORBCoN1) 2/
1.Trigger – When to “trigger” MHP is of utmost importance yet remains challenging given the lack of accurate scoring tools. RABT likely has greatest utility but our preferred approach is a 2-tiered process depicted below (especially since most pts respond to only 1-2U)