Follow @SRuhle on the #SVBCollapse. I have a confession; I was once a client of Silicon Valley Bank and everything she says rings true. How did this happen? It takes some understanding of the culture of startups and the pressure of conformity by the boys with billions. 1/
I had never heard of SVB when I started to raise for a tech company I co-founded. In the end, we never had to raise from VCs so had little interaction with the bank, but we did think when we started that we would. We'd raise a few bucks from angel investors then go big. 2/
"Everybody uses SVB" I was told, though we were based in Boston. Raising money is horrible. For a woman, even one with a track record, it is an uncomfortable power dynamic and my age and experience helped level it some. The data is clear it is not easy for women. 3/
I have written before about the how terrific hair (Wework CEO Neumann) or a "take it or leave it" messiness (FTX CEO Bankman-Fried) became a calling card for those CEOs. I doubt Theranos' Elizabeth Holmes would have been so successful had she looked humdrum. 4/
These are all to say that the culture gets fixated on something despite all evidence that that something isn't reliable. Everybody wants in, and SVB had a similar vibe. The past experience with them was like entering a cool world of cool people with private planes. 5/
The people who fund startups were pro-SVB. It was a herd mentality and a young CEO or someone with little experience would have to be pretty confident to think the entire ecosystem was wrong and simply buck it. 6/
I say all this because the panic you are hearing from folks about SVB and the future of our economy is an echo chamber. From the perspective of crisis management, something I do know about, the FDIC has bought everybody some time and so everybody should chill. 7/
Is this a Lehman moment? I find it hard to believe. As many have pointed out, to make SVB's companies and payrolls whole isn't a heavy lift. I'd take with some skepticism folks who were libertarians last week invoking the "little people" to get relief. 8/
But mostly, like Teslas, private planes, visits to the Maldives and, sometimes, trophy wives, SVB had become the marker for a certain class of money person (guy) living in a world of similar money people (guys) and now panicked because every person (guy) around them is too. 9/
The FDIC exists to relieve that panic, and has extended payroll for the bank employees for 45 days. Panic is coming from a narrow sector of our economy. We tend to think Silicon Valley is disruptive. It is, but it also has a strong herd mentality. SVB was the herd's bank. 10/
No doubt, this will hurt VCs and those companies that were seeking to raise this year (I am on the board of one or two of them and they are assessing their own strategy, for example). But as a long term issue, I think @paulkrugman has it right. 11/11

We have time now to assess the damage, protect those who are really hurt (SVB has very few personal accounts so gov should focus on payroll for its client's employees), and not let speculation about what this means drive policy. New takes, not the herd's take, are necessary.12/12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Juliette Kayyem

Juliette Kayyem Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @juliettekayyem

Mar 9
Thread on Dominion's crisis strategy. I thought more about what it is about Dominion's approach that is successful, and ended up teaching it a little today in my crisis management course. I focused only on Dominion. FOX gets enough ink. I think D. made two smart moves. 1/
First, they did not let FOX set the conditions of engagement. To get into a dispute about whether there was any validity to FOX's claim would have conceded too much. Instead they succeeded in moving the narrative away from any discussion about whether they did something wrong. 2/
We are talking about FOX and we are talking about them not through the lens of some legal dispute but as a character attack. Pure and simple. Consider that much of the material being released isn't directly relevant to the 1st Amendment defense. Their goal is to make it hurt. 3/
Read 8 tweets
Feb 17
A story about Twitter is emerging that has significant impact on disaster relief efforts. The platform's changes to data access threaten the ability of aid workers and others to understand what is going on and drive resources to where most needed. 1/

time.com/6254500/turkey…
There has been a back and forth this week with Twitter delaying the change for a few days after a lot of pushback because of the earthquake in Turkey. Twitter had always been really good about providing access to bulk data. 2/
nature.com/articles/d4158…
This change, coupled with one I've described in this thread where changes to Twitter's algorithm make it confusing in times of emergency, result in Twitter being less useful in an arena where it was incredibly willing to be useful: the saving of lives. 3/
Read 5 tweets
Feb 3
Homeland thoughts: The balloon does not pose military or aviation threat; it is above commercial air traffic (+35K feet). There is a homeland below and one might consider that a military option isn't very smart for Americans who live there. 1/
nytimes.com/2023/02/02/us/…
The value of the intelligence China would be gaining is far less than the threat that any NORAD response would entail. There are ways to fortify critical infrastructure that might (might!) be vulnerable to the surveillance from homeland security perspective. 2/
The balloon is in US air space so it is not the same as satellite surveillance; balloons can dwell. Even if there is no surveillance benefit, there are international norms for sovereign air space. The WH calling it out is smart. Conditions could change v. military response. 3/
Read 4 tweets
Jan 5
A thread on Biden's Border Announcement. Today's changes in border policy (below) are a data and fact based approach to a truly terribly problem about regional migration. It starts with lessons from Venezuela. 1/ Image
First, though, to solve the border issue through court challenges over Title 42 is a piecemeal effort and will not change the dynamics of what is occurring, which is just a part of global migration patterns. It is not sustainable to solve migration through a public health law.2/
Second, the "Venezuela experiment" -- which is a sponsorship program where family here "vouch" for migrants and they come here lawfully, by plane, for 2 years at least -- has been a success, measured by how many Venezuelans are willing to take dangerous & illegal crossing path.3/
Read 7 tweets
Jan 5
Friday is the 2nd Anniversary of the 1/6 insurrection. While GOP House is in disarray, this is my periodic reminder that Mitch McConnell deserves a big share of blame. He condemned Trump passionately 2 years ago, but then folded; he thought Dems could fix his party for him. 1/
Did he matter? Yes. We forget how significant his condemnation of Trump was, and how deflating his eventual silence became. It took another 18 months for the #January6thCommittee to form and normalize a path forward (an off-ramping) away from Trump. 2/
theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
From the perspective of de-radicalization and the future of violent MAGAism, I generally like what I see. Events in the House are another sign that the movement is struggling to grow, Trump cannot get unity, and groups that should be aligned are now eating their own. It is stuck.
Read 4 tweets
Dec 30, 2022
Takeaways on #moscowidaho. We will not get many specifics and what led them to him; all speakers were clear that Idaho rules prohibit disclosure of anything that might look like information in an affidavit until he's in state. Based on what was said, only: 1/
1)Tremendous honesty about them STILL putting the pieces together and asking public for help about the defendant: "everything and anything." They know what they are looking for and will take it from there, so anybody who knows him is relevant. 2/
2)Since nothing has leaked about motive -- did he know them, one of them, online engagement? -- the police are still pursuing the connections. This is, of course, what people are focused on because we look for reasons why, even if they are incomprehensible. 3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(