This morning’s @NickTriggle piece for the BBC contains a number of misleading claims about the BMA’s upcoming industrial action.
First and foremost, we are not “demanding the biggest pay rise”—we’re demanding that our members’ pay be restored to what it should be.
“Firstly, no junior doctor has seen pay cut by 26%”
This deliberately conflates pay progression - increases to reflect increased skill and experience level—and cost of living increases—which is what pay awards are meant for.
Since 2008, junior doctor pay in England has been cut in real-terms (RPI) by 26.1%. No doctor is worth less than they were 15 years ago.
“The BMA defends its use of RPI”—and rightly so.
It’s not just us who use RPI; Govt does also, to increase things like rail tickets doctors need or to work out their student loan rates. It's the best measure to reflect the living costs of doctors & all working people in the UK
“A more recent start date will show a smaller decline, as would going further back in the 2000s...”
We calculate pay erosion based on when the Govt chose to start bypassing the pay review body and imposed pay freezes and caps.
It’s also unfair to conflate basic pay with so-called “extras” whilst neglecting to acknowledge such extras cover intensive hours worked at weekends and evenings.
“Doctors remain amongst highest earners” – it’s unfair to compare junior doctors against the whole of the UK. Junior doctors spend years in training generating huge student loans & face high exam and professional fees. This is why they should be paid what they are worth in 2023.
A junior doctor starting their job today would be paid just £14.09 per hour – less than someone working in a coffee shop. We’re asking this be increased to £19 per hour – where it should be had the Government not cut junior doctor pay in real-terms year-on-year.
Despite @SteveBarclay misleading claims, the cost of #PayRestoration is just £1bn or a quarter of what the Government spent on unusable PPE during the COVID pandemic.
We hope @NickTriggle will do the right thing and update this misleading article.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We welcome the proposal in today’s @IPPR report that recommends expanding the definition of residence so everyone living in the UK would be eligible for free NHS care regardless of their immigration status
The report proposes simple, workable reforms to migrant healthcare policy that would improve access to NHS services.
Implementation would be an important step towards our long-standing call for the abolition of charging regulations so the NHS is free to all at point of delivery
At the start of the pandemic we joined orgs representing healthcare professionals, refugees and migrants living in the UK in writing to Govt to make a case for free medical care for all, against the urgent backdrop of #COVID19
While we would agree that doctors should honour their commitments to already-agreed locum shifts within the limits of contractual notice periods, doctors are not required to cover long-term or known rota gaps… 1/4
Doctors already work a complex and demanding role, and are entitled to decide that an employer’s offered locum rate is not worth their additional time and effort and to seek to negotiate on it 2/4
An employer trying to cajole their staff to accept an uncompetitive rate of pay for such hours, is sending a poor message regarding how they value their staff’s time and autonomy 3/4
Our new report on medical staffing in England is out today. Nobody working in the NHS will be surprised to hear there are severe medical shortages in England. But the figures in our report show just how serious the situation is. THREAD bma.org.uk/staffing
We need more doctors. There are currently 2.8 doctors per 1,000 people in England, while the average in comparable OECD EU countries is 3.7. Not a single region in England meets this ratio.
If medical workforce growth remains at its current rate, it’ll be 2046 before the NHS has the number of practising doctors needed to raise our doctor/population ratio to 3.7.
That puts us 25 years behind our European neighbours.
We believe that the decision by the Government on easing all lockdown restrictions in England on June 21st - expected to be announced on Monday - must now be delayed.
See the evidence and what we are calling for 👇 [THREAD]
We are urging a delay of at least two weeks to the decision about easing of the lockdown restrictions.
We also want regular fortnightly reviews thereafter, which are guided by the data
As our chair of council @CNagpaul says today, we must not undo all the excellent work of the vaccine programme by prematurely relaxing all restrictions.
.@Jacob_Rees_Mogg insult about Dr David Nicholl is disgraceful. @djnicholl has courage and experience to speak the truth about the disaster of a no-deal Brexit. He should be praised not attacked
Today’s chaos will do little to reassure patients and staff about the enormous risks posed to the NHS by #Brexit. We believe leaving the EU will have a hugely damaging impact on our health service.
This uncertainty has not been addressed by Parliament and risks being pushed further down the agenda by today’s events.
As we move into the most demanding time of year for the NHS, our analysis shows that this winter is set to be the worst on record for A&E attendances, waiting times and admissions bma.org.uk/collective-voi…