And here we are with the @ActuariesInst unironically advising the government on "Climate Change" and "Rising Sea Levels" despite being a stone's throw from Fort Denison - which disproves the "Rising Sea Levels" conspiracy theory outright.
The Actuaries Institute are a typical corporate think tank with ridiculous Climate Change conspiracy policy documents but also have an unhealthy obsession with the cost of elderly care.
So it's no surprise that Karen fits in well although it is a surprise that her hatred of "anti-vaxxers" is endorsed by the @ActuariesInst who would normally keep a low profile.
The ironic thing is that, in the history of vaccines, Karen's name is significant.
No, not the Karen bit. The Cutter bit.
The #CutterIncident is a dark time in vaccine history. (But not the only one).
Due to poor manufacturing QA, over 40,000 children were INFECTED with LIVE polio from the vaccines.
There are multiple ironies in this.
The first being that the very people who blithely approved the childrens' COVID "vaccine" - which has zero proven efficacy - wrote books about it.
Paul Offit literally profited off the vaccine misery of a past generation of children
The CDC tells us how important the Cutter incident was such that lessons were learnt to make vaccines "safer than ever" after leaving 200+ children permanently paralysed and/or living in an iron lung.
This is from the CDC's "Historical Vaccine Safety Concerns" site. "The Cutter incident... led to the creation of a better system of regulating vaccines"
The very next year more Polio disasters happened - despite reassurances of the "better system".
The SV40 contamination. This is the contamination of the polio virus by a cancer-causing virus, SV40.
Of course, all these problems are over now aren't they?
Especially as Karen says so.
Karen relays what the TGA says.
Karen has no published experience or knowledge of mRNA.
If you don't agree with her she will call you an "antivaxxer".
Yet here we are today, 80 years from when the CDC said "trust us, we've cleaned up our act" - but their sister organisation the FDA approved a vaccine for children that was KNOWN to cause deaths.
In the ultimate irony, those plasmids contain promoters from the very same SV40 oncovirus (cancer causing virus) that was supposed to have been eradicated from human use in 1963.
And who found it? Not the FDA or TGA. Or the @ActuariesInst
@Kevin_McKernan found those plasmids because he took the brave decision to sequence vials of COVID mRNA "vaccine" that an anonymous(e) source had sent after we put out the call.
Our #mousearmy are not "anti-vaxxers" (which is no longer an insult btw).
We just want the truth.
Those plasmids - and whatever else is in that RNA soup - are being injected into children, young women and the elderly without a care.
And after they have been injected into the whole country, the all-cause mortality skyrockets.
It's not a mystery to us, who have been working with other PhDs, genomicists, physicians and data scientists to do the work for the last 3 years that the government Karens didn't do.
And for other professionals who think it's OK to denigrate people with slurs such as "antivaxxer"and others that I won't repeat... it's your choice to do that.
But expect to find a thread like this shining a spotlight on your hate.
Recently released Australian Road Deaths data confirm that the @epiphare study claiming that COVID vaccination reduced road deaths by 32% was, as suspected, a complete fake.
Here are the actual road deaths data plotted from the Australian BITRE data repository using a trendline for 2000-2019 (excluding 2020 as it was a quiet year)
The pink area shows the inflection and increase in road deaths over the predicted number.
Note that road deaths have a downward trend despite an increase in population (due to safety measures and slowing of traffic).
So the question becomes...
"what is the probability that - if the @epiphare study was real (showing a 32% reduction in road deaths after vaccination) - the Australian road deaths (where nearly 100% of the adult population was vaccinated) would increase by 36%"?
Debbie's tweet was about her case against @HHSGov when her son developed Type 1 Diabetes after a routine vaccine, when he had a negative glucose test prior.
So it was clearly vaccine linked, but her case was denied.
Not only was the case denied (despite clear evidence of a new diagnosis immediately after vaccination) but the case was used by the "judge" to essentially ban ANY further cases that alleged a link between new diabetes and a routine vaccine.
I'll say it again. The vaccine industry [KNOWINGLY] hijacked cell pathways that cause cancer in order to induce antibody responses so that they can claim that their product "worked" by demonstrating those antibodies - even if they offered zero protection.
To explain, when you induce an immune response you have an immune debt to pay. You can't just keep creating an immune response - or, as in the case of cancer, you will die.
A vaccine creates an artificial immune response...
Which might be fine if it was done every now and again. But what they didn't tell you was that the human body will not respond to an injected antigen alone. It will ignore it (thankfully) and the generic immune system will mop it up, no antibodies required.
Just putting this into context. @DrCatharineY was originally DOD then published on a DARPA grant. One of her few co-authors is Stephanie Petzing of the "Center for Global Health Engagement"
All one big OneHealth family to nudge you into believing this @epiphare slop is real.
For the explanation as to why these "real world data" with "data not available" publications are absolutely junk and shouldn't be accepted to any major journal please see arkmedic.info/p/pharma-hell-…
Dr Young (DARPA/DOD) is clearly now working as an ambassador to cover for the actions of the corrupt Biden regime who we are learning covered up huge amounts of adverse events from their COVID program whilst funding pharma in the "cancer moonshot"
It looks like we found our vector.
They moved from spraying live (cloned) viruses to putting them in drinking water.. which we thought wasn't possible due to chlorine.
Well, it turns out that it is, if you use a stabiliser.
The @NIH told us that they stopped funding GOFROC research but they clearly didn't.
This is a modified live virus. That is, they took a pathogenic influenza and genetically modified it and propagated it using infectious clones (reverse genetics). nature.com/articles/s4154…
"MLVs were diluted in distilled water containing Vac-Pac Plus (Best Veterinary 418 Solutions, Columbus, GA, USA) to neutralize residual chlorine and adjust the pH"