1/ I'm not sure I want the BBC to be "impartial".

I'm in favour of partiality, in particular -

*In favour of truth
*In favour of decency
*In favour of kindness
*In favour of humanity

#IStandWithGaryLineker
2/ People working in the news should have a positive duty to point out lies; but where the lies come from ministers or other government representatives, the BBC has an extremely poor record at calling them out.
3/ I want people to be able to discuss important issues without being told to get back in their box, or keep their opinions to themselves.
4/ I do not see why intelligent and thoughtful people should be prohibited - outside the workplace - from expressing views that differ from their employer's line.

That's particularly important when discussing news and current affairs.
5/ Of course, when BBC employees are at work, expressing views on air, they should say only what their contract permits.
6/ But why should BBC employees - even if they work in news and current affairs (let alone in other areas) - not be able to express their personal views on their personal (not official BBC) twitter feeds?
7/ And - just as importantly - why should experts not be permitted to express their expert views in public?

I worked in public health, for example.
8/ Those of us employed by Public Health England were banned from discussing things like NHS Health Checks in public - other than to support them, as they were (politically imposed) policy.

But within the profession they are highly controversial.
9/ My twitter circle included other professions with relevant expertise, including GPs and other experts in primary care, and public health experts employed in other organisations, who could contribute to constructive debate.
10/ When PHE was formed and took over responsibility for them, I asked about the evidence base for NHS health checks, and linked to a recent Cochrane review which said they were not cost-effective.

I was told I had crossed a line…
11/ If experts employed in public service are only permitted to debate important matters in secret, that does us all a disservice.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter English #FBPE

Peter English #FBPE Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @petermbenglish

Dec 14, 2022
1/ Of course, voter fraud is potentially an issue. But, in the UK at least, it seems to be a very small problem.

The tories have proposed a solution which is a sledgehammer to crack a nut, and will be far worse than the current situation.
theconversation.com/six-reasons-br…
2/ Sadly, @UKLabour appear not to oppose the bill.

Many of us will remember the immense problems there were with some recent votes - particularly, for example, for EU citizens who were entitled to vote prior to Brexit.
3/ Some of these problems might even have been reduced with some form of ID documentation.
Read 14 tweets
Sep 16, 2022
Thread by @alexhallhall on Thread Reader App threadreaderapp.com/thread/1570407…

The Queen's death has led me to a far more republican position than I held previously.

1/9
I have always been aware that selecting a head of state the way we do it in the UK - and remember, the Queen believed that God had appointed her - is bizarre.

2/9
But I also felt - and probably not just because of her good PR - that the Queen did a good job.

And the US system could hardly be worse.

So I was content not to worry too much about our superstitious (appointed by God?) monarchic system.

3/9
Read 10 tweets
Aug 3, 2022
1/ I have been married for 35 years, and my wife, Doro (@Fifino9) died this morning.

Long, raw thread…

In 2010, Doro found a lump in her breast. Lumpectomy, chemo, radiotherapy, hormone treatments (and consequent spotting and endometrial cancer scare) followed.
2/ At about the time of the original diagnosis, Public Health England blighted our lives, falsely blaming me for errors over the Godstone Farm E coli outbreak, damaging my reputation, and putting my career on hold for five years, for more senior people's mistakes.
3/ In 2019 Doro had some abdominal pain. She'd been discharged from the cancer hospital and the "contact us if you need us" service assured us that, this long after the treatment, it was highly unlikely to be related to the cancer diagnosis. A gastroscopy showed no pathology.
Read 62 tweets
May 30, 2022
1/ I am a recently retired consultant in communicable disease control (CCDC). Since I've retired, I don't see the internal briefings sent around by UKHSA.

I am not an expert on Monkeypox.
2/ (If you listen to @BunkerPod podcast player.fm/1BQFsru you may have heard Dr Hammer @cc_martell recently - she is an expert on the virus.
3/ And most of the expertise in monkeypox is in the countries where it is prevalent - see eg this from Nigeria ncdc.gov.ng/news/367/publi… .)
Read 33 tweets
May 8, 2022
1/ Short 🧵 on #Beergate.

It's something of a cliché that many news organisations, asked if it's raining, will ask "experts" to come and give opposing opinions, when a proper journalist would open the window.
2/ Throughout #Beergate, many news organisations are piling in, speculating about the potential consequences for Labour/Starner. Generating enough hot air to ward off the energy problems for weeks.
3/ Yet, only on Twitter, have I seen people who understand what the rules were at the relevant points in time, and looked to see whether Starmer/Labour and Johnson/Conservatives were compliant with the rules applicable at the time.
Read 6 tweets
May 7, 2022
1/ "Investigation continues into mysterious rise in cases of hepatitis in children"

Adenovirus is common and often trivial or asymptomatic.

You would expect a proportion ("E") of children in any random sample to test positive for it.

f7td5.app.goo.gl/Rqsjia
2/ What proportion of the children with hepatitis are observed ("O") to test positive?

Unless O/E>1, there's no reason to suspect an association, let alone a causal association.
OK, I've now skimmed through the UKHSA report assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl… and read this short BMJ article emails.bmj.com/c/1sxiFtzLvaNw…

I cannot find any mention of the how or whether the rate of adenovirus found in the children with hepatitis differs from the background rate.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(