A 🧵on #Australian government's #COVID19 Vaccine Claims Scheme which has been made available to #Australian's if there are side effects, adverse events and/or Serious and life-threatening side effects (rare) from "safe and Effective" #COVID19 vaccines.
An article by Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) published an year ago highlighted that more than 10,000 Australians (at least) are planning to claim under the Serious and life-threatening side effects.
2. Harm covered under this scheme - please see attached.
The evidence of clinical condition/injury suffered is supported with a medical Dr. or hospital physician with the treating doctor’s opinion on the diagnosed condition or injury and likely link to vaccination.
3. Proof of losses suffered is provided.
I wonder what and how a price can be put on pain and suffering one has to go through (perhaps for life) due to a medical intervention that they had to go through (coerced via mandates) that they didn't want to.
Claims can be made where the #COVID19 vaccine recipient has died and this document also mentions the categories (Tiers) it has been distributed across.
- Claims received up to 9 Nov 2022 - 3071
- Claims approved - 75
- Total scheme payout - Over $3.8 million (AUD)
- Claims deemed not payable - 188
- Review request - 25
- Active claims - 2642
When I look at these numbers:- 1. I see a failed product 2. I see a dangerous product 3. I see a product that should have never been forced on people (Vaccine mandates) 4. I see avoidable injuries and deaths. 5. I see that our regulators and Health agency have failed us.
Every State premier who enforced Vaccine mandates, bureaucrats who drew up the policies, so-called expert(s) who claimed that these #COVID19 vaccines are "safe" and "effective" and Media talking heads who promoted these products should foot the bill, not the Australian taxpayers.
Australian taxpayers are facing a mighty hefty bill
of a failed product which provides no benefit and on the contrary is not "safe" & "effective".
Mainstream Science™ folks should have listened to Medical Drs. instead of censoring them for sharing who their concerns.
Dept. of Health Australia has updated their Guidance on Myocarditis and Pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccines on 12 January 2024.
Here are some interesting points 👇🏽
#Australia
#CovidVaccines
In the guidance published on 9 Nov 2022, they said that a small number of cases of have been reported in the clinical trial and in Australia. Now, they are saying that Myocarditis and/or pericarditis can occur after Novavax at a similar rate to the mRNA vaccine.
Myocarditis - 4 in every 100K doses.
Pericarditis - 13 in every 100K doses.
The Office of Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR), which is part of Dept. of health #Australia is crying 'misinformation' because .@SenatorRennick & .@Jikkyleaks called them out on their BS on mRNA vaccines and 'transfection'.
Those who are not aware, please refer to this iconic thread shared by .@Jikkyleaks where .@SenatorRennick questioned Dr Raj Bhula who is the current Regulator (OGTR) and has over 20 years’ experience in the regulation of pesticides in Australia.
Their statement reads:
'transfect' - It 'may' also mean ‘enter into the cell’s
nucleus to stably integrate in the genome’. This is a meaning that DOES NOT apply to the two mRNA vaccine.
How can they say it, as @Jikkyleaks pointed out so rightly 👇🏽
The notes from the Australian senate committee supplementary budget estimates 2021- 2022 on #Ivermectin are stunning.
A 🧵
#Ivermectin
#Australia
One of the key reason to restrict prescribing #Ivermectin was that people would have taken ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19 infection rather than getting vaccinated.
#Australia
Did you know that the decision to restrict prescribing of #ivermectin was not open to public consultation.
The risk they are highlighting which is spreading of COVID-19 in the community.
Please note that that COVID-19 vaccine never prevented transmission.
In late 2022, as part of the process of should the restriction on #Ivermectin be lifted in Australia, The NSW Poisons Information centre (NSW PIC) in their submission to the TGA advised that they were not in favor.
#Ivermectin
#Australia
This is because since restriction was applied, they had 35 calls regarding exposures to ivermectin which was being inappropriately used for Covid treatment or prevention.
#Ivermectin
#Australia
How the use of vet products indicated the restrictions (of ivermectin) in prescribing working?
The restriction forced people to obtain #Ivermectin illegally or to use ivermectin manufactured for animals. The prohibition produced the opposite desired impact.
In Jan 2021, when TGA "Provisionally" approved ASTRAZENECA COVID-19 vaccine, they knew the following:-
1. Bio-distribution study was pending. 2. Vaccine long term immunity was a concern & not assessed. 3. Booster didn't provide better protection. https://t.co/DEKZ6Uusuqtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
4. Did you know there were concerns for Anti-ChAd vector antibodies due to repeat vaccination?
On 9 Feb 2022, TGA #Australia provisionally approved AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine as booster dose.
6. This report was authorized on 28 Jan 2021.
They knew that Antibodies generally declined quickly over 2 weeks after the booster dose and yet on 9 Feb 2022 (an year later), TGA "provisionally" approved AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine as booster dose.
This email exchange from January 2021 b/w Prof. Allen Cheng (ATAGI Voting member) and Prof. Paul Kelly (Australia Chief Medical Officer) is intriguing.
“Why would we use a vaccine that mightn't prevent transmission?"
🤡👉🏽🌏
I am quite not sure what "herd immunity" Prof. Cheng is talking about with COVID-19 vaccines as these vaccines do no prevent one from contracting it and does not prevent trasmission.
#Australia
Professor Paul Kelly's responded advising to add - "This is not the end of the vaccine story, it’s the beginning. We don’t know how long protection will last for any of the vaccine candidates, so we may need to revaccinate"