“Scanning” is the new buzz word in ⚽️
This has perpetuated a plethora of drills where players have to “check their shoulder” whilst passing in a prescribed sequence (back and forth, or a-b-c).
Here is a short thread explaining why this doesn’t work IMO 👇
Why are they scanning?
The concept of scanning is to pick up information in order to act a effectively. Therefore, there needs to be a reason why I am scanning, the best and most transferable to the game reason is an opponent
Scan b/c coach said to
This is problematic (see 👆) b/c players are now NOT scanning for useful information, they are doing it b/c you told them to. Repetitively checking shoulder in a prescribed drill does not help attune the player to relevant info - e.g. position of opponent
Scan and name color of cones 🤦🏻
Very popular at the moment. However, that is also not the information/droids 😁 you are looking for. Does it transfer to the game? Unlikely. Why not use the movement of a passive opp? Way more authentic and higher probability of transfer to game.
Scanning is not separate
It shows the importance of perception-action coupling, I scan to perceive opportunities to act.
Therefore we must teach it in context - i.e. with relevance to the actions of an opponent.
So how do I teach scanning?
Create practice activities that require/encourage it usually with a passive or 100% opponent
There are lots of activities where they are scanning and acting based on the random movement of opponent. Avoid prescribing one way to do it, its not the game.
E.g.
receive pass, play back
Scan for def behind who chooses a target player (to block passing lane)
Receive 3rd pass and turn/pass based on info you picked up from scan
Can add a 3rd def option, pressing the central receiver, which they should simply play the ball back.
Example 2
I play over the river groups 4s or 5s, where two of the receiving team must be in the river with 2 defenders (penetration preventers!) to play through the river.
This creates a 4v2, 2v2 in river and 2 receivers. Once played through 2 Att in river join their team
Incentivize scoring
1pt for ball through river
3pts for connecting through Att players in river.
First team with 10pts against has to do a forfeit
I hope this helps! 👍🏻 1. Stop holding cones up for players to name 2. Stop making players check shoulder for no reason 3. Stop prescribing repetitive single solutions #soccer#coaching#scanning
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Interesting take on coaching from a cognitive psychology perspective. But I would like to offer an alternate view from a different skill acquisition perspective. 🧵
First of all I think for a relatively new manager Kompany is doing a fantastic job at Burnley (keeping my @SheffieldUnited at bay!). He has clearly mastered a key component of coaching - developing and maintaining relationships - hence buy in.
1. Knowledge(K) of v Knowledge about
A lot of the info given is related to K-about. This can be useful, but the K used to control actions is knowledge of - so the def needs to develop that through repetition (w/o repetition) and exposure to those situations.
What have I learned from soccer practice over the past few weeks? A 🧵
CONTEXT
Group is a trap team - middle school girls in HS age group of mixed ability (3 levels). Most played for min 3-4 years.
Practice 3xpw 90mins
TECHNICAL DRILLS DON’T WORK
Players said they have done a lot of technical passing A-B-C in the past (2-3 years), but many do not have technical proficiency.
This alludes to decomposed technical skill practice isn’t effective AND doesn’t transfer well.
UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLES IN SOCCER - A 🧵 on why they need to be taught at ALL levels.
Universal principles are consistent across all levels of performance from u8 to Pro. They are just introduced and implemented in different ways. These are:
Task Goal
Intentions
Space
Relationships
Transition
GOAL OF SOCCER
ATT - score goals.
DEF - stop opponent from scoring goals.
Simple. How this is done depends, there is not one “correct” way. Performance level, developmental level of participants, style of play or game model etc all influence this.
After some good feedback and interactions on my coaching thread, I wanted to have a deeper dive into some of the ideas. Join in, add your Q’s and thoughts, LET’S GO!
#1 - METHODS ARE DRIVEN BY YOUR BELIEFS AND ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT SKILL LEARNING
RATIONALE
We all have rationale for how we coach, BUT, therein lies the problem, what is that rationale?
Whether openly articulated or not, you do what you do based on your beliefs about learning. We are just trying to find out what they are and the implications for coaching.
WHY IS A THEORETICAL RATIONALE IMPORTANT?
It provides an overall framework for your methods (activity design and instruction), so you are consistent and evidence-based in your approach to skill acquisition.
This emphasizes the power your beliefs have on your chosen methods.
THOUGHTS ON COACHING -
a thread 🧵
Having participated in several 140 character back and forths with coaches, I thought I would post my thoughts on coaching, skill and learning, to get a conversation going, so here goes!
METHODS ARE DRIVEN BY YOUR BELIEFS AND ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT SKILL LEARNING
Therefore, understanding how people learn and perform movement skills is the foundation to your coaching and should be thoroughly explored. Basing your activities/drills on faulty beliefs is a problem.
SKILL IS EMBODIED AND EMBEDDED
Skill is unique to each individual’s organismic constraints (embodied).
Skill is embedded in the performance environment.
Therefore, performers must be afforded the opportunity to explore their own way to solve the movement problem.