Back at the NC Supreme Court today for round 2 of do-overs. Yesterday was gerrymandering; today is voter ID
The previous Democratic-majority ruled both unconstitutional last year but Republicans flipped the court in the midterm elections and are rehearing both cases #ncpol#ncga
Last year wasn’t the first time voter ID was ruled unconstitutional for intentional racial discrimination
GOP lawmakers said they addressed racial targeting issues in the new version—but Supreme Court ignored that/didn’t give them a fair hearing wral.com/nc-supreme-cou…#ncpol
Should note that, unlike yesterday, normal public access to the court is back. Doors were unlocked and they’re no longer telling people they have to be on a list to attend the hearing
On a related note, no protesters outside today #ncpol
The kind of voter fraud that voter ID would stop is basically nonexistent—1 case in 2016 out of millions of votes
The bigger question is if the real intent of voter ID is to harm Black voters. Supreme Court struck it down last year, but hearing today could reinstate it for 2024
That 2016 case was a woman who impersonated her dead mother, “a tremendous Donald Trump fan,” to cast an illegal vote for Trump. She admitted to it, but the local prosecutor declined to charge her
Here in court today, GOP lawyer says a few Black lawmakers voted for voter ID—so it can’t be racist.
That’s a hurdle the challengers tried to pass at trial, with an academic who testified that even Black people can act with “white rage.” I covered it here newsobserver.com/news/politics-…
Good morning from the NC Supreme Court, where security is tighter than I’ve ever seen, for today’s re-do on partisan gerrymandering.
The normal public access to the court is gone—even the main doors in are locked, and they’re vetting who can go inside the courtroom itself #ncpol
For context there are a couple hundred protesters directly across the street who are very vocal about their displeasure with the court’s decision to redo this case (plus voter ID and the Leandro education funding case) #ncpol
Heading to #ncpol Supreme Court soon for redistricting. Republican lawmakers lost last year: Majority-Democrat court ruled partisan gerrymandering unconstitutional.
Then GOP voters flipped the court back in November. New majority decided to re-do the case wral.com/nc-supreme-cou…
Although it's what most people expect, we don't know for sure yet that the justices will gut North Carolina's anti-gerrymandering precedent.
In the rare instances the court has reheard cases, it often keeps the same ruling (but with a rewritten opinion to add new references etc)
When it comes to redistricting, judicial politics is no-holds-barred in #ncpol
DC-based groups focused explicitly on gerrymandering (both pro and con) have spent tens of millions of dollars in recent years trying to get their preferred judges on the bench here.
Most campaign kickoff videos are pure fluff about the candidate. They rarely attack opponents, let alone show clips of them.
Stein takes a much more aggressive approach here--especially since Robinson hasn't formally announced yet (although he has said he's considering) #ncpol
Stein doesn't address this aspect of a potential matchup in the ad. But he's Jewish, and Robinson has publicly endorsed anti-Semitic tropes and conspiracy theories over the years, including during his 2020 campaign. #ncpol
In a rare move, the group of all 50 states' Supreme Court chief justices wrote to SCOTUS, urging them to shoot down the argument NC Republican lawmakers are making--that there should be no checks and balances for election laws--in their "Independent State Legislature" case #ncpol
The brief is careful to say it doesn't support either party. But its first sentence (left photo) directly opposes the argument NC lawmakers made (right photo) about whether or not courts should be allowed to rule on redistricting maps, etc.
Here's my story from when SCOTUS agreed to take up the NC case in time for the 2024 elections, and what it could mean for the entire country: newsobserver.com/news/politics-…#ncpol
Odd ruling by the NC Court of Appeals today: A 3-judge panel let an "alienation of affection" lawsuit move forward...but all 3 judges wrote separately, two of whom argued over whether the law is constitutional (an issue the lawsuit itself doesn't appear to have raised) #ncpol
Alienation of affection is the fancy legal term for "being a homewrecker." If your spouse has an affair and you get divorced, that law lets you sue the person they slept with.
The basis for the law is that women used to be legally considered the property of their husbands, like slaves or horses.
The modern-day question is whether the law is still unacceptably misogynistic, or if the fact that both sexes can now files these lawsuits makes them OK
New: @NCDemParty wants a criminal investigation into AG Josh Stein's 2020 opponent, Jim O'Neill, since yesterday a judge greenlit an investigation of Stein's campaign
They say the Stein action is unconstitutional--but if it's happening, O'Neill should be investigated too. #ncpol
And the story from when Stein sued Wake County DA Lorrin Freeman and the NC Elections Board last month, trying to get the law thrown out as unconstitutional (and, in the process, revealing the then-secret criminal investigation into his campaign): newsobserver.com/news/politics-…#ncpol