Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
SheLooksItUp:AbsolutelyUncommnAnalysis~DVFamCourts Profile picture
@LetUsGetHonest
Mar 15, 2023 • 24 tweets • 17 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
These tags & last thread of interest not just to #familyCourtReform people or #DVsurvivors but also as earlier today, re: #JeffSkoll #eBay #SVCF #SVB (banks & big tech VCS) #MegWhitman #Omidyar (Who owns/runs major media & tech platform issues), Immediately prev thread contxt
2/
 My 2018 Exposes, HowTo, Drilldowns etc. We s/n be afraid to tangle with big-bucks Forms990 (I did Tides & SFVC AND their supporting/related orgs).
wp.me/psBXH-982
wp.me/psBXH-99m
wp.me/psBXH-95X. Usually I include internal links to related topics too.
3/
 Just now I am again in housing transition (a.k.a. Homeless) as I was in 2018, but at least not in California. #FiduciaryAbuse directly involved which I have to face & handle, while in this condition. Yes, it’s intimidating, as intended to be. It’s a control tactic.
4/
 I think I mis-use the word “tag” on here. I’m not talking tagging photos or attachmts but simply addressing to diff’t people in the body of the tweet. Next tweet lists a bunch of (they may think) UNrelated people, but my blog shows the intersections. Then I’ll do the images.
5/
 @ex_silicon @stkirsch @mlm72760 @AndrewCicchett1 @Inspectorforyou @mikevolpe @grantwyeth @katerowswell @FitzPlanet (RT as appropriate) @reveal @Participant @KaporCenter (generally, journalists who’ve taken on subject matter #FamilyCourts #DV, #BatteredMothersCustodyConference
6/
 From one of those three blog posts from about 4.5 years ago. NB: My “Donate” button (it doesn’t link to a nonprofit, just me ℅ PayPal account) any amounts (PayPal takes a small% so over $10 would help) deeply appreciated. I do want to publish.. Image
7/
 (wp.me/psBXH-982
wp.me/psBXH-99m
wp.me/psBXH-95X. Usually I include internal links to related topics too.) Image
8/
 (My voice, my point of view about the same, some entities have changed their names and rebranded, and some databases too…) Image
9/
 All images come from published WordPress posts, ALL are designed to click and zoom (it’s just me talking, most of the time, complete sentences and thoughts with uploaded media in a level of detail I know I can’t keep dedicating that much time to now. FYI I’m a senior…)… Image
10/
wp.me/psBXH-982
wp.me/psBXH-99m
wp.me/psBXH-95X. (One-up images, cont’d. Screenshots may have some markings but most don’t). This one features some people who HAVE followed financials impacting #FamilyCourts & NOT done the cover-up routine. Image
11/ Image
12/
 If you’re not an “image reader” it might actually be easier just to read the posts. I have the short-links above. Post titles also informative. I know images (vs. interactive media) less effective, but that’s what I have available presently. Image
13/
wp.me/psBXH-982
wp.me/psBXH-99m
wp.me/psBXH-95X
#SeeMyBlog (these are Aug. 2018) DETAILED Drill-downs in both example and talking about how & why I did them. TidesFoundations, SiliconValleyFoundation in particular.
I feature certain terms ℅ #IRS.. Image
14/
 Which I think should be in more common usage on-line when talking about (ANY) cause. There are some transferable terms of course to other countries, but not 100% and when going the “Functionalist” “Global” #UN_SDGs #UNSDGs which the millionaire/billionaires love to talk, Image
15/
 more than about their own total controlled income-producing assets and where they’re held (while funding nonprofits AND universities public & private prone to running #BehavioralModification RCTs (controlled trials on “what works’) on the masses #BIPs #BatterersIntervention Image
16/
 Emphasize motive and associations more than the level of private wealth which, proportionately (being so much of it tax-exempt) DOES in fact harm us when it clouds, obfuscates and confuses cause-based sales & marketing with public accountability. I’ve noticed a move away from
17/
 … operating primarily or only tax-exempt into claiming it’s OK — just fine — to do this the #HarvardBainBridgespan way, that is — (It’s a tag on the blog), coach, coach, mentor, replicate, and control the conversations, keep it OFF collectively controlled wealth.
18/Next few images (from wp.me/psBXH-95x? .. Guess that was supposed to be a capital “X” but this post also meant to find (why: #CreditSuisse shares (no, I have none) I heard, @FT today, dropped after SaudiNationalBank (owns 10%) said “no more.”
19/
 The last 3 characters are case-sensitive as you can see:
Also I THINK my own post had the wrong short-link !. Look (Archive calendar widget works) for July 31, 2018, and this title:
That’s a good post (many sections); I will return to correct that 3rd of 3 shown above later Image
20/
 This part refs something pitched to the C.I.R. (Dba REVEAL)…& a smaller nonprofit & LLC featured by #CenterForJudicialExcellence (KathleenRussell) back then. Image
21/ Image
22/
 Finally. Also, note: the Calif. Business Search database bizonline.sos.ca.gov NO LONGER gives this level of clarity for the same search process as I got in 2018, I’d asked them once why, said it was “in transition” but for how long?
All key info (except the pdf content Image
23/
 Is clear and easy to read, i.e., font large enough, not too much clutter. That was just 2nd level of detail on a basic info search. 3rd level was to (individually) click on any (ideally all) pdfs. Now, the 2nd (actually, it’s a 3rd, after clicking on “history”) shows less.
24/
 If you are in Calif, have used this database to LOOK (not just file or incorporate) & have feedback, please let me know. I don’t feel comfortable w/ level of privacy I still need personally to write them officially about it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with SheLooksItUp:AbsolutelyUncommnAnalysis~DVFamCourts

SheLooksItUp:AbsolutelyUncommnAnalysis~DVFamCourts Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LetUsGetHonest

SheLooksItUp:AbsolutelyUncommnAnalysis~DVFamCourts Profile picture
Jul 3
1/Why does it always seem so complicated to put out a basic thread (context for one or two main points only?). DNK, but I really don't like context-less writing, and don't think it's fair to produce a lot of it.

Looking for something (else) on my blog today, I discovered two posts on the trademarking & proliferation of things #HighConflict #High_Conflict, a decade apart, and a third one explaining why I wrote the other one. In 2022 and 2012. Now it's 2024, and some of the same operators and career track/conference track/ FixTheCourts track influences are still doing their thing. (Links at the bottom of this post).

Note: 2022 was the year of "#KaydensLaw" #VAWA reauthorization, and out JUST in time to promote it, the non-entity first called National Safe Parents Coalition (so I used acronym "NSPC" and did drill-downs), but it quickly altered the last noun to "Organization" making my acronym irrelevant. While later (not much later!) blocking me on "X" (@safe_parents) as did some of the individual members, especially after I did the drilldowns/lookups, as is my habit) (@custodypeace and so forth).

So I had a lot to say (until went homeless again...) in 2022. I had to refer at times to posts written in 2019 as the #ArguingPAS debate was taken international/global IN ORDER TO (I say) conceal the domestic (for me, that means "USA") structural hypocrisy and conflicts built into the whole FamilyCourt system, itself a creation of only the late 1990s, but set up in the late 1960s.

Hey, I'm just a DV and FC survivor now dealing with fiduciary abuse (resulting in homelessness, joblessness, and no contact with immediate family members -- some of them are just plain dangerous, others have been, guess what: "Alienated").

The #PRWORA "Right to work" regime eradicated much of our ability to work by removing the protection from violent partners then forcing us into frequent and ongoing dealings with them around the Family Courts (Behavioral Modification Labs and Public/Private ATMS) .. Talk about "disenfranchised" and income stratification....

(#WelfareDeform USA and earlier no-fault divorce est in place to divert cases into civil from the criminal (remove "Cause" as a basis for divorce) and all that, like late 1960s.

Promote massive adoption and continue stigmatizing through media messaging (that's the #HMRF part) single mothers.. Pay nonprofit executives a LOT to stay on that bandwagon. Etc.... But keep up the pretense of concern for violence against women. Federal/State (USA) dichotomies...

The answers really do lie in the financing. It's hard to stomach/face the level of betrayal and censorship involved in the helping area. SOme real help does occur, of course, but once you start looking into the details of the business filings and noncompliant nonprofits that continue being rewarded for NOT complying -- It's a different world, and definitely different perspective!

March 2012:
March 2022
(Watch the case-sensitivity), the second one led to one,
March, 2022 , "Four Reasons Why I wrote "High-Conflict on Steroids."wp.me/psBXH-14I
wp.me/psBXH-dEA
wp.me/psBXN-e1zImage
2/
 (Again): March 2012:
March 2022
(Watch the case-sensitivity), the second one led to one,
March, 2022 , "Four Reasons Why I wrote "High-Conflict on Steroids."

Still relevant, quid-pro-quo internat'l collegial relationships (esp. as shown through journals) bear fruit.

For example, If you noticed @PADVint (June, 2024 conference) to take the "Let's not talk about economic infrastructure or the role of networked nonprofits, such as #AFCC #NCJFCJ + the privatized but federally funded #DVOrgs thing global.

I have all along been giving background of participants and certain journal articles.

I've done this both housed and unhoused (no long-term lease, sometimes have to move three times in one week. I did just last week...)

This writing is still relevant. I've seen far off quid-pro-quo internat'l collegial relationships (esp. as shown through journals) bear fruit. Following entities more than personalities does this; talking infrastructure and public/private interfaces (in funding and who owns/runs what terms) as they constantly evolve, provids some advance alert.

If you noticed @PADVint (June, 2024 conference) to take the "Let's not talk about economic infrastructure or the role of networked nonprofits, such as _____" thing global..

Two images are from the 2012 blog post, Look at the use of High Conflict (one key to marketing is repetition right?).

May be entertaining, especially to see it in their own words. On the right, just a short quote, I saw "High Conflict" used nine times in just one promo.

On another entire blog I had a post on Connecticut's High-Conflict Court Docket. (That home page display, a lot of purple, 3rd image here):wp.me/psBXH-14I
wp.me/psBXH-dEA
wp.me/psBXN-e1zImage
Image
Image
3/ "...But for now I just wanted to post, as I've been scrolling through both of those Show-and-Tell exposes, this part:

#SocialWelfare_FamilyLaw (UK focused journal: compare to #LawAndSociety_org) @law_soc (I THINK that's ).

[QUOTING/See Attached: From
I want you to see the journal in question:

"The manipulation isn’t easy to see unless you’ve developed and maintained the habit of following the entities, professional personalities, and branding permutations with some basic awareness of where each one (historically) is coming from and heading towards.
_____________________________________
"📌Introduction to the Special Issue, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Volume 42, No. 1, by Elizabeth Sheehy & #SimonLapierrePhD (2020)

"Journal Aim and Scope

"The Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law presents research and analysis of social welfare, family law and policy issues ✅from a UK, European and international perspective. 

"The Journal provides an ✅interdisciplinary forum to which 📌academics and professionals working in the fields of 📌social welfare and family law can turn to for information, comment and informed debate."

Of course it does. Let's keep that #ArguingPAS (Ignoring the Financials, etc.) going. Notice "Academics and Professionals" (in the field). IF You're going to run RCT social engineering programs large-scale and long-term, SOMEONE has to get in there and keep the human material to be discussed academically flowing. That would be distressed children vulnerable families angry Moms, angry Dads, almost anything within the scope of a human life span, and how to better manage it... [no apologies for the sarcasm...]

You need a constant flow of lab rats. Exposing the origins and blueprints of the #FamilyCourts USA or UK as having little to NOTHING to do with "Keeping Children Safe" would make FIXING those courts obsolete as a profession. Wouldn't it!!

Meanwhile Taylor & Francis Informa UK, at least when this was published).. gets the income and retains its disclaimers (shown below)

This thread wasn't carefully prepared (you noticed, eh? I put out an APB to expect it this season), but I mostly wanted to get the next screenshot and its attachment out. ... For now//LGH:LawAndSociety.org
wp.me/psBXH_dEAImage
Read 7 tweets
SheLooksItUp:AbsolutelyUncommnAnalysis~DVFamCourts Profile picture
Oct 19, 2023
Resolutions:

1. Shorter sentences. ALL the time, unless I’m on a sarcastic rant. (IT’ll pass). Just finished reading through one or my own posts which I’d reposted in pieces. It was readable, BUT, not enough short sentences. I do have some short mottos.

It’s a challenge, because I also think in long sentences, then feel I have to explain/define/qualify all sorts of situations, are that so many basic definitions just aren’t commonplace.
Resolutions 2:

. (“Justice Innovations, Inc.”)
I communicated privately re: this and pulled up a number of earlier blog posts on the PROJECT which is now a “PERSON”

Publicize the switch from Public/Private Project with nearly 800 [752] workers and staff in about 31? Sites in NYC, to, somehow, and almost overnight, a single nonprofit (operating under a dba) which had NO revenues to report in its first year of operation, and hasn’t (at least on the IRS) displayed a single full-sized IRS tax return.

And the website is insulting oversimplified, especially to anyone familiar with the previous scope of operations and complexity of the same.

What are all the websites previously referring to “Center for COurt Innovation” going to do — because its intentional scope (as the PROJECT before it became a PERSON (in the form of a nonprofit corporation) — have all the webmasters edit the labels to the link? I mean, the closed-down project can do some website redirects (and I see have already), but the link labels are now all outdated.

Kind of like the question: Are all those little twitter icons which used to lead to “Twitter” but now go to X going to be updated? Think about how many there would be.

(First two screenshots just show how the topic came up again; third is its “ABOUT” page (not the pretty colors and graphics — maybe we’ll forget ALL about that this might be a corporation, a tax-exempt one, which has some assets, revenues, probably employees, and an agenda…. MAYBE we’ll forget how the same name used to refer to a major (major, major MAJOR) operation out of NYC (which I’d seen propagating ideas on how to respond to DV, what kinds of courts to create, HOW people were flown in or out to figure out how to set up new courts in THEIR state (or country) and so forth. Keywords: #FordFndtn. Fund for the City of New York. Etc.

Obviously 4 images isn’t the whole story. I just want to tell this story, in brief, if possible, soon.InnovatingJustice.orgImage
Image
Image
Image
(“Not the pretty…” should be “Note the pretty…” — it’s late. I missed a letter…)
Read 4 tweets
SheLooksItUp:AbsolutelyUncommnAnalysis~DVFamCourts Profile picture
Aug 7, 2023
Not looking at this whole thread right now, but responding to this piece if it, last para.:

FamilyCourts are operations of either a Superior Court, or in many states, a Family Court division or domestic relations division, so they are not their own entities .

The superior… https://t.co/AqHwRLHCz3twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
2/
& you need to see how they were set up, who set them up & what that financial motivation was… and Getting it right not just speculating

which means a lot of quoting government sources— and we need to look at how the USA handles its tax receipts and talks to its citizens.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
3/
Throughout my blogging and reading, and that’s over a span of now 13 years, the evidence of constant undermining of jurisdiction within this country between the federal and the states, has been a constant.

This is essentially an attack on the US Constitution, and to the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Read 4 tweets
SheLooksItUp:AbsolutelyUncommnAnalysis~DVFamCourts Profile picture
Jul 24, 2023
1/
 Publ. Sept2017, my voice & work.

An older but still relevant post. Also if you’ve heard of or run across #ArabellaAdvisors, #NewVentureFund, EricKessler, #ActBlue entities (there are several), CEL (CitizenEducationLab, 501(c)3 & 501(c)4 out of… https://t.co/MBEGWgDDGX https://t.co/7vLxC5kY1Uwp.me/psBXH-7zh
twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Image
2/ of 10?
Publ. Sept2017, my voice & work, For Your Info. The image is the “window frame” which prompted the post.

“You may not think, judging by this blog, I watch the current news — but. Do, and doing so, I know what I’m saying here is important. You… https://t.co/gZ161i6KvR https://t.co/zMNfVGRL6wwp.me/psBXH-7zh
twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Image
3/ of 10?
Publ. Sept2017, my voice & work, For Your Info.

(These are just the tags for that post…) Notice: “how many fiscal agents does it take to solve a problem or (not) set up a nonprofit?”

“Keep your eyes on the assets” — Remember to do the… https://t.co/Z2MqQeM4DW https://t.co/JBRD1vJvUawp.me/psBXH-7zh
twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Image
Read 12 tweets
SheLooksItUp:AbsolutelyUncommnAnalysis~DVFamCourts Profile picture
May 15, 2023
Y’all are witnesses how fast this happens:

Anyone who I haven’t blocked (and I rarely block anyone) can now see how little time, and how easy, it is to get “blocked,” and on what “claimed” basis. You can also see the group dynamic.

While @clerotto (whose account I hadn’t even… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… ImageImage
2/
This is outrageous, how academics respond to criticism or even information not run by them for collaborative-enough tone, and then try to convince other (I’m one) DV survivor, or FamilyCourtGauntlet individuals they care about us — so if you don’t agree, just Shut Up,please?… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… Image
3/
 Dr Hussein never even responded to me. She obviously doesn’t want my input.

Clare Lavery (@clerotto) kept me on the defensive with a (probably intentional) re-direct, as if I was somehow writing about her, or unfair to put her in the middle. (I’ve seen this tactic before)… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… ImageImage
Read 7 tweets
SheLooksItUp:AbsolutelyUncommnAnalysis~DVFamCourts Profile picture
May 15, 2023
So, re: TheConversation.com, and its tax return,
2/
I just searched “Jack Rejtman” and found this:

“Terms of use
This website (Site) is operated by Research Strategies Australia Pty Ltd ABN 68 639 246 487 (we, our or us).” Image
3/
“And look at the pretty colors and the big pictures…”

I wonder who Tim Cahill is. Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(