Join me online (Facebook - Marrickville Peace Group)
or at Marrickville TowHall at 4.45pm today AEST
for a discussion on the lies that lead to war, #AUKUS, US ForeignPolicy, geopolitical shifts, and #China
We cross to Col L Wilkerson in the US, who has told me (thread)
‘China so far is not a belligerent nation — actually, it need not be as its manufacturing capacity & thus its industrial base already surpasses that of any other country in the world…
China's supreme diplomat Wang Yi's recent orchestration of a rapprochement between Teheran ..
‘and Riyadh testifies to this reality. Today, it is the U.S. empire that is the belligerent.’
‘In the sad fashion of the lapdog London's current government has become, AUKUS represents not a bulwark to check the bellicose rise of Beijing but a U.S. imperial…
‘provocation to, at a minimum, create a new Cold War and, at a maximum, start a hot war that turns nuclear. Of late and terrifyingly, the latter seems Washington's ultimate aim.’
‘Australia should not go to war over Taiwan. It’s not in our interest…
‘ANZUS doesn’t oblige it. And it would make us a nuclear target. We would be on either the losing side or the side that can only win after sustaining gruesome losses. America loses wars, as former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser warned….
‘and has no compunction about dragging us to a defeat with them. We should aim to build détente between China and the US and work on guard rails that would protect both sides from catastrophe.’
Alison Broinowski:
‘any threat from China is being manufactured by Australia..
‘to justify the government's complete surrender of independence in foreign and defence policy. The military aggression planned by Australia is designed to provoke a Chinese response. Its sole purpose is to support US global hegemony, which serves neither..
‘Australian interests nor those of our neighbours. That AUKUS has been devised in secret, without democratic process and without factual detail, shows the erosion of the very Australian sovereignty that our leaders keep claiming is paramount.’
David Shoebridge in Parliament:
“Right now, the most powerful forces in the media—the weapons industry and the political class—are baying for war, and we should all be alarmed. Twenty years ago the world went to war on a lie. This followed a concerted campaign from these …
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Media partisanship leads not only to a collective demonisation of an assigned ‘enemy’, it leads to contempt for fellow journalists who won’t be co-opted into concealing the truth to protect the anointed.
Short thread on the contempt for Assange and Hersh:
Hersh said a journalist from Die Welt called (you’d be forgiven in thinking he was writing a story about the Nordstream sabotage) to ask him why he wrote the story.. Did he know it would help Russia? Similarly, Assange has been accused of publishing the DNC emails to help Trump..
Hersh said on @Consortiumnews that just as Congress will not investigate his story, the major news outlets regard it as a dead rat with lice on it & wouldn’t touch it, ‘especially under a Democrat govt’. When @wikileaks published the DNC emails, the MSM ignored the story the
What would war with #China look like for Australia? Part 2 - ABC News
Behm: ‘Australia has a "fundamental strategic pathology – to support the interests of the US at the expense of our own."’ abc.net.au/news/2023-02-2…
‘Korea was an unnecessary war, as were the conflicts in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan. Vietnam and Iraq were illegal wars, with the US Administration(s) lying to their citizens and their allies about the strategic necessity and the morality of the use of armed force.’
"..China's strategy is informed by Sun Tzu, it would have a strong preference for a short, sharp war. It is China is (un)likely to initiate an offensive war in the near future, until it is sure that it has enough mass to win quickly.”
Clue to why the US wants to provoke a war now
In contemplating the unfolding war in Ukraine, it helps to recall the lessons of the 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.
Small thread on how to start a proxy war and make it a success - famously recommended by Zbigniew Brzezinski
A fervent anti-communist, Jimmy Carter’s National Security advisor hatched a plot to create a ‘Soviet Vietnam’ - to lure the Soviet Union into an unwinnable depleting war. Disparate Afghan war lords - collectively known as the Mujahideen - had been attempting to overthrow
successive regimes sympathetic to the Soviet Union.
There were two important prongs to the strategy for this proxy war between the US and the Soviet Union.
1 - on the ground: the CIA covertly funded, armed and trained the Mujahideen from a base over the border in Pakistan while
Military buildup & AUKUS breast beating has nothing to do with protecting trade with China from China, it’s about the freedom to conduct military & intelligence activity in another country’s Exclusive Economic Zone - something China makes clear is not on arena.org.au/trade-routes-o…
The US “fears that if China’s position were to gain greater international acceptance, it would affect the United States’ ability to project naval and air power in other EEZs such as the Persian Gulf..” (1 of 2)
“That would force it to conduct operations from more than 200 miles offshore, significantly reducing the range of its sensors and missiles. It would be much harder to place its marines and their equipment in an amphibious tactical lodgement”.
I have requested permission to observe 20 April #Assange hearing when the magistrate will issue the order to extradite him to the US. The order will then go to the UK Home Secretary Priti Patel for approval. Assange's defence will make submissions to Patel by May 18th.
They intend to appeal the original decision on the grounds of Press Freedom and Fair Trial.
The last hearing held in a higher court was a farce. Journalists outside London were not informed as to whether there would be a link until last minute, were informed we were approved after the start of the short hearing, during which we managed to merely access a black screen ..
Day 2 of the US High Court #Assange Extradition Appeal in London.
Today the Defence will counter the arguments presented yesterday, & raise new reports from former US officials that the CIA considered kidnapping or murdering Assange. I’ll be covering proceedings on this thread.
They will also argue that if the Court decides to admit the US assurances & view them as comprehensive, then consideration will need to be given to which tribunal ought to assess their trustworthiness & will propose Baraitser as she has heard days of detailed evidence.
We heard yesterday that JA chose not to attend Court because of increased medication levels but subsequently @StellaMoris1 said that was not the case, that it was not his choice, that he was not permitted to attend, with no further information.