1/11 Very contrasting requirements for #txed public schools in Article 1 and the autonomy granted to private schools in Article 2 of the same #SB8. This thread highlights some of those differences:
2/11 The #sb8 bill is broken into 2 parts with ARTICLE 1. PARENTAL RIGHTS, SCHOOL LIBRARIES, AND CURRICULUM and ARTICLE 2. EDUCATION SAVINGS ACCOUNT PROGRAM.
3/11 Article 1: Districts have to create an Instructional Materials parent parent portal to allow parents to easily access all curriculum adopted or used. Organized and searchable by grade/subject
Article 2: State not permitted to interfere or regulate private school curriculum
4/11 Article 1: Schools required to develop a plan for parental participation in the district to improve parent and teacher cooperation, including in the areas of homework, school attendance, and discipline
Article 2: No similar requirements
5/11 Article 1: Parents have the right to direct the moral and religious training of their child without obstruction from state or political subdivision
Article 2: Private schools that receive ESA funds are not considered political subdivisions of the state
6/11 Article 1: Adds a new layer to existing grievance processes for parents of public school students (37 uses of word grievance in Article 1)
Article 2: No mention of any grievance process for parents in private schools (0 uses of word grievance in Article 2)
7/11 Article 1: Restriction on instruction regarding sexual orientation and gender identity
Article 2: No such restriction for private schools
8/11 Article 1: Full program review by parents of any comprehensive counseling program
Article 2: No restrictions listed on counseling programs
9/11 Article 1 does not mention the #STAAR test but,
Article 2 says the state cannot make any assessment requirement on the private schools receiving ESA/Voucher funds
10/11 It is reasonable for the #txlege to explain why they have added new parameters to #txed public schools(which I am not arguing against), but then simultaneously add wording into the same bill to ensure autonomy for private schools from these and other existing parameters
11/11 It is possible to support parental rights, support choice and options for families, recognize value in both public (isds and charters) and private school solutions, and yet be opposed to Article 2 as currently written in the #txlege#sb8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/8 I have worked in 2 isds and 1 charter for 30 total years, and served on a private school board for 6 years. I support school choice and the rights of parents. Even so, these are the reasons I think #sb8 needs to be changed from its current form.
2/8 The #txlege needs to change #sb8 so that if they want public dollars to be able to go to private schools, then those receiving schools should then agree to be subjected to the same regulations and measurement that is required of public schools.
3/8 If you believe that requiring regulations/measurement for ESA recipient schools will ruin the private schools and make #sb8 less attractive to both parents and the private schools, then isn't that an indictment of the policies that are required of public schools right now?
1/ If I was speaking in Austin or attempting to influence a legislator about #SB8 or any related ESA/Voucher bills, here are the things I would make sure that I knew about #sb8 (in current form on 3/21/23) and a few other points I would make: