Troy Mooney Profile picture
Mar 20 11 tweets 3 min read
1/11 Very contrasting requirements for #txed public schools in Article 1 and the autonomy granted to private schools in Article 2 of the same #SB8. This thread highlights some of those differences:
2/11 The #sb8 bill is broken into 2 parts with ARTICLE 1. PARENTAL RIGHTS, SCHOOL LIBRARIES, AND CURRICULUM and ARTICLE 2. EDUCATION SAVINGS ACCOUNT PROGRAM.
3/11 Article 1: Districts have to create an Instructional Materials parent parent portal to allow parents to easily access all curriculum adopted or used. Organized and searchable by grade/subject
Article 2: State not permitted to interfere or regulate private school curriculum
4/11 Article 1: Schools required to develop a plan for parental participation in the district to improve parent and teacher cooperation, including in the areas of homework, school attendance, and discipline

Article 2: No similar requirements
5/11 Article 1: Parents have the right to direct the moral and religious training of their child without obstruction from state or political subdivision

Article 2: Private schools that receive ESA funds are not considered political subdivisions of the state
6/11 Article 1: Adds a new layer to existing grievance processes for parents of public school students (37 uses of word grievance in Article 1)

Article 2: No mention of any grievance process for parents in private schools (0 uses of word grievance in Article 2)
7/11 Article 1: Restriction on instruction regarding sexual orientation and gender identity
Article 2: No such restriction for private schools
8/11 Article 1: Full program review by parents of any comprehensive counseling program
Article 2: No restrictions listed on counseling programs
9/11 Article 1 does not mention the #STAAR test but,
Article 2 says the state cannot make any assessment requirement on the private schools receiving ESA/Voucher funds
10/11 It is reasonable for the #txlege to explain why they have added new parameters to #txed public schools(which I am not arguing against), but then simultaneously add wording into the same bill to ensure autonomy for private schools from these and other existing parameters
11/11 It is possible to support parental rights, support choice and options for families, recognize value in both public (isds and charters) and private school solutions, and yet be opposed to Article 2 as currently written in the #txlege #sb8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Troy Mooney

Troy Mooney Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TroyMooney

Mar 22
1/8 I have worked in 2 isds and 1 charter for 30 total years, and served on a private school board for 6 years. I support school choice and the rights of parents. Even so, these are the reasons I think #sb8 needs to be changed from its current form.
2/8 The #txlege needs to change #sb8 so that if they want public dollars to be able to go to private schools, then those receiving schools should then agree to be subjected to the same regulations and measurement that is required of public schools.
3/8 If you believe that requiring regulations/measurement for ESA recipient schools will ruin the private schools and make #sb8 less attractive to both parents and the private schools, then isn't that an indictment of the policies that are required of public schools right now?
Read 8 tweets
Mar 21
1/ If I was speaking in Austin or attempting to influence a legislator about #SB8 or any related ESA/Voucher bills, here are the things I would make sure that I knew about #sb8 (in current form on 3/21/23) and a few other points I would make:
3/ I would review what the bill offers to parents in Article 1 of the bill:

Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(