Luca Prosperi Profile picture
Mar 20 10 tweets 5 min read
🧵/ You can choose whether to look at the moon or at the pointing finger instead

With #CreditSuisse #SVBank at al. getting pumped back to life by the State, we should start asking whether the state-bank alliance makes much sense anymore

BANKING IS BROKEN, HALLELUJAH 👇
1/ The fact that #SVBank failure was a shock for markets tells a lot about the quality of markets (and regulators)

Below, an extract from SVB's regulatory disclosures. What was the regulator doing instead of observing the most classic of bank’s maturity mismatches?
2/ I don't want to go all the way to conspiracy theory, but who was extracting the most value from #SVBank, or in other words who had more (short-term) incentives for SVB to keep operating as it was?

Below, another extract. Hint: not only tech benefited from low IR...
3/ Even taking so much interest rate risk, #SVBank wasn't making much money
* 2.73% average gross yield
* 2% average net yield
* 9-10% return on equity, i.e. below cost
* 0.85-0.90x price to tangible book

In other words, management ran a fast-growing value-burning bank
4/ Among the depositors of #SVBank that had the risk of losing a big chunk of their savings was @circle, the minter of $USDC

The risk underpinning $USDC, as well as its absolutely lack of yield for holders, is also not new. The extract below is from DR's 52 release
5/ To me, it is not the story of #SVBank mismanagement that matters, nor the finger-pointing

What matters is the blatant and absolutely unnecessary fragility of banking as we know it that emerged from this and other episodes

Today, we could and should do better
6/ The "OLD" monetary triangle was based on a very tight relationship between Treasury, Central Bank, and Commercial Banks

Commercial Banks distribute money through underwriting, have monopoly of currency storage, and are incentivised (big) buyers of treasuries
7/ The system is showing huge limits:
* DISTRIBUTION: are banks really needed here?
* UNDERWRITING: should banks have monopoly?
* RETURNS: can banks really be self-sustaining?
* RISK: are banks enough low risk for depositors?

My answer is NO to those questions. We can do better
8/ A "NEW" monetary triangle could emerge:
* SPECIALISED UNDERWRITERS distribute money - a combination of banks, funds, and protocols
* DEPOSITORS can access government risk directly rather than being meat for banks
* #CBDC of some sort act as a liquidity stabiliser only
9/ The current monetary framework has reached a point of no return. We need a new paradigm

“The competition between paradigms is not the sort of battle that can be resolved by proofs.” - The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Thomas Kuhn

dirtroads.substack.com/p/53-banking-i…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Luca Prosperi

Luca Prosperi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LucaProsperi

Feb 14
0/ I’m on a personal fight to remove the word Real-World Assets (or RWA) from the DeFi jargon

It is truly a logical insult and a counterintuitive definition that can do way more harm than good

*PLEASE* help - here is why 👇🏻
1/ EVERYTHING IS AN ASSET

Whether you can ascribe value to that, and with confidence, it’s a different story. But everything is an asset, from housing to $BTC to watches to reputation to time
2/ WE HAVE BEEN MATERIALISING ASSETS FOR CENTURIES

We started simple and became convoluted. Currently, even (sub-types of) risk, even volatility, is an asset. You own a CDS contract on your balance sheet you have an asset with a fair value
Read 6 tweets
Nov 18, 2022
0/ I’m a broken record but *I DON’T CARE*

It is easy to write post mortem on how bad was @FTX_Official fuck up, but useless

I’ll do something else, I will show you what parallelisms there are between FTX and a so-called OG I know well, @MakerDAO

Might be useful 🧵
1/ Sin 1 - CENTRALISED DECISION-MAKING

@FTX_Official power was controlled by a small group of insiders tight around the founder @SBF_FTX, with investors staying silent

@MakerDAO is de facto controlled by @RuneKek the founder and a tight group of insiders - proved in LOVE vote
2/ Sin 2 - LACK OF CHECKS AND BALANCES

@FTX_Official had completely unsatisfactory risk controls, making risk management impossible

@MakerDAO has developed Risk controls only for transparent ERC-20 exposure, but zero for off-chain exposures now approaching 500m
Read 8 tweets
Sep 5, 2022
0/🧵

DeFi liquidity went down from 200b ATH to current 60-ish, bettered by interest rates, frauds, bad execution

I couldn’t be happier to invest and build today. These are my:
# 3 most relevant protocols
# 3 protocols I’d stay away from
# 3 things we are missing IMO

🧵 👇🏻
1/10 Most relevant protocol # 1: @LidoFinance

With the merge coming, there’s no protocol that has higher potential to transform DeFi:
- Develop new primitive with $stETH
- Spin out native stable
- Expand across other PoS chains
- Express pressure on $ETH governance
2/10 Most relevant protocol # 2: @maplefinance

We all know DeFi needs institutional liquidity, but institutional liquidity needs quality of execution

Maple has worked hard to develop the infrastructure

We invested at @CherryVentures and it feels only the beginning
Read 11 tweets
Jul 15, 2022
0/7 > I had the intuition that flat & naive 1-token-1-vote crypto governance systems are *AWFUL* in uncertain environments, so I tried to prove it. This week Dirt Roads is for *NERDS* and modelled gonzo-mathematical games of governance 🧵👇

dirtroads.substack.com/p/-43-first-pr…
1/7 > 1st game: Optimistic Governance Game - OGG:
* Voters are good people
* Voters are not proponents
* Proposals can be benevolent or malevolent, and cannot be distinguished
* Malevolent proposals have huge private benefit at the expense of a probability of blow-up Image
2/7 > Even by being trivial, OGGs give us few hints:
* There’s incentive for bad proponents to promise a lot
* There’s a dominant incentive to look good
* Illiquidity (delayed outcome) has a premium
* Maximising for value isn’t equal to maximising for survival Image
Read 8 tweets
Jul 4, 2022
0/🧵Last week saw the most participated / contentious vote in the history of DAO governance happening at @MakerDAO

I have now had the time to absorb a lot of what happened in the past days, and being at the centre of it with my proposal for a Lending Oversight unit, my take 👇
1/🧵As a researcher, I have analysed for a while thru dirtroads.substack.com DAO governance and its virtuous and vicious results. I have written a ton about @feiprotocol and @RariCapital merger, @arca and @SushiSwap, @anchor_protocol, etc.

I believe in good governance
2/🧵I have spent many years in credit, and when I saw @MakerDAO's attempt to onboard real-world use cases I immediately got involved

Almost immediately, @MakerDAO_SES sponsored a research project ('Real-World Sandbox') to understand Maker's position along the lending stack
Read 12 tweets
Jun 27, 2022
1/4 🧵And so my days as CU facilitator @MakerDAO are over - before starting 😂

The ratification vote of Lending Oversight ❤️ attracted 294k voting $MKR - huge record. Most of institutional crypto backed the idea of financial oversight, but that wasn't enough, @RuneKek didn't
2/4 🧵 Worth noting:

Insane active VC participation

Founder re-centralising vote in Shadow Delegate

Previously ostracised co-founder resurrected -> his comeback message is a bliss

Tons of proxy voting

Concerted parties (borrowers too)

Last-minute re-delegation

$MKR borrows Image
🧵3/4 -> Many questions about REAL centralisation vs. entangled interest in crypto arise, and we should try to answer if we don't want another blowup

DeFi remains extremely immature and dangerous land, but we should all keep working hard

Stay tuned for this week's Dirt Roads
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(