Numbers and statistics can become abstract all too quickly. Humans are not interchangeable, and representing their deaths solely as a statistic obscures this. Whenever possible, iraqbodycount.org records and publishes demographic and personal details of victims.
We continue our series marking 20 years of the #IraqWar on the importance of case-by-case documentation in giving a human face to the victims of this war. As we wrote earlier:
Only incident-based recording can reveal human details such as the occupations of the killed and injured. By March 2005 we had recorded 153 occupations. Now they number over 800 (just 171, from A–C, showing in this graphic), a telling sign that no sector of society is spared.
No part of Iraq escaped the lethal violence of the invasion and its aftermath, although the violence peaked at different times in different places. The earlier years saw the greatest loss of life in Baghdad and Anbar (particularly Fallujah). During 2016 it was Mosul in Ninewa.
In the absence of names and occupations, it is still important to record what demographic information is available (e.g. age and gender). All deaths are concerning, but those of the most vulnerable even more so (e.g. children, who make up 10% of the recorded dead).
Children continue to be victims of violence right up to the present. On March 6 2023 near Muqdadiya, Baquba, a lawyer, his wife, and his two children were killed in an explosives attack on their car. shafaq.com/ar/%D8%A3%D9%8…
Resources permitting, IBC is committed to increasing our efforts to record the dead as the individuals they were in life, as remembered by those who knew and loved them: a project we began to develop in 2015 iraqbodycount.org/analysis/refer…
No victim should unnecessarily remain hidden in a statistic. The nascent Iraq Digital Memorial will allow the production of permanent, publicly-accessible victim records using testimony and media from relatives, friends and colleagues (along the lines of iraqbodycount.org/database/incid…)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/20 We open this thread with a poll on a real poll from 3 Apr 2003 that asked the US public if they’d say the war in Iraq was “successful if it removed Saddam… and fewer than [N] Iraqi civilians were killed”.
Guess the number above which the majority judged “not successful”
2/20 It is 20 years later, and today IBC updated its documented violent civilian death toll to 186,797–210,166. Which stands in desperately sad and bitter contrast to the result of the 2003 L.A.Times poll: 500, an answer that may astound many people today. rand.org/pubs/monograph…
3/ So a majority of the US public of 2003 felt that if more than 500 Iraqi civilians were killed in the war, it would not be worth it. Very different from the US Ambassador to the UN who could justify 500,000 Iraqi (child) deaths in the 1990s, when presented with that estimate.
.@iraqbodycount begins a series of posts marking the 20th anniversary with a version of its timeline at iraqbodycount.org/database indicating #civilians killed not as an additive but an aptly subtractive graph, with bars showing the loss in civilian lives each month. #Iraq#IraqWar
The violent #civilian death toll of the 20 year old #IraqWar continues to grow. @iraqbodycount has monitored this from the beginning, giving totals and continuous updates on a public website detailing the incidents and individuals killed in them. iraqbodycount.org/database/incid…
Credible records now bring the combined total of violent deaths, both civilian and combatant on all sides, to over 300,000. Some three-quarters of this number are civilian (which includes some not yet processed from the #WikiLeaks war logs and more recent mass grave discoveries).
@iraqbodycount begins a series of posts marking the 20th anniversary with a version of its timeline at iraqbodycount.org/database indicating #civilians killed not as an additive but an aptly subtractive graph, with bars showing the loss in civilian lives each month. #Iraq#IraqWar
The violent #civilian death toll of the 20 year old #IraqWar continues to grow. @iraqbodycount has monitored this from the beginning, giving totals and continuous updates on a public website detailing the incidents and individuals killed in them. iraqbodycount.org/database/incid…
Credible records now bring the combined total of violent deaths, both civilian and combatant on all sides, to over 300,000. Some three-quarters of this number are civilian (which includes some not yet processed from the #WikiLeaks war logs and more recent mass grave discoveries).
Casualty recording: an unending task in a time of endless wars
20 yrs ago, on Feb 15th 2003, IBC’s UK-based volunteers and founders joined the huge demonstrations against the looming war. Like others we hoped the war and its cost in civilian and military lives could be averted.
Part of our response, should the worst happen, was to prepare to accurately document as many of the civilian casualties as possible.Our website—already live at iraqbodycount.org—had actually recorded its first civilian death on Jan 1st, a US airstrike killing one civilian.
On the eve of the invasion Tony Blair proclaimed to Parliament that Saddam Hussein “will be responsible for many, many more deaths even in one year than we will be in any conflict.” This prediction was baseless when made and quickly proven false by IBC’s early work.
1/11 There is nothing to ‘commemorate’ about the March 2003 invasion of Iraq, but it needs remembering in every civilian life-destroying detail. This thread is about those deadly first weeks, drawn from @iraqbodycount analyses summarised in iraqbodycount.org/analysis/refer…
2/11 The rate at which civilians were killed by invading US-led forces in the 21 days from 20 March–9 April (invasion to “fall of Baghdad”) was 315 per day – so high compared to the following 2-year period it could not fit on the same intensity graph:
3/11 By 18 Apr, coalition aircraft dropped on Iraq “a total of 29,199 bombs, rockets, and missiles of all varieties.” 2/3 were “precision guided weapons”, 1/3 “unguided”; 78% of 20,000+ airstrikes supported ground forces using their own devastating arms.