For roughly £20 million the Home Office could've cleared the asylum backlog it created, reducing associated costs such as hotels. Instead it plans to pay nearly £10 billion on a policy which appears specifically designed to fail. #r4today 1/
thetimes.co.uk/article/4c2cf7…
The #IllegalBill, can only put more people at risk, including tens of thousands of children. It denies modern slavery victims protection, boosting gang control, and removes human rights from the most vulnerable, as well as sees children risk deportation 2/
theguardian.com/world/2023/mar…
The government's own figures show that, despite rhetoric of the likes of Braverman, the vast majority of those seeking asylum in the UK, by any means, receive it because they need it. Data also shows how few comparatively to likes of France etc UK takes 3/
People aren't coming to the UK because of its benefits system. Not only are asylum seekers blocked from getting council housing, they are also denied the right to work, and receive less support, including financial, than in countries such as France and Germany. 4/
As the @ukhomeoffice's own analysis shows though, even that doesn't make a big difference, for the same reason as deterrents don't work, people seeking asylum don't tend to know the policies of the country they are seeking it in. They seek it because of existing ties. 5/
All of this means Braverman's #AntiRefugeeBill is a pointless, inhuman and costly exercise in cruelty, built on misleading and inflammatory rhetoric, which won't reduce anything, but will increase the number of people at risk, including children, at more expense. #StopTheBill 6/
Full respect to @refugeecouncil for actually doing the working out on this, which appears to be more than the Home Office has done. 7/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniel Sohege 🧡

Daniel Sohege 🧡 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stand_for_all

Mar 19
Thread: Let's just take a quick look at some of the points @SuellaBraverman makes in the @ukhomeoffice's latest PR fluff piece about its Rwanda plan shall we? 1/
Refugees will be "protected and supported". Not strictly speaking accurate considering refugees already in Rwanda face significant abuse and abandonment, including being left destitute and starving and facing sexual assaults from the authorities. 2/
Fastest growing does not mean "grown". More than 90% of the population in Rwanda live in poverty, so it was a low starting point, and due to how densely populated the country is, among other limitations, inequality is projected to increase. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Mar 19
Likewise with models of Auschwitz. There are so many things to condemn Braverman about, but faked images, tweets etc just mean she can claim she is being personally targeted. I know how tempting it is to share them, but it undermines actual advocacy. Please don't.
I am not saying you play some middle of the road argument, just that when you amplify things which can then be turned around and spun by the government you make it harder to get actual arguments listened to. It becomes a distraction from the obscenities being carried out.
There is enough vileness in what the government is doing to take them to task on. It doesn't need fakes to make the point. Hit them on what they are doing and don't give them any angle by which to undermine your own arguments.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 18
I regret to inform you that Matt has been at it again, but it is okay because he has ignored the overwhelming evidence which disproves his assertion by conducting his own "polls". ImageImageImageImage
Where Goodwin could, if he didn't on a regular basis seem determined to mislead people with disingenuous "polls", have a case is that people are concerned about the manner which people arrive in the UK, as opposed to actually seeking asylum.
People see splashes with glossy pics in the media and hear the rhetoric from politicians, but reality is when the framing is focused on providing asylum rather than manner of entry, including emphasising "irregular routes", the public supports providing protection for refugees.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 23
The latest Immigration Stats. Couple of things to note. Firstly, while up on previous years, the overall number of applications is still down on the peak of 20 years ago, yet the backlog in processing applications has grown for nine years. 1/
gov.uk/government/sta…
Also worth noting that the current increase is also reflected in the increase in asylum applications in the EU, and likely caused by a "rebalancing" of people seeking asylum after a drop seen during the pandemic. So should not be considered a long-term trend at this point. 2/
Nearly half of those arriving via small boats came from five countries, Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Eritrea and Sudan. Statistically these are all countries with high rates of grant rates, and definitely countries this government couldn't return all of them to. 3/
Read 16 tweets
Feb 14
Attacks like those in Knowsley aren't because of "concerned parents". They are down to a rising, coordinated, far-right campaign, and it is emboldened by the rhetoric and misinformation about asylum seekers spread by certain politicians and press. #r4today
thetimes.co.uk/article/f28528…
Plenty of people have tried to make out attacks against asylum seekers are all down to "legitimate concerns". They aren't. There is nothing "legitimate" about #KnowsleyRiots, and nothing "legitimate" about far-right thugs going after people seeking safety.
Spurred on by language, such as used by the Home Secretary, their claims that the people in hotels aren't "genuine refugees" are easily and rapidly debunked by the Home Office's own data, which shows how vast majority are recognised as needing protection.
gov.uk/government/sta…
Read 10 tweets
Feb 5
Dear God @grantshapps please learn at least the basics before speaking. Carrier liability fines prevent asylum seekers using commercial routes, and NO-ONE CHOOSES TO BE TRAFFICKED. This is where knowing the difference between trafficking and smuggling would be helpful for an MP.
The UK has very few, highly limited, government approved resettlement routes, which is why people have to make small boat crossings. It is the only way for many to seek asylum in the UK, and their right not to be penalised for manner of entry is guaranteed under international law
That by the way doesn't change on jot of the UK leaves the European Convention on Human Rights. It would also take leaving the Convention relating to the status of refugees and several other treaties which prohibit "refoulement", returning people to unsafe countries.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(