Share this page!

Richard Geldreich Profile picture
Twitter logo
Mar 23 • 4 tweets • 1 min read
Everybody (CCP/Russia/US) is in deadlock: We don't want to declassify Crash Retrievals, because we're all afraid of what the other guy might learn. But until we declassify and get a critical mass of scientists looking at the situation, there's little to no progress.
#ufotwitter
The phenomenon (really, what appears to be one or more foreign forces that trespasses in our airspaces/lands at will) can easily exploit this situation. The last thing they would want is Disclosure because that's the pathway out of this mess.
In the US, I get a strong superweapon vibe from the C/R (crash retrieval) situation. If we keep the topic super classified, maybe we'll have a secret breakthrough before CCP/Russia. It's been ~75 years - doubtful. Their methodology is broken.
An alternative scenario is the US is already partially fallen to "foreign" forces (Corso's "kind of surrender", and others). The materials from C/R's just go into a black hole, never to be seen again. This would explain many things.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Richard Geldreich

Richard Geldreich Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @richgel999

Richard Geldreich Profile picture
Mar 22
If you're new to Disclosure, or still believe C/R's (Crash Retrievals, i.e. "Roswell" etc.) haven't happened, I would suggest 3 sources to begin with. First parse the NY Times. (I've been surprised how many can't understand this article.)

nytimes.com/2020/07/28/ins…
Next is Dr. Eric W. Davis PhD, who according to the NY Times gave 2 classified briefings to the Senate in 2019. It's a slow interview, kinda boring, except for the middle which is extremely revealing (obviously purposely):
Finally is Dr. Hal Puthoff. Pay attention to his usage of "C/R":
Read 7 tweets
Richard Geldreich Profile picture
Oct 6, 2022
Here's a clear description of UAP's using Metric Engineering - from 1956. Nothing fundamentally new has been revealed to the public since the 1950's.

cufos.org/CSI_NY/CSI_NY_…

#ufotwitter #uaptwitter
Most of the major themes and high-level ideas about what we know today about UAP's was already known by approximately 1958. The terminology is different, and in '58 only a tiny collection of dedicated researchers knew about some of the wilder stuff. Very little new has surfaced.
In many ways we actually know less about the phenomenon than researchers and even the general public knew in the 50's.
Read 5 tweets
Richard Geldreich Profile picture
Oct 6, 2022
The "Working Group" kept the subject of UAP's and C/R's (Crash Retrievals) in the public eye for decades: Dr. Edward Teller created Lazar in the 80's. And Dr. Vannevar Bush pushed his associates from the war to help reveal the Aztec C/R to Scully.

#ufotwitter #uaptwitter
They would bypass national security and just force it into the public realm. That's how powerful MJ-12 was.
There was an intelligence force behind these operations: MAJIC or "Majestic Intelligence Controlled"
Read 4 tweets
Richard Geldreich Profile picture
Oct 6, 2022
There's no longer a need to classify C/R's (Crash Retrievals) because all the major powers (Russia, China, and the US) each have had their share of crashes now (Dr. Davis). The subject naturally tends to keep itself secret because few understand it, or can handle it.
#ufotwitter
This allows the US, for example, to recruit for the CRP (Crash Retrieval Program - again Dr. Davis) right in the open! They can even put the declassification announcement right in NY Times. Still, basically nobody gets it yet - even people on ufotwitter.

nytimes.com/2020/07/28/ins…
Cognitive Dissonance is so powerful that the NatSec state can depend on it to keep the situation relatively calm while they recruit more engineers & scientists with security clearances to examine the retrieved debris and attempt to back-engineer it.
Read 6 tweets
Richard Geldreich Profile picture
Oct 5, 2022
To avoid mass ontological shock and cognitive dissonance causing a partial collapse scenario, they're extraordinarily slowly spreading out Disclosure over many decades. We'll likely be 20-30 years older before much more significant info is released.

#ufotwitter #uaptwitter
However, it's relatively easy to get 10-30 years ahead just by investing the time and energy into researching the topic yourself.
As far as I can tell through public record crawls, this acclimation effort started around mid to late 1949.
Read 5 tweets
Richard Geldreich Profile picture
Oct 5, 2022
The supposed Roswell craft (illustrated by Kevil D. Randle and others) looks totally badass. I could see this shape being quite inspirational to aircraft engineers in the late 40's/50's. (Thanks @xExist)

#ufotwitter #uaptwitter Image
It was said to have been constructed of incredibly lightweight material.
Sorry meant "Kevin D. Randle" (typo). Maybe Musk can finally give us the ability the fix typos in tweets.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Send Email!

:(