Wales the most LGBTQ+ friendly nation?

You might as well take the LGB out of that right now on this showing @WelshGovernment

A shocking bin-fire of a meeting

@UKLabour @Keir_Starmer no wonder women can’t trust you

#RespectMySex

A 🧵
It may have helped if the host from @LGBTLabour had actually asked questions from those attending

Did you know questions were rapidly being deleted from the chat bar @hannahblythyn?

Did you know that lesbians were being silenced?
Did you know that any challenges to the deletion of questions were being removed @hannahblythyn?

We’d like the host from @LGBTLabour ‘Ash’ to explain why the questions of lesbian were repeatedly deleted

Surely the L is an important part of the LGBTQ+ Plan? Surely? No?
Do you support the silencing of lesbians @Keir_Starmer @hannahblythyn @PrifWeinidog?

If not, what are you doing about the authoritarian attitude of @LGBTLabour?

You won’t win over the female vote like this
Of course, the magnificent Kate Harris of @ALLIANCELGB spoke up and praised you @hannahblythyn for attending this meeting

& told you that questions from lesbians were being deleted

The host then removed her from the meeting - Shameful!

theguardian.com/society/2022/s…
Are the experiences of brave detransitioners an inconvenient truth for @WelshGovernment?

Where are they in your not-so-friendly LGBTQ+ plan? Nowhere

A woman was removed for posting this question

What’s your answer @hannahblythyn?
A woman posted a question about the pressure on same-sex attracted youth

She was removed from the meeting

Is same-sex attraction now unmentionable to @WelshGovernment and @UKLabour? The love that dare not speak its name - again?

#LesbianVisibility
Here we go again

Another woman removed - for daring to post a question about whether @WelshGovernment had paid attention to the Cass review

Nice mention of Time to Think by @hannahsbee - perhaps we’ll get them all a copy!

Have you read it yet @Keir_Starmer?
And now a question on the likelihood of @WelshGovernment being able to implement their plans

And the utter debacle of GRR in Scotland

Plus failure to consult with women

Woman removed from the meeting without explanation

@wrnwales
@MerchedCymru
@FiLiA_charity
It goes on and on - by now the meeting could have moved into a telephone box

Women are being silenced
Lesbians are being silenced

@WelshGovernment @UKLabour are not listening outside their echo chamber

& @LGBTLabour are an authoritarian disgrace
So do you condemn this conduct @hannahblythyn @PrifWeinidog?

Do you intend to respond to the unanswered questions of these women? We’re waiting @WelshGovernment

Do you condemn the behaviour of the host @LGBTLabour?

Or is this just a TQ+ plan and LGB are not welcome?
You are silencing women @UKLabour

You are repeating the mistakes of Scottish Govt

This is why women have no confidence @Keir_Starmer @UKLabour

You don’t #RespectMySex
Please unroll @threadreaderapp

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wales-Women’s Rights Network 💜🤍💚🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

Wales-Women’s Rights Network 💜🤍💚🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WRNWales

Nov 21
HERE WE GO AGAIN. 🚨
@WelshGovernment have released their voluntary Diversity & Inclusion guidance for political parties.
The consultation closes on 7th January 2025.

1/8 🧵
Draft diversity and inclusion guidance for registered political parties [HTML] | GOV.WALES
The guidance is split into three parts for political parties:
1. Publication of a strategy
2. Collection of data
3. Quotas for women candidates
For obvious reasons, we are particularly interested in Part 3.

2/8 Image
The guidance refers to 'specified characteristics' which go beyond the Equality Act 2010.
Sex is referred to within this and IS linked to the Act.

HOWEVER. This section relates only to Parts 1 and 2. Strategy and Data. NOT quotas for women.
Guess what this means?
3/8 Image
Image
Read 9 tweets
Sep 27
We’re pleased to UPDATE on our below interaction with @WalesOnline.

After a further complaint about inaccuracy, BOTH articles have been corrected, meaning that we don’t have to take this to IPSO.

It’s worth digging in . Accuracy matters in journalism. As does fairness.
1/5
After an email to the political editor, then the editor (no response) we made our complaint about inaccuracy.
2/5 Image
We have subsequently been informed that BOTH articles have been corrected.

This article of 26/9 (in which we are also now quoted), had used the word ‘female’ originally - when the Bill had avoided any such reference.

3/5

walesonline.co.uk/news/politics/…

Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 21
Is @WalesOnline an impartial and accurate news source?

On 18/9 they published this story, which is both factually inaccurate and biased.
We contacted both the reporter and the editor to offer balance and to correct the inaccuracies.
NO RESPONSE.
A 🧵
1/8
The article reports on the response of several groups, who were all keen to see the ‘Gender Quotas’ Bill become law in Wales.

Their views are reported uncritically, along with their disappointment with Welsh Government at the scrapping of the Bill.
2/8
We didn’t share their enthusiasm. Neither did other women or groups.

The Bill attempted to introduce self ID.
It also allowed for at LEAST 50% of candidates to be ‘women’ on electoral lists.
It did NOT allow for a 50/50 split as claimed inaccurately in the article.
3/8
Read 9 tweets
Sep 19
It’s a mystery why @RhysOwenThomas MS has proposed a specific set of amendments to the ‘Gender Quotas’ Bill as potential ‘corrupt practices’.

This of course is the very Bill that would have sneaked in self ID to Wales.

A 🧵
1/4 Image
The Bill is recommended for withdrawal, but will be debated and voted on next week at the Senedd.

The proposed amendments appear to us to suggest that anyone challenging a statement that a candidate is a ‘woman’ could be criminally liable.

2/4

business.senedd.wales/documents/s153…
Image
We don’t buy that this is to protect female candidates from ‘force, violence or restraint’ or any threats.

Existing criminal law more than adequately covers that.

So is this MS seeking to silence any challenge to ‘gender statements’ instead via criminal law?

3/4
Read 6 tweets
Sep 16
Self ID in Wales has been defeated (for now anyway).

The scrapping of the ‘Gender Quotas Bill’ concludes what has been an embarrassing and shoddy episode in the history of the Welsh Senedd. And a scandalously wasteful one too.
A 🧵
1/9

bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
Those who have been following this Bill will know that WRN Wales leaked an earlier version.

This version made it very clear that the definition of ‘woman’ for the purpose of the Bill, would include men. And that it could not be challenged.

2/9
This attempt to lever in self ID via a Bill, meant to be about improving the number of women on electoral lists, was always critically flawed.

The Bill failed to define ‘woman’.
And the lack of legislative competence was a recurring headache.
3/9
Read 10 tweets
Jul 16
We don’t know if ANYONE is left at the #Senedd today, but we are here at least!

We’ll be listening to the debate on the Electoral Candidates Lists Bill.
Will Members support or reject it?
Either way, it’s looking like being kicked into the long grass to 2030.
#NoToSelfID
🧵
Our letter following the release of the report of the Reform Bill Committee.
2/
Image
Image
Report of the Reform Bill Committee at Stage 1 is here.
3/

senedd.wales/media/k1kk33yx…
Read 35 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(