We also wrote to @Plaid_Cymru, (the party of Wales apparently), following the Supreme Court judgment.
Plaid have aspirations in the Senedd elections of 2026. Surely they would have a lot to say to the female electorate of Wales on the rights of women and girls?
1/
Here’s their response to our letter sent in early May 2025.
That’s right. Nothing to say.
@RhunapIorwerth usually has a lot to say. He had nothing to say to us about the Supreme Court judgment.
Perhaps you’d like to rectify that Rhun? We’re all ears.
2/
Perhaps @Plaid_Cymru find themselves compromised by these statements which are still on their website, and in direct conflict with the Supreme Court judgment.
Until clarified, we can only presume they will breach the law and care not a jot about women’s rights.
This recent letter from our First Minister assures us of a further meeting.
However, there is a complete failure to grasp the implications of the judgment now, the damage that is being wreaked on women’s rights in Wales, and no acknowledgment or apology to women’s groups.
In an FOI response, @WelshGovernment stated they had sent a Ministerial letter to Baroness Falkner at the @EHRC.
That letter was from Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice Jane Hutt.
But we can exclusively reveal there’s even more!
Links below ⬇️
🧵1/4
What do you think @WelshGovernment’s considered response to the EHRC consultation following the Supreme Court judgment would be?
3 options to follow!
Will it be:
a) An impeccably logical analysis of the draft guidance, providing useful commentary?
Nope. Not that at all. 1/5
Or is it:
b) An empassioned examination of where the TQ+ will be disadvantaged by discovering they never legally had the ‘rights’ (entitlements) Welsh Government told them they had?
Nope. Not that either.
2/5
Or could it be:
c) A level headed acknowledgement of the restoration and protection of the rights of women and girls to privacy, dignity, safety and fairness?