I don't want to *quote tweet* @MattWalshBlog but I'll quote him this way. he said something amusing (betraying his own fears) but it's also very telling, and typical of the "#conservative" (i.e. #fascist) set:
"The Leftist Rage Mob Turns On One Of Its Own | Ep. 113x"
(cont'd)
the *leftist rage mob*. heavens! those leftists (or "woke" folks or whoever) are so *angry*! all the time!
angry people are always wrong; just ask @mtaibbi or @NateSilver538 (or @MattWalshBlog) and they'll tell you: being angry is evil and only evil leftists are angry.
(cont'd)
that's part of the doublethinkful game that right-wing people are used to playing with emotions: they can't make up their minds whether leftists are always *angry* or whether they're always weak and crying—but #conservatives are at least certain that *emotions* are bad.
(cont'd)
it's leftist or "woke" people who are angry (or crying or whatever), whereas @MattWalshBlog, @realchrisrufo, &c. pretend they're Mr. Spock—calm logical machines, believing only in what's rational and sensible and *sane*. only crazy leftists have emotions, or something.
(cont'd)
...and that's a bit of a *hint*. or it should be. I wonder if you notice what the issue is.
it's basically this: @MattWalshBlog &c. want you to believe two things at the same time: they want to pretend they're calm and logical—but also ready to EXPLODE any time.
(cont'd)
they want to pretend that they're simply *inundated* with outrages against sanity and civilization, poised at any moment to explode into open violence—which they'd claim was fully justified, the honest patriotic violence of honest patriots (like @ThisIsKyleR's murders.)
(cont'd)
they're *outraged*—and yet only leftists are filled with rage, somehow.
does that mean that whenever @MattWalshBlog is blithering (again) about "castration" and "mutilation" and all the other standard lies about trans persons...his rage is simply *false*? is he acting?
(cont'd)
is @MattWalshBlog *not* truly enraged by these things? it's rather difficult to be angry, really and truly angry, at stuff that's not quite real. there's no epidemic of child castrations and mutilations, even if the right-wing propaganda is full of cherrypicked horrors.
(cont'd)
and it's already well-established that child rape does not enrage @MattWalshBlog, so long as it's a Christian doing the raping.
so...is Matt Walsh perhaps simply incapable of rage?
that's not necessarily a good thing. lacking proper emotional responses is...an issue.
(cont'd)
well. that's between @MattWalshBlog and his mental health counsellors (if any.)
~Mona Drafter of Pnictogen
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
imagination is life. imagination is central to thought.
it's also vital to the _tokusatsu_ show "Ressha Sentai ToQger", vide infra. "ToQger" is a favorite of ours—the heroes' greatest strength is their imagination, which their enemies hope to snuff out.
(cont'd)
in Western society, only a few persons are allowed to have #imagination. it's true. imagination, in most persons in "the West", is punished.
consider the @elonmusk / @mtaibbi cult: the reason that Elon Musk is so adored is that he's allowed to have a free imagination.
(cont'd)
there's nothing very much *original* about @elonmusk's imagination, which has an antique quality about it. it's not merely a question of advancing years, although Musk (despite his babyish personality) is getting old. Akira Kurosawa was imaginative till the day he died.
I have never watched Richard Nixon's actual infamous 1962 televised breakdown, after he lost the California gubernatorial election to incumbent Pat Brown.
this is the speech in which Mr. Nixon said "you won't have me to kick around anymore"—it's well-known. I haven't seen it!
Chara hasn't seen it, I don't think. Frisk almost certainly has, but a long time ago.
it seems to be difficult to find a straightforward clip of Mr. @dick_nixon's concession speech in 1962! here is a partial clip:
here's an edited video that uses a bit more of the *audio* from the concession speech:
fragments. this is frustrating! this is one of the most famous moments in American history! do I need to go to the @dick_nixon library to see the whole thing?
we aren't used to strict Christian upbringing; it's tough for us to watch. we have to remind ourselves that things aren't what they first seem.
Mrs. Nixon is a strict Quaker; she addresses young @dick_nixon with "thee"—this may sound merely *upsetting* to modern ears.
(cont'd)
"thee" and "thou" and "thy", however, are pronouns used to refer to human beings in a general way, i.e. not an excessively *familiar* and specific way. Spanish, for example, has a similar distinction between the general-purpose _usted_ and the familiar _tú_.
(cont'd)
in addressing her son with "thee", Mrs. Nixon is reminding her son that she speaks to him as one Christian to another—as one person to another. it's slightly distancing, yes, but it's not meant to be hurtful or punitive, even if it seems that way.
Murray Chotiner (played by famous Yiddish theatre actor Fyvush Finkel) gives us a summary of the dedicated politician, the person who believes for whatever reason that they ought to be in charge of things.
"Because if he's not this Nixon [i.e. President] he's nobody".
(cont'd)
this mindset is *foreign* to us. who thinks this about themselves?
lots of people, as it turns out. large numbers of Americans are raised to believe that they somehow *deserve* to have life-and-death power over millions of human beings—they think it's their *calling*.
(cont'd)
@elonmusk keeps staggering forward towards his antic visions of The Future™ because he believes in himself—wherever he gets his sense of destiny, he's got it, and he believes in it, and he thinks the Cosmos *needs* him. and thus, Elon Musk has admirers and believers.
Nixon: "Howard Hunt is working for the White House? Jesus Christ."
the very word *conspiracy* carries a lot of false connotations with it—notions perpetuated by peddlers of *false* conspiracies, like you'll find in the @elonmusk / @mtaibbi / @ShellenbergerMD crowd.
(cont'd)
people of @mtaibbi's stripe want "conspiracy" to conjure up mental fantasies of sinister organizations of evildoers—as if @TheDemocrats or "the Cabal" (the antisemitic QAnon trope) were like S.P.E.C.T.R.E. from Bond movies or S.E.E.L.E. from "Neon Genesis Evangelion".
(cont'd)
*real* conspiracies are messy and slipshod. they're still _conspiracies_—that is to say, they're still groups of people all working together (directly or indirectly) towards a common nefarious goal. but they're not all necessarily masterminds, or being masterminded.
Ollie Stone's "Nixon" begins with Howard Hunt's CREeP boys prepping for the Watergate breakin and for some reason they're watching a short film on sales technique—for all I know, this is historical, but for now we take this as a reminder of a common *theme* about Nixon.
(cont'd)
the theme was most famously explored in Joe McGinnis's book "The Selling of the President, 1968"—Nixon, the book asserts, was a triumph of slick *marketing*. young Richard Nixon was not an appealing man, but he was able to rebrand himself as an older, wiser statesman.
(cont'd)
there's a direct line to be drawn between Mr. @dick_nixon's 1968 marketing machine, and the current-day attempts of the @GOP—an extremist Christian fascist party—to rebrand itself, with the help of frauds like @elonmusk and @mtaibbi, as somehow the rebellious outsiders.