If you assign a high chance to AI doom (I don't, but say you do) then, come to think of it, most effective thing you could do is ban crypto. Not just regulate. Outright ban everything crypto related, on the China model (e.g. 10 years in prison).
As it stands, there's a reasonable chance that a malevolent AGI can be isolated and "unplugged". But what to do about an AGI that runs decentralized in the cloud, cryptographically secured, masked by decentralized VPN, limitless power to mount Sybil attacks on identity systems?
I explored such a scenario in my short story WAGMI in November 2021. akarlin.com/wagmi/ The AI, driven by the need to make its creators money, trades its way up, making identities and buying more processing power in a feedback loop, until it owns most of the world economy.
You're not going to go very far from just capping hardware, since normies, states, gamers, etc. all want more powerful computers, but crypto bros already have an extremely toxic reputation in most of the world & it would actually be politically feasible to repress them.
Just hook AI safety talking points into already extant rhetoric about climate impacts (Greens/left), tax evasion (left), undermining the dollar (burger boomers), "not being productive" (Munger like fossils), rogue regime sanctions evasion (neocons), extremist fundraising...
... and criminalize the possession and trade of *decentralized* cryptocurrencies.
I obviously don't advocate or endorse any of this because I'm an AI optimist, a long-term crypto bull ideologically, and would probably be personally #rekt on top. akarlin.com/ai-safety-deba…
However, from the view of intellectual honesty, I do think crypto criminalization is the lowest hanging branch aka most politically feasible way to reduce AGI risk. Appealing to private corps to forego the profit motive or nuke ASML/TSMC are... rather less realistic propositions.
It's the principle of tradeoffs and having your cake and eating it too. You have a choice, you can choose credible AI restrictionism or you can choose global cryptographic freedom & faster radical life extension timelines, I don't think you can have both.
* Development of AGI with all its manifold boons inc. RLE and IQ/acc
* AI safety
* Network states (financial & identity systems secured by decentralized cryptocurrencies)
Pick two!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Many of the motivated, high IQ Ukrainians signed up early - and have since been significant attritioned (UA one of the few countries where nationalism increases with IQ). Troops hovered up in increasingly coercive future mobilization waves will be lower quality & less motivated.
7% of the Kyiv School of Economics alumnae are allegedly dead.
But quite obviously Higher School of Economics in Moscow didn't lose 7% of its alumnae, 0.7% of its alumnae, or even 0.07% of its alumnae. (However, 7% may have temporarily emigrated).
"I see you are running out of K and L, why don't you try increasing A?"
"No."
Imagine a dozen packs of a dozen of these hounds, cumulatively worth no more than a single T-72B3 (=$1-2M) let alone a dozen of them, loaded with modular arm extensions for throwing grenades, LM launchers, machine guns, just explosives, and control dogs.
Really illustrates a fascinating but as yet little remarked upon phenomenon, the US has basically become a giant Switzerland in terms of prices. It's now a very expensive place by world standards. Late 80s/90s Japan vibes.
The Third World being cheap we knew, hence the old "downshifting" fad, but Europe outside the Banana is (esp. London, Switzerland) is also cheap, to Americans, given their very high wages for professionals. Japan is cheap!!
This is a map of local purchasing power parity, not official PPP figures, but crowd sourced ones from Numbeo. Some stuff we knew already; only Americans and Blue🍌Europeans live well (not Japanese, not europoors at large). Only thing that's interesting here is India.
Unusually vicious new mobilization in Ukraine (+ anecdotes like this) implies growing challenges in recruiting manpower. Whether the goal is to just replenish losses or raise new troops for the summer offensives is an open but very important question.
This is not a criticism of Ukraine. I repeatedly said that it would need to resort to increasingly repressive measures (which are still very lenient by World War era standards!) to raise manpower as the war goes on. Unlike some, they at least realize the importance of manpower.
"The Kremlin has begun to conduct polling domestically to gauge the popularity of another mobilization, two officials said. The next mobilization, some believe, would be quieter compared to the first one, when Putin himself made a televised announcement.." edition.cnn.com/2023/01/24/pol…