1/ So this Corbyn/Starmer expulsion stuff. It's not really my business these days. But it's trending & I have an opinion so why not. What are #Starmer's objectives, given the odd move of barring @jeremycorbyn from being an MP while allowing him to remain a Labour member.
2/ I think the intention is clear from the content of the motion. The aim is to use JC's loyalty to the Labour Party against him forcing him to make a choice between remaining as an MP and retaining the friendship/ support networks he's had in Labour for about 50yrs.
3/ I suspect Starmer is banking on Corbyn's residual loyalty to the party and the interventions of Corbyn "allies" worried over what his exit from the Party means for the Labour/Momentum left. JC is by far the most popular representative of that side of the party & ...
4/ ... Without that association they are screwed. If JC remains a Labour member but not MP the Momentum crowd can keep milking his reputation for their own benefit. There will be no barriers to selfies, attending events with him etc. But this begs the question...
5/ ... Why would #starmer want to throw a bone to the Momentum left? Probably for the same reason he hasn't yet proscribed it even though he's clearly free to whatever the hell he likes. Starmer is an establishment man leading an establishment party whose main function is...
6/ To contain and control dissent. Momentum's main purpose is to funnel Socialists into this dead end. Momentum relies both on the Labour Party & Corbyn for their platform, profile and influence. Corbyn leaving wld force them to choose Labour but their profile wld be diminished.
7/ Corbyn leaving completely wld also be a problem for the establishment who need his his popularity to be contained & limited by an organisation they control. Without Corbyn, Labour would be damaged as the main vehicle of legitimised dissent. Moreover...
8/ Corbyn himself would become a rallying point for dissent outside Labour. This would put people who rely on both Corbyn and Labour for their status and careers in a very difficult position. Some wld no doubt make the jump with him to ensure the operation is controlled...
9/ ... & I believe @ProgIntl serves that function to an extent anyway. Nevertheless, I'd be REALLY interested to know which Corbyn allies are begging him to stay within the Labour fold, as I think it would reveal their true agenda. I am completely out of the loop...
10/10 ... I have no idea what's being said privately & actually can't guess what JC will do. I there'll be huge pressure not to stand from Momentum. For what it's worth, I hope he stands as independent. It's the right thing for the people of Islington North who need a good MP.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Ok. It's time to grasp the Trotsky nettle. There is significant suggesting that Trotsky collaborated with the Fascist Powers in the hope of being appointed leader of the Soviet Union in the event of a Fascist invasion. It is historical FACT that Soviet leaders believed this.
2/ For those who want to check these claims themselves, evidence can be found here: google.com/url?sa=t&sourc…
Trotskyist groups are perhaps not best placed to cast aspersions on the associations of others. Nobody is as pure as the driven snow, and certainly not their idol.
3/ That Soviet leaders genuinely believed Trotsky was collaborating with fascist powers to overthrow the government is of huge significance to our understanding of the Moscow "show" trials. Why?
1/ How did we get here? A thread on Allan Dulles (the Director the CIA), his ties to British Nazi sympathisers, real Nazis and the actual historically documented conspiracy (no theory needed) for world domination by an Anglo Saxon master race. (May take a while)...
2/ Allen Dulles, like William Donavon before him, had close links to the British establishment, particularly in Dulles's case, those with Nazi sympathies such as Lady Astor, who went on to become the first female MP. This is from David Talbot's the Devil's Chessboard.
@BarnabyRaine@Pragmatic_Keith@OwenJones84 1/ Thanks for replying. I'm disagreeing with the premise of your argument & the concept of paranoia on both sides. Not v. clear from my tweet (my error). But your argument is that the situation you reconstructed & I quoted was caused by paranoia created by mutual misunderstanding
@BarnabyRaine@Pragmatic_Keith@OwenJones84 2/ Your argument hinges on the untestable, unverifiable notion that antisemitism (or "anti-semitism") exists as a "structure of feeling". That someone could, in your analysis, say "Zionist" & mean "Jew" opens the door to a total descent into unjustified paranoia. Nevertheless...
@BarnabyRaine@Pragmatic_Keith@OwenJones84 3/ Your argument that there is "good reason for thinking that anti-Semitic attitudes are likely to be dramatically more widespread than is usually thought" suggests that "paranoia" over anti-Semitism is not, in fact irrational. In other words...
2/ 1. BvS (Extended) and ZSJL (both 5 stars, I can't decide which I like more) 2. Man of Steel (4 stars - it has problems with a slightly clunky script, but come on!) 3. Wonder Woman (4 Stars - almost as good as Man of Steel but doesn't have Snyder's flare)
...
5. Black Adam (3.5 Stars - a really solid, enjoyable and much underrated superhero film) 6. Aquaman (3 stars - profoundly OK, a bit too silly for my tastes but takes some of the good from MoS & also boasts wonderful underwater visuals) 7. Suicide Squad (2 Stars: it was butchered)
1/ If true, it is a sign that @wbd has learnt nothing from Josstice League about audiences & expectation management. Is the Matt Reeves grim & gritty Batman audience the same as the jokey James Gunn audience? Almost certainly not. #SellZSJLtoNetflix#SellSnyderVerseToNetflix
2/ Just as Snyder's fans were alienated/infuriated by Joss Whedon's Justice League, so will be true of Reeve's Batman audience when encountering Gunn's cartoonish expectation subverting Superman. Or there is another explanation... #SellZSJLtoNetflix#SellSnyderVerseToNetflix
3/ ... That the Gunnverse isn't planned to properly materialise before the likely 2024 takeover, which means the only DCU projects to be announced will be Batman related. This would be a face saving measure for Gunn & @wbd, and a way to put off producing film franchises that...
1/ Thread to explain where my thoughts on this come from. The work of the Zionist movement founder, Theodor Herzl. Herzl conceived of a Jewish state as requiring the support of the European Powers: "Immigration is futile unless we have the sovereign right"...
2/ Herzl's logic was paternalistic, premised upon the idea of European style economic development. In his recognition of the need for backing by colonial powers is admission that the existing population might not appreciate the advantages brought by the colonists.
3/ Immigration alone wouldn't work, so imperial backing would be needed if & when the matter needed to be forced. Hence the importance of the Balfour declaration addressed to Lord Rothschild, a leading figure in the British Zionist movement in 1917.